master.on
New Member
1 No armor
enemy gunfire was the main cause of death in Irak, not improvised explosives.
2 Awfully wide
doesn't fit in third world narrow streets, were most wars are fought
3 just seating for 4
some say it was on purpose so they can sell twice as many units
you can easily get 8 people in a Tahoe, so why in the world just 4 in a Humvee
Those humps between seats and transmission tunnels are totally unnecessary. All other 4x4s have smaller humps
4 cramped interior
narrow seats, low roof that bangs your helmet on bumps
5 "fastback" rearend
fastback on a vehicle that can't even reach 100 mph (even 80 mph is pushing it)
Why not a square end like all other SUVs? You could put all your guns and ammo on the deck, or even sit a couple soldiers (with a taller roof).
And so on, and so on
Most stupid vehicle ever.
Some say the replacement vehicle will be Chevy Tahoe based
some say truck based
almost like a 4wd armored cash transport with additional doors and windows, just not that tall.
enemy gunfire was the main cause of death in Irak, not improvised explosives.
2 Awfully wide
doesn't fit in third world narrow streets, were most wars are fought
3 just seating for 4
some say it was on purpose so they can sell twice as many units
you can easily get 8 people in a Tahoe, so why in the world just 4 in a Humvee
Those humps between seats and transmission tunnels are totally unnecessary. All other 4x4s have smaller humps
4 cramped interior
narrow seats, low roof that bangs your helmet on bumps
5 "fastback" rearend
fastback on a vehicle that can't even reach 100 mph (even 80 mph is pushing it)
Why not a square end like all other SUVs? You could put all your guns and ammo on the deck, or even sit a couple soldiers (with a taller roof).
And so on, and so on
Most stupid vehicle ever.
Some say the replacement vehicle will be Chevy Tahoe based
some say truck based
almost like a 4wd armored cash transport with additional doors and windows, just not that tall.

