Injectable Dianabol

I agree. Pills would be way easier! No pain and can dose it twice a day if you needed or wanted to.

I'm assuming you got the 'free' injectable dbol with an order though
 
I didn't get any pip either but the actual pushing in of the oil killed for some reason. Maybe something was up with mine since it was 'free' lol
 
Why inject if you don't have to though. Save that for stuff that must be injected and save a lil scar tissue in the process. The only reason id say do it is if you're injecting ed anyways and would just add it to the barrel. Still not necessary though.
 
Just make things easy on yourself and take the pills Imo. Save yourself a painful injection and a pain in the ass. I doubt anyone notices a difference between oral and injectable. Just my thoughts.
There's an old article by either Dan Duchaine or Bill Roberts
that oral Dbol creates more IGF1 from it's first liver pass, thus reason why injectable feels the same or even weaker than orals.
Currently there's a debate if injectable makes it less liver damaging.
 
I got a buddy that got some of that free injectable dbol about a year back. He shot it in his fucking pec.

He only used it twice. Said the pain from injectable orals wasn't worth it.
 
I got a buddy that got some of that free injectable dbol about a year back. He shot it in his fucking pec.

He only used it twice. Said the pain from injectable orals wasn't worth it.

I'll see how it goes with me
 
There's an old article by either Dan Duchaine or Bill Roberts
that oral Dbol creates more IGF1 from it's first liver pass, thus reason why injectable feels the same or even weaker than orals.
Currently there's a debate if injectable makes it less liver damaging.

Dbol 5-alpha reduces into m1t, which would decrease 5a reduction rate by injecting compared to oral administration.
 
Dbol 5-alpha reduces into m1t, which would decrease 5a reduction rate by injecting compared to oral administration.
hmmmm
I think you're mistaken

17 aa steroids are mostly absorbed as-is

5a reductase will modify them to DHT-like-derivatives no matter if they are injected or oral.
Take for instance Testosterone, the amount that gets to the blood gets converted to dht no matter if taken orally (Andriol) or injected.
 
Why inject if you don't have to though. Save that for stuff that must be injected and save a lil scar tissue in the process. The only reason id say do it is if you're injecting ed anyways and would just add it to the barrel. Still not necessary though.
The biggest advantage, to me, is the longer bio-availability. My understanding from trials done on winstrol is, the winstrol depot was in the users' system for about 20 hours longer than the oral stuff... So, you could argue that it has a more profound effect... Also, users like myself who suffer from stomach pains/issues from orals do better on injectables. Lastly, they MAY cause less liver damage, still to be determined.

For most users, just pop the dbol. Injectable dbol is painful and tedious for negligible, if any, increase in results. But, just giving another perspective as to "why" someone may use it.
 
hmmmm
I think you're mistaken

17 aa steroids are mostly absorbed as-is

5a reductase will modify them to DHT-like-derivatives no matter if they are injected or oral.
Take for instance Testosterone, the amount that gets to the blood gets converted to dht no matter if taken orally (Andriol) or injected.

Yes some will still get converted but the most conversion takes place through the skin, then orally, then through injection.
 
So the half-life of the injectable is longer than the half-life of the oral? That makes sense, it seems to me like any depot of steroid oil you make inside yourself is going to be stuck there for a short time and be semi-protected from your body until it actually reaches your blood stream.
 
Back
Top