Ps. @El new guy wait for it......... lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your labs are from April, why did you wait this long for this open letter shit?
I'll have to take your word for it. I just don't have what it takes at this point in my day to read the post that's one enormous block of text.lol, great read, lol.
Sup, @Wunderpus? I think I share your thoughts, somewhat, in regards to this member.^ Your best post yet, I like the direction you're heading in.
You come here with anecdotal "results", then show how easy it would be to LIE, if you were going to, to "destroy" a lab.
Not interested in defending or destroying Pcom, personally, but explain to me why they've mostly tested in range on all mass specs, but some nobody is having bad results?
the solution is simple. you are sure the gear is underdosed. send this product to Simec. if it is really underdosed Pharmacom will completely cover all testing expenses and replace you all items ordered. If it is not, you pay for testing. this will be our standard solution now. You are so sure you are right, prove it.This is a open letter I posted:
Darius Postovski,
Subject: Validity of products.
Stats and history: Age: 50 5'10 205lbs. 12% B.F. Diet: 4000-4300 cal Clean Years of training: 25+ Anabolic Cycles: 15+ Tren E, Sust, Deca, Var, Premo, Test C, Test E, Dbol, Anadrol 50
Purchased: (3) Test Ethenate 300, (3)Tren Ethenate 200 and PCT
Weekly mg. : Test Ethenate 900mg Tren Ethenate 600mg Approaching 10 weeks.
Results: 3 lb. increase in weight. Slight drop in B.F. Minor increase in strength. This may be contributed to placebo effect or increase in training and diet.
Side Effects: No bloat, No night sweats, No acne, No testicular shrinkage or shutdown, No Hair loss, No increase in aggression, No increase in vascularity. Bad: Acid Reflux
Conclusion: Under dosed product. This is my opinion based on my body and my experiences with anabolics. I have many years experience and do not have to have blood work done or have products tested for compounds. Please use this information and draw your own conclusions based on my results.
Darius, I'm giving you this review because of my disappointment in Pharmacom. I'm not pinning this on you because all products were shipped from the "factory" not you. Your responses to my question were met with short delay and were always handled professionally. Shipment was also handled top notch. Unfortunately I have many years experience with anabolics and from the results I have gotten I have no choice but to feel the product was under dosed. I have seen your test results on certain products. I also have heard that many UG labs have had trouble with raws being substandard. I just want to make you aware of my feedback at this time. I hope to hear better things in the future from Pharmacom.
I just droned on and on about how the member you are referring to will NOT go through the motions you suggest. He made it pretty clear he wouldn't be sending vials around the globe or poking and prodding his body in an attempt to analyze blood.the solution is simple. you are sure the gear is underdosed. send this product to Simec. if it is really underdosed Pharmacom will completely cover all testing expenses and replace you all items ordered. If it is not, you pay for testing. this will be our standard solution now. You are so sure you are right, prove it.
Funny you should mention send it too simec. Seems when someone does just that (Pharmacom gear).The test is just delayed and delayed and for what reasons ? Makes the little wheels in my brain start turning.the solution is simple. you are sure the gear is underdosed. send this product to Simec. if it is really underdosed Pharmacom will completely cover all testing expenses and replace you all items ordered. If it is not, you pay for testing. this will be our standard solution now. You are so sure you are right, prove it.
Simec told us they have delays until August. In August they are moving to another facility or buying some new columns, something like this, so they promised tests will be carried out faster.I just droned on and on about how the member you are referring to will NOT go through the motions you suggest. He made it pretty clear he wouldn't be sending vials around the globe or poking and prodding his body in an attempt to analyze blood.
@Pharmacom Labs, I realize you're busy but if you took the time to read the posts members are taking the time to construct and put up. I wouldn't expect you to read every thread on our board but I would expect you to take the time to read threads that are created by YOUR customers and are concerned specifically with your products. Your apparent lack of motivation to take a different approach....or a good idea may be to take additional steps along with your generic and "go to" response of sending out your gear and then sitting back and enjoying the quiet as members are expected to wait patiently for results that don't appear to be coming back any time soon.
It's clear, to me at least, that @Diego1580 isn't going to bite and get caught up in the obvious problems simec is having. There appears to be delays that will be turning into several months before results are returned.
I suggest you and the entire team of pharmacom employees from both camps take some time to come up with some ideas on how to get out in front of what has clearly become a steady influx of the usual concerns along with what SHOULD be a serious concern to all of those affiliated with pharmacom. I'm talking about complaints and concerns surrounding issues that haven't been seen by members here up until now.
It is becoming more clear.as time goes by and more pharmacom customers come forward that there are possible safety/step lconcerns that could hserious
in some cases simec needs to order reference samples which can delay the final report up to 3 month. Thosу samples are ordered from verified repositories and include all respective certificates, etc. For example, we are currently waiting for results of our cabergoline raws (and many others), this is the reason.Funny you should mention send it too simec. Seems when someone does just that (Pharmacom gear).The test is just delayed and delayed and for what reasons ? Makes the little wheels in my brain start turning.
