Pharmasource EU pharmaceuticals

I believe pharmasource is trying to slim down on packing not add more to it,, it will pass the post more descretely. His packaging now is good already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRT
If it's so fucking good then how come mine was handed to me with shit leaking out in the mail man's hand. Get off his dick!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Bro...... blame the postal peeps. They're all amateur Tom Brady's. I sent a good friend of mine a personalized watch I had made for him because he retired down to Florida and couldn't make it to union meetings anymore and they made him a watch which I vouched for to send it to him and the stupid cunt in the mail office flung the pack like a frisbee into the bin....god knows what they do in the big mail rooms/ transport rooms and trucks.
 
If it's so fucking good then how come mine was handed to me with shit leaking out in the mail man's hand. Get off his dick!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Sorry to hear that, I know the packaging is thin but PS insists this is to pass better, just quoting his words.

If it goes through with. 1.or 2 things broken it's better than losing whole pack I suppose.
 
LAST 3ml vials PRIMUS RAY AVAILABLE, LAST OF LAST

TRENBOLONE ENANTHATE 12 vials - 36ml
DROSTANOLONE PROPIONATE 15 vials - 45ml
- price of this pack = 130,- USD , shipping FREE


LAST OF LAST LETROZOL CIPLA - after warranty period ( 10/2016 )
23 last boxes available
4 boxes now = 50 ,- USD
 
Sorry to hear that, I know the packaging is thin but PS insists this is to pass better, just quoting his words.

If it goes through with. 1.or 2 things broken it's better than losing whole pack I suppose.
So if 2 or three amps break during shipping he is willing to spend almost triple to ship it than the product is worth? I'd say add a few dollars to shipping to add vaccuum sealing and he would save a hell of alot of money. I myself had a few break with last pack but due to my current situation I have decided to not fuck with it untill my two other packs come in
 
Sorry to hear that, I know the packaging is thin but PS insists this is to pass better, just quoting his words.

If it goes through with. 1.or 2 things broken it's better than losing whole pack I suppose.
My bad about going off. They was more to it than what you knew. But I want to thank @ Pharmasource for resolving the situation.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
Bro...... blame the postal peeps. They're all amateur Tom Brady's. I sent a good friend of mine a personalized watch I had made for him because he retired down to Florida and couldn't make it to union meetings anymore and they made him a watch which I vouched for to send it to him and the stupid cunt in the mail office flung the pack like a frisbee into the bin....god knows what they do in the big mail rooms/ transport rooms and trucks.

Which, again, as I have already stated, is ALL THE MORE REASON why the packs need to be packaged more securely to begin with!

You and Pharmasource are both correct in your posts when you point out that these packs are handled by a lot of different people, and not handled gently by those people. Which is why the packs need to be packaged in a way to reduce the chance that the monkeys flinging them around will damage them.

This source has spoken and spoken quickly on this. He has made it clear that if we want securely packaged vials in our shipments, we have to order elsewhere, and he has every right to make that decision. Good enough for me.

Just FYI though, even the most amateur of UGL's in the year 2017 use certain packing materials to ship their vials which is incredibly more secure than placing vials in a zip lock baggie (I will keep the details out of this for security reasons but I am sure most guys here know what I am talking about).

Despite the fact that I strongly disagree with your decision on this Pharmasource, I do appreciate you addressing the issue quickly. I have seen quite a few of your packs and as a member who respects and likes you, I will just honestly tell you that the manner in which you pack your vials is unsafe and lacking in comparison to what many of us would consider the acceptable norm in 2017.

Again, just looking out for all involved...
 
Which, again, as I have already stated, is ALL THE MORE REASON why the packs need to be packaged more securely to begin with!

You and Pharmasource are both correct in your posts when you point out that these packs are handled by a lot of different people, and not handled gently by those people. Which is why the packs need to be packaged in a way to reduce the chance that the monkeys flinging them around will damage them.

This source has spoken and spoken quickly on this. He has made it clear that if we want securely packaged vials in our shipments, we have to order elsewhere, and he has every right to make that decision. Good enough for me.

Just FYI though, even the most amateur of UGL's in the year 2017 use certain packing materials to ship their vials which is incredibly more secure than placing vials in a zip lock baggie (I will keep the details out of this for security reasons but I am sure most guys here know what I am talking about).

Despite the fact that I strongly disagree with your decision on this Pharmasource, I do appreciate you addressing the issue quickly. I have seen quite a few of your packs and as a member who respects and likes you, I will just honestly tell you that the manner in which you pack your vials is unsafe and lacking in comparison to what many of us would consider the acceptable norm in 2017.

Again, just looking out for all involved...

