I would like to know what those of you who support trump will do when he loses the election?

[pigeonhed]

I do not remember