cadafi
Member
I was just wondering if there is a legit source for the latest SARMs, i see guys like Tony Huge speaking wonders about them and using a lot of them i only know Ostarine.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Where do you guys get SARMs
- Thread starter cadafi
- Start date
iGone
Member
Proven Peptides
I've done their LGD and RAD.
Stay away from S4 and cardarine, known cancer risks.
Only really good for adding onto a test base in my opinion, if I can find my bloods LGD crashed my test to under 50 on week 6 at 7.5mg/day.
Also, contrary to popular belief SARMs do not stack, since they will be fighting for the same androgen receptors.
S4 and cardarine proved to be aggresive carcinogens while in trials with big pharma, as well as S4 causing a lot of vision issues.
But I frankly think none of the SARMs are worth it, hence why I'm just going to real gear now.
Just my $0.02
I've done their LGD and RAD.
Stay away from S4 and cardarine, known cancer risks.
Only really good for adding onto a test base in my opinion, if I can find my bloods LGD crashed my test to under 50 on week 6 at 7.5mg/day.
Also, contrary to popular belief SARMs do not stack, since they will be fighting for the same androgen receptors.
S4 and cardarine proved to be aggresive carcinogens while in trials with big pharma, as well as S4 causing a lot of vision issues.
But I frankly think none of the SARMs are worth it, hence why I'm just going to real gear now.
Just my $0.02
ounick28
Member
There is no 100% legit SARMs source.
As much as people hate to admit it, SARMs are one of the most faked compounds. Most of the time you will get either extremely under-dosed products or a fake with a filler that produces similar side-effects (ex. Clen & Ephedrine). A study done a few years back showed that 50% of sources don’t even have SARMs in their product and 40% contained an unapproved compound instead of a SARM.
Most of the sources that you will find on forums pay their way onto the forum through sponsorship and essentially have bought their “reputation” (ex. eSarms on Evolutionary forum). I have been watching the market for the past 5 years and there is no single staple source. Anytime there is a “good” source... they always end up flipping to selling junk (likely as an exit-strategy to turn a quick profit).
You can take your chance on some of the “good” sources as of late. However, make sure you verify that reviews for the sources are good on every AAS/SARMs forums... and that they aren’t just buying their reputation on that particular forum.
Just remember that almost every SARMs provider will eventually be a scam. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn’t understand the economics of a price-taking market without regulation dominated by price gouging scammers. If you are a legitimate manufacturer and have a large customer base... you are making slim margins because you actually fill your products with 100% SARMs but have to price your products competitively in this fraudulent market. You would be an idiot to not flip the switch and not make 98% gross profit margins on all orders until your customer base catches on. That’s why all “good” sources eventually go “bad”. Then the management team can literally open shop under another name and do the exact same thing since there is no regulation in this space.
That being said, I would suggest jumping on a cycle of AAS. No matter what your goal, you will get more noticeable results and won’t have to worry as much about taking bunk/fake gear. AAS are so cheap to make, there are actually healthy margins for legitimate providers to easily make a living instead of needing to scam.
This is my two cents on the space. Don’t take it as fact, but use it to craft your opinion.
As much as people hate to admit it, SARMs are one of the most faked compounds. Most of the time you will get either extremely under-dosed products or a fake with a filler that produces similar side-effects (ex. Clen & Ephedrine). A study done a few years back showed that 50% of sources don’t even have SARMs in their product and 40% contained an unapproved compound instead of a SARM.
Most of the sources that you will find on forums pay their way onto the forum through sponsorship and essentially have bought their “reputation” (ex. eSarms on Evolutionary forum). I have been watching the market for the past 5 years and there is no single staple source. Anytime there is a “good” source... they always end up flipping to selling junk (likely as an exit-strategy to turn a quick profit).
You can take your chance on some of the “good” sources as of late. However, make sure you verify that reviews for the sources are good on every AAS/SARMs forums... and that they aren’t just buying their reputation on that particular forum.