Well as he stated and I'm sure it's his final word on the matter. I'm very neutral with this and to be honest and clear. I do feel for anyone who gets a pack that's damaged or compromised. So far I've been incredibly lucky but then again it's always Location Location Location.

Some sources won't even mail anything unless you're on the "right" coast
 
Well as he stated and I'm sure it's his final word on the matter. I'm very neutral with this and to be honest and clear. I do feel for anyone who gets a pack that's damaged or compromised. So far I've been incredibly lucky but then again it's always Location Location Location.

Some sources won't even mail anything unless you're on the "right" coast

You're a young buck in this game 2D2P, but you're experienced. You have ordered from enough sources to know what is secure packaging, and what could be more secure, brother.

There is a reason that both @mands and myself posted what we posted regarding package integrity here. Combined, we have a WHOLE LOT of experience in this game. You could say we have seen it all. And you read what each of us have posted. Think about that.
 
Guys please, stop another witch hunt. 90% may be more our customers they never posted here, to this time was send thousands ampoules and several hundreds of vials. Broken was less like 0,01% .
 
Guys please, stop another witch hunt. 90% may be more our customers they never posted here, to this time was send thousands ampoules and several hundreds of vials. Broken was less like 0,01% .
Just out of curiosity the shippin price was brought up when the upgraded packaging was mentioned. I'm sure myself and many others wouldn't even mind paying 10$ for shipping to prevent broken amps or vials. Not to mention it's not the broken merchandise that's the issue it's the mailman or customs seeing leaking oil/substance in the package.
 
Just out of curiosity the shippin price was brought up when the upgraded packaging was mentioned. I'm sure myself and many others wouldn't even mind paying 10$ for shipping to prevent broken amps or vials. Not to mention it's not the broken merchandise that's the issue it's the mailman or customs seeing leaking oil/substance in the package.
It's not a witch hunt. I agree with op make it an option for those who take security serious I would pay extra for the peace of mind. Those who aren't worried well let them carry on with the normal.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
Guys please, stop another witch hunt. 90% may be more our customers they never posted here, to this time was send thousands ampoules and several hundreds of vials. Broken was less like 0,01% .
This is not a witch hunt. Have your reshippers get there shipping methods and packs more secure is all we are saying.

It's the customer that will take the heat for a reshipper not properly taking care of a package when it's noticed with leaking products or products exposed.

I know how reshippers get paid and they get paid by packages shipped mostly. So, I'm sure they are hustling to get packs out and being careless on some.

You should of came in here and stated, hey I will check into it and make sure my shippers get their act together and you will get with who had the issues and reship the damaged goods.

That's all nothing less or more. So take care of it.

mands
 
Just out of curiosity the shippin price was brought up when the upgraded packaging was mentioned. I'm sure myself and many others wouldn't even mind paying 10$ for shipping to prevent broken amps or vials. Not to mention it's not the broken merchandise that's the issue it's the mailman or customs seeing leaking oil/substance in the package.
Shouldn't be an added cost. The sources need to get a handle on good shipping methods and their shippers.

mands
 
Sorry to hear that, I know the packaging is thin but PS insists this is to pass better, just quoting his words.

If it goes through with. 1.or 2 things broken it's better than losing whole pack I suppose.
Vacuum sealing adds minimal to thickness.

mands
 
@bickel29 I'll be honest vacuum sealing does give the consumer a peace of mind. And ampoules of all things should be handled with more care.
You're a young buck in this game 2D2P, but you're experienced. You have ordered from enough sources to know what is secure packaging, and what could be more secure, brother.

There is a reason that both @mands and myself posted what we posted regarding package integrity here. Combined, we have a WHOLE LOT of experience in this game. You could say we have seen it all. And you read what each of us have posted. Think about that.

Between you and @mands I got a life time of learning. Yes of all things , peace of mind when a pack is in transit is what we need especially when guys have families etc etc. I have had guys PM asking me about certain sources and how they handle packing/signing for packs etc because they worry about there families.

So yeah we all have a concern about this and to honest. To be honest I wasn't expecting Pharmasource to be this cut and dry on our suggestions for a safer package. Yes, his packing is crude and archaic especially the journey the pack takes from its origin. But he has made it clear that this will be his only method.

I have expressed outloud in this thread that Pharmasource has the potential to be another 24K but perhaps a source has to make mistakes in order to improve. But at what cost will the mistake be..... putting Meso-rx members at risk with there packs is something no source should risk.

___________________________________

This isn't directed towards Pharmasource but I don't know if you guys realize Meso-RX is a gateway to any amateur with a few bucks in his hand ready and willing to purchase gear through our post and comments...... therefore I firmly believe sources that Land here should treat us a lot better as a community and take heed of what Veterans like @bickel29 , @mands and @Big_paul suggest.
 
Back
Top