This is a open letter I posted:
Darius Postovski,
Subject: Validity of products.
Stats and history: Age: 50 5'10 205lbs. 12% B.F. Diet: 4000-4300 cal Clean Years of training: 25+ Anabolic Cycles: 15+ Tren E, Sust, Deca, Var, Premo, Test C, Test E, Dbol, Anadrol 50
Purchased: (3) Test Ethenate 300, (3)Tren Ethenate 200 and PCT
Weekly mg. : Test Ethenate 900mg Tren Ethenate 600mg Approaching 10 weeks.
Results: 3 lb. increase in weight. Slight drop in B.F. Minor increase in strength. This may be contributed to placebo effect or increase in training and diet.
Side Effects: No bloat, No night sweats, No acne, No testicular shrinkage or shutdown, No Hair loss, No increase in aggression, No increase in vascularity. Bad: Acid Reflux
Conclusion: Under dosed product. This is my opinion based on my body and my experiences with anabolics. I have many years experience and do not have to have blood work done or have products tested for compounds. Please use this information and draw your own conclusions based on my results.
Darius, I'm giving you this review because of my disappointment in Pharmacom. I'm not pinning this on you because all products were shipped from the "factory" not you. Your responses to my question were met with short delay and were always handled professionally. Shipment was also handled top notch. Unfortunately I have many years experience with anabolics and from the results I have gotten I have no choice but to feel the product was under dosed. I have seen your test results on certain products. I also have heard that many UG labs have had trouble with raws being substandard. I just want to make you aware of my feedback at this time. I hope to hear better things in the future from Pharmacom.
I'm going to say a Pharmacom customer that isn't happy with the response he received from them. So OP is going public with his issues. No?So what is this thread about even?
I'm going to say a Pharmacom customer that isn't happy with the response he received from them. So OP is going public with his issues. No?
He inject, he lift, no gainz, unhappyI guess. Sounds like a jealous hit piece. Can I get the cliffnotes for the novel?
Fuck bro your new favorite saying hey ? Lolhit piece
please post the exact numbered list of issues which need to be solved. i do not see any growing amount of problems. there are no problems at all, there are some situations and solutions. give an exact list and we will reply one by one.I haven't been an active participant in Pharmacom threads as things were being handled adequately. I'd like to ask @Darius PharmacomStore, the Frank associated with pharmacom, @Pharmacom Helper, @Pharmacokinetics Labs, and any other reps I may have overlooked, to take the time to get together to discuss amongst yourselves the current state of affairs and the growing number of problems.
I'd then like you all to come to us as a board and let us know the new plan to correct or address these issues.
I'm going to give you my thoughts as things stand right now. I'm very concerned with the number of problems being reported and what appears to be issues throughout the organization in every area. From a possible issue in bottling...to shipping..to possible potency.
Do you personally have concerns? Have you contacted me at least once regarding this? If you had you would have receive an absolutely definite method description how to identify those vials. If you say this, you even did not try to ask me. Otherwise you would not have any concerns.Then there are concerns about properly identifying vials shipped "stealth". There doesn't seem to be a firm and consistent method to be sure what is what in orders received.
any customer having such issues would first of all contact us and report the situation. such questions are not discussed/solved in public. i mean not that he did not have to post it here. this is his full right of course. i mean that he did not even address us personally regarding his situation. he did not ask us about anything. biggerben69, stop speaking like a small child. The safety of members depends by 90% on members only. For those who has any doubts and concerns we offered an civilized method called chromatography. This info was advertised everywhere, on site, on boards, per emails. Those who indeed have doubts contact us and take advantage of the offer. No other source offered it before us. So what you say about customers safety? We, those who pay for individual testing of customer`s products don`t care about customers? Really? Show me the better service.I'm starting to get an uneasy feeling that member safety and product consistency/quality as well as overall and specific areas in customer service have taken a position of secondary concern behind what feels like an all out push to increase sales at all costs.
When I see members reporting being hospitalized with what sounds like infections specific to what is being introduced from a specific vial or vials things need to slow down and a plan dealing with how to move forward needs to be discussed and agreed upon.