Just remember that almost every SARMs provider will eventually be a scam. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn’t understand the economics of a price-taking market without regulation dominated by price gouging scammers. If you are a legitimate manufacturer and have a large customer base... you are making slim margins because you actually fill your products with 100% SARMs but have to price your products competitively in this fraudulent market. You would be an idiot to not flip the switch and not make 98% gross profit margins on all orders until your customer base catches on. That’s why all “good” sources eventually go “bad”. Then the management team can literally open shop under another name and do the exact same thing since there is no regulation in this space.
That being said, I would suggest jumping on a cycle of AAS. No matter what your goal, you will get more noticeable results and won’t have to worry as much about taking bunk/fake gear. AAS are so cheap to make, there are actually healthy margins for legitimate providers to easily make a living instead of needing to scam.
This is my two cents on the space. Don’t take it as fact, but use it to craft your opinion.
Hit up Dylan gemelli over on evolutionary forum. I think he has some pct and on cycle support stuff too specially designed for sarms. 
cadafi
Member
Thanks guys for the info
ounick28
Member
Hit up Dylan gemelli over on evolutionary forum. I think he has some pct and on cycle support stuff too specially designed for sarms.
I think he even has special SARMs for your SARMs PCT... can’t skimp on the PCT man
KCMO
New Member
I’ve used science.bio a couple times. I got ostarine that I’m using at 15mg daily on a cut. All I have is a “feelz” report, but my strength has been improving slowly where usually after a couple weeks it nosedives, and I seem to be retaining more lean tissue than I typically do. I also picked up some mk677 but haven’t used it yet. For sarms, science.bio has a pretty solid reputation.
Dthcore
Member
Wait a second, what about mixing traditional anabolics with SARMS. Are they still utilizing the same receptors? I dont know is why i ask, i know SARMS are alot more selective though.
iGone
Member
To clarify,
mixing SARMs and anabolics is fine, mixing multiple SARMs together is useless since they all go for the same limited receptors.
However, I don't know how well they would really stack together. Seeing as SARMs are objectively less effective than anabolics, yet still retain the side effects and price.
Chmewy
Member
Just my opinion but if your gonna jump onto sarms, I would just go to aas. Here me out but I find SARMs to be hella sketchy cause unlike the UGLs here, there really isn’t any place for a vetting process. For all you know you could be taking something that is just water with some extra shit in it, or you could be taking pro hormones and not know it. At least with the aas here, you have somewhat of an idea of what your getting if you do your research
KCMO
New Member
that’s where I’m at with it too. AAS are cheaper, have a long history where we at least know what the long term health risks are, and payment is equally dicey. You can search for vendor reviews all you want on sarms but it’s ALL shills. How could so many of the reviews be polar opposites if not? Like I said, what I got from my place seems to be working. But I could be taking anything. Could be flour with extra strength placebo.
Lol
this killed me.
Side note, I do like to run a SARM while on an actual AAS cycle
Free gains
gainzoclock
New Member
I got my MK677 from science.bio (not a SARM, but they mainly sell SARMs and are well known)
@Silentlemon1011 - what SARMs would you recommend for bulking cycles?
@Silentlemon1011 - what SARMs would you recommend for bulking cycles?
4Figgy
Banned
Umbrella labs dot com. MK and RAD both had a positive feelz report. Water retention and hungry on the MK, and definitely had extra an extra push from the RAD while lifting. TIFWIW.
gainzoclock
New Member
What was your gear when on those cycles? I'm going on a test/deca/dbol/mk cycle. I didn't think RAD was worth adding but you guys are saying good things.
4Figgy
Banned
Just my normal 150mg/week trt dose. Really only got into SARMs b/c I wasn’t aware of the UGL game. I’m sitting on 4g of RAD which I won’t use unless things get crazy and all I can get is my script test cyp. Honestly I wouldn’t bother with SARMs when AAS is available.
gainzoclock
New Member
Will stick to the plan then, thanks
fuck SARMs whoever tells u its wonders tries to sell you shit, fuck this childish SARMS shit man only run the real sauce.
Honestly, none.
I think it's a great add on to a solid AAS cycle, but I just dont think they shine individually on any way shape or form, other than maybe helping with some gains.
I hear a lot about "Rad140 for cutting"
or "LGD for bulking" but they're both really mild in comparison to AAS to be honest.
