To be fair, none of this woulda even came up if buddy didn’t come in attacking me and being a total asshole for choosing to run something longer, and saying that you get better results from longer weeks on than fewer.
Honestly
I have to disagree.
You STATED that 20 weeks was a better cycle than 6 to 8
That's a statement that you decided to just post.
Oldschool and BBBG only responded to your post.
In your 20 week cycle..... you've crashed your lipids for an extended period of time. The longer you lipds are crashed, the more buildup you get and the worse the risks are... hence why the new norm is any week Oral finisher instead of a kick off
You're experiences fatigue from high androgens.
In those same 20 weeks...
2 blasts
Bith of them training INTENSE
Feel great at the end of the cycle.
Short term lipid crash etc.
I could go on for a while....
But I think you get the point.
ayou made a STATEMENT
If you had said.
"6 weeks sounds interesting...
But I PERSONALLY prefer a 20 week run (Insert reason, like PCT or you're running low doses)
Then no one would have said shit.
I do both.
I'll be running a 4-6 Tren blast soon.
Then in the winter a 16 week low dose Test/Deca/Mast.
It's the way you come off as being right and others are wrong.
without giving any REASONS behind it.
Learn