What are you speaking about? Which exactly case you mean? Do you know that most of the customers saying we sent wrong items or we indicated wrong address - in 95% those customers are guilty in what happened. We never change addresses. If a package was returned back it means only one thing - the customer filled the address info wrong. For some reason lot of customers write the first name in the field - full name and the second name in the field - address. So the address is missing in fact, postal men can not find it and ships it back. Is it our fault? Obviously not. If someone can not even correctly fill the fields why shall we be liable for this? However, in lot of cases i still agree to reship even such orders. We never do mistakes in the addresses, because we always print them out as is.When I see these red flags and issue after issue being brought to the pharmacom team who in turn handles an order that had been shipped but then returned while promising a reship because of an error on their part and then pharmacom cant locate the pack or info related to it. Each rep gave the member a promise to ship but each had a different thought on who was to blame for it not being located. Then our member in what looked at an attempt to silence the member by producing SOMETHING/ANYTHING throwing the first thing they could find which was the original tracking # for the pack that was returned. No effort was made to confirm what was offered as a solution was a solution. It imstead served as another example of members being treated to sub par service.
which thread? this thread you mean?The last straw......or the thing I witnessed that moved me to act was when aan obviously intelligent and unhappy and dissatisfied customer starts a thread that was well written and articulated and expressed his concerns with pharmacom ptoduct he purchased and used.
The rep for pharmacon quickly and without consideration was able to solve the problem/situation with what has come to resemble a way to pass the buck and silence unhappy customers without any attempt to help out or give some measure of customer service.
The rep upon being made aware of an issue but without exploring the issue to possibly help our member makes a post that read like the rep was going to play his trump card and with an arrogant tone along with a tone that felt like there was to be no other option.
What pissed me off beyond the down playing all these examples of issues that all happened within the last 8 hours and while not concerned with this sudden rush of problems and the only part of the pharmacom biz wanting to deal with is putting as much of the potentially problem gear out on the street as fast as possible and collect paymet.
This rep knew simec was eitther backed up and results were being delayed a number of months or samples were no longer being accepted. The rep was aware of this but made no attempt to explain this to the member. The reps answer to this problem was to not consider the members plight. He had no other choice. Here was an unsatisfied member who was being told his opinions and experience meant nothing. This rep had taken payment from this member and when the customer felt he had been sold bunk gear was prepared to not inform the member of the several months that would go by before results would be known.
The customer was left with nothing to show for his purchase. Only a "we'll call when we get results".
The group of people that rep pharmacom here have ZERO overhead and have overtime eliminated any kind of responsibility they may have had or felt they had.
Pharmacom and the sales crew are wanting to ignore the rush of issues piling up. The one thing that they have a concern about and see through to completion is the sale and the exchange of money that ends up in the pockets of the reps.
If there isn't a big change in how meso members are handled I will personally do.all I can to stop the flow of money into pharnacoms pockets by running off buyers of their profuct. Where do we go from herre?
This is a open letter I posted:
Darius Postovski,
Subject: Validity of products.
Stats and history: Age: 50 5'10 205lbs. 12% B.F. Diet: 4000-4300 cal Clean Years of training: 25+ Anabolic Cycles: 15+ Tren E, Sust, Deca, Var, Premo, Test C, Test E, Dbol, Anadrol 50
Purchased: (3) Test Ethenate 300, (3)Tren Ethenate 200 and PCT
Weekly mg. : Test Ethenate 900mg Tren Ethenate 600mg Approaching 10 weeks.
Results: 3 lb. increase in weight. Slight drop in B.F. Minor increase in strength. This may be contributed to placebo effect or increase in training and diet.
Side Effects: No bloat, No night sweats, No acne, No testicular shrinkage or shutdown, No Hair loss, No increase in aggression, No increase in vascularity. Bad: Acid Reflux
Conclusion: Under dosed product. This is my opinion based on my body and my experiences with anabolics. I have many years experience and do not have to have blood work done or have products tested for compounds. Please use this information and draw your own conclusions based on my results.
Darius, I'm giving you this review because of my disappointment in Pharmacom. I'm not pinning this on you because all products were shipped from the "factory" not you. Your responses to my question were met with short delay and were always handled professionally. Shipment was also handled top notch. Unfortunately I have many years experience with anabolics and from the results I have gotten I have no choice but to feel the product was under dosed. I have seen your test results on certain products. I also have heard that many UG labs have had trouble with raws being substandard. I just want to make you aware of my feedback at this time. I hope to hear better things in the future from Pharmacom.
So, what do i think.Purchased: (3) Test Ethenate 300, (3)Tren Ethenate 200 and PCT
Weekly mg. : Test Ethenate 900mg Tren Ethenate 600mg Approaching 10 weeks.
Results: 3 lb. increase in weight. Slight drop in B.F. Minor increase in strength. This may be contributed to placebo effect or increase in training and diet.
Side Effects: No bloat, No night sweats, No acne, No testicular shrinkage or shutdown, No Hair loss, No increase in aggression, No increase in vascularity. Bad: Acid Reflux
Conclusion: Under dosed product. This is my opinion based on my body and my experiences with anabolics. I have many years experience and do not have to have blood work done or have products tested for compounds. Please use this information and draw your own conclusions based on my results.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator
