[HPLC/MS] AP Test E + NPP

The OP is on Watson and he indicated his values are closer to x6-7. I am a member of Nelson Virgil's Trt group on Facebook and I see bloods every day posted that conflict with the generic x10 rule.

I am convinced that even if I summons every one of them to post bloods to this thread it wouldn't matter. You would find some dumb logic to cling to your dogma.

I think guys like these "rules" because it gives them a reason to strut around meso like some know it all bully.

I am glad this thread happened, because it really exposed the "doctors" intelligence.
 
The OP is on Watson and he indicated his values are closer to x6-7. I am a member of Nelson Virgil's Trt group on Facebook and I see bloods every day posted that conflict with the generic x10 rule.

I am convinced that even if I summons every one of them to post bloods to this thread it wouldn't matter. You would find some dumb logic to cling to your dogma.

I think guys like these "rules" because it gives them a reason to strut around meso like some know it all bully.

I am glad this thread happened, because it really exposed the "doctors" intelligence.

Do you mean Nelson Vergel? would love if you cost post data,barring you cross out any sensitive information. the more data the better

im not questing the doc's intelligence, i just question the unwillingness to engage what is a meaningful debate. we all know 3*3=9 and that the sky is blue, but if someone comes up to you and ask "can you explain why?" you dont just say "because it just is". if it's there's a way to explain it you explain it- however an unwillingness to explain is an indicator that there is no evidence or that one is ignorant of the explanation.
 
Sure you would think that but then again you would never even make an attempt to account for the differences, would you, Mr TRT using an AI, HCG and drawing bloods later than 48 Hours, lol!
 
One and two, yep count them bc now Meso has TWO VILLAGE IDIOTS, lol!

You two clowns can enjoy YOUR THREAD!
 
Sure you would think that but then again you would never even make an attempt to account for the differences, would you, Mr TRT using an AI, HCG and drawing bloods later than 48 Hours, lol!
Again, look through this section at blood draws. Everyone is running an AI. I bet you are quick to utilize their values to scrutinize. Or do you level set and say " well you were on an AI?"

You are looking for a variable to skew my results to your bias which you wouldn't do in the reverse situation

What a joke.
 
Yeah, I don't know man. It comes from APS pharmacy. And my friend uses the same exact doctor, same pharmacy and his numbers come out higher. I am not questioning it's dosing. I have run UGL on top of that and my bloods were consistent (i.e. 700 mg/wk- 500 UGL and 200 pharma) put me at 3300. I have tested one other UGL and it was a little less where I concluded that UGL was likely under dosed.

Either way, you are missing the point completely. I know people teset at dose x10. I also know that people test at dose x7 or dose x5. There is NO rule. It is all over the place. that is why when you first start TRT doctors will test you often to get you dialed in.
Curious, what are your stats? Body fat, weight ect?
 
Bloody hell I wanted to pull the trigger on AP but all this garbage happening has made me change my mind... guess I'm gonna wait for more blood work.
 
Yeah so I was going to stay out of this one entirely and believe me I'm not coming to the "noob's" (Dr Jim's words) but regardless of the respect that a lot of WKM's have for the Dr, there is clearly some obfuscation going on here. Some very good arguments were made here as to why the 10X rule may not be any more accurate than a supposed 5X rule and there has been NO EVIDENCE POSTED to the contrary other than a quote from Scally and a reference by Dr Jim to clinical studies which are proving to be as illusive as a pink unicorn. Instead, the usual ensues... A few supposed well respected members jump to the Dr's defense while simultaneously questioning the credibility of the poster. MESO is getting way to predictable now. I'm really disappointed about the devolution of this forum and the way members can't engage in legitimate dialog without being bashed. I'm fairly confident that this isn't what Millard had in mind when he created this forum. Very good points have been made here by guys on TRT and while these points may be inaccurate, Dr Jim has done nothing to prove that to be the case and has resorted to petty name calling. Sad.
 
Yeah so I was going to stay out of this one entirely and believe me I'm not coming to the "noob's" (Dr Jim's words) but regardless of the respect that a lot of WKM's have for the Dr, there is clearly some obfuscation going on here. Some very good arguments were made here as to why the 10X rule may not be any more accurate than a supposed 5X rule and there has been NO EVIDENCE POSTED to the contrary other than a quote from Scally and a reference by Dr Jim to clinical studies which are proving to be as illusive as a pink unicorn. Instead, the usual ensues... A few supposed well respected members jump to the Dr's defense while simultaneously questioning the credibility of the poster. MESO is getting way to predictable now. I'm really disappointed about the devolution of this forum and the way members can't engage in legitimate dialog without being bashed. I'm fairly confident that this isn't what Millard had in mind when he created this forum. Very good points have been made here by guys on TRT and while these points may be inaccurate, Dr Jim has done nothing to prove that to be the case and has resorted to petty name calling. Sad.

The only "sad part" is people like you can't do their own damn homework to prove their own points like myself and Dr Scally have done on many occasions. Yea we are supposed to respond to any clowns beckoning call for proof, get a life MOOSE!

If you honestly believe there is no evidence to support the "ten times rule" (and then some) rest assured you are the one who will be running for the nearest exit WHEN I CHOOSE TO post exactly that. Or they will concoct more BS to bolster their arguments such as "bloods" that don't exist, hearsay testimonials, third party observations, or their "gut" instinct, lol!

But what's really sad is some of you fools have now dug yourself into a proverbial pit of stupidity, completely ignoring the FACT a PEAK TT LEVEL will exceed the STEADY STATE NADIR by at least THREE to FOUR FOLD, thereby EASILY achieving the 10 fold increase I'm referring to.

(Moreover, I feel it's my obligation to allow these two the opportunity to "explain their position" regardless of how baseless it may seem, bc after all this is Meso, where completely transparent dialogue is the NORM, LOL!)

And the peak to steady state info is also available on GOOGLE Moose, yea so for a select few, ignorance is a way of life and all of my efforts to the contrary are in vain!

Finally why aren't you and these recent "do drop ins" locate evidence that supports their assertion a post-injection TT peak value of 5-6 is the norm! Because thats evidence does NOT EXIST, period!
 
Last edited:
Bloody hell I wanted to pull the trigger on AP but all this garbage happening has made me change my mind... guess I'm gonna wait for more blood work.

That mate would be a VERY WISE decision, well at least until the HPLC's being conducted on Alpha's AAS are completed in a couple weeks fella.
 
Some very good arguments were made here as to why the 10X rule may not be any more accurate than a supposed 5X rule

No there weren't.

A few supposed well respected members jump to the Dr's defense while simultaneously questioning the credibility of the poster.

With good reason.

I'm really disappointed about the devolution of this forum and the way members can't engage in legitimate dialog without being bashed.

Do you need help finding the exit?

ery good points have been made here by guys on TRT and while these points may be inaccurate, Dr Jim has done nothing to prove that to be the case and has resorted to petty name calling.

Those raising the "very good points" are the ones responsible for proving them. It's not the critics job to disprove them.


Indeed.
 
Yep. Just as I thought. More name calling. Little evidence. And to clarify I never stated that the 5X rule or whatever the hell you want to call it was valid but you still haven't proven its not. Hell I'll be thrilled if you do post up some evidence because I actually want to know how his gold standard was derived at. But right now it's difficult to see past your tireless name calling.
 
@Moose great observations, im relieved there is at least one WKM who sees beyond the ridiculousness.

i have repeated referred to the Bhasin et all 2012 study I linked, @Dr JIM would you please take a look as that study has been referenced by Scally himself. i am looking for an explanation as to why the TT levels were higher on Bhasin et al 2012 vs 2001 study. there is no mention of when the bloods were drawn but the TT levels on the 2012 studies also do not show 10x.

im not here to engage in what moose has described as "petty name calling". im here to talk science, if you want to talk science let's talk. otherwise, there's nothing for us to talk about.
 
@Moose @Dr JIM

sorry for the double post but just wanted you moose to be aware of several more observations:

-Dr. jim has repeatedly mentioned a clinical study. eventually that clinical study has devolved into Scally's observations=clinical study. that is absolutely not what a clinical study is. at a minimum a clinical study involves controls and peer reviews.

-no one has addressed my quartile post

-no one has explained why many TRT patients receive lower 10x TT blood levels other than "it's the patient's fault". im i doubting that these countless reports of blood levels less than 10x i've seen here as well as other boards are all flawed.

there are too many flaws in this argument and no one is willing to engage in me with discussion. i am not here ranting or raving, i have provided valid points and arguments, so anyone want to debate me?

moose- if there's any weaknesses or points of clarification in anything i've posted let me know. im happy to elaborate on any points ive made. i have nothing to fear as i have a solid argument with more than just accusations to back it up
 
Anyone reading this thread should do a little google image search for TRT blood work,
you can browse 100's of posted blood tests and come to your own conclusion on the 10x rule.
 
Anyone reading this thread should do a little google image search for TRT blood work,
you can browse 100's of posted blood tests and come to your own conclusion on the 10x rule.

yup 100% agree with this, my question is how and where did this 10x rule come from? i know scally said it but why are we shutting down all debate about it? an analogy i can draw is 99% of scientist believe in theory of evolution, but does that mean we stop all research and discussion into it? no, there's still plenty of research being done on evolution. i would say the same should apply here.
 
Anyone reading this thread should do a little google image search for TRT blood work,
you can browse 100's of posted blood tests and come to your own conclusion on the 10x rule.
Exactly. I am a memeber of TRT forums and I have been for years. People constantly post bloods that are all over the place. This is with Waston, Compounding etc.. not UGL's.
 
Back
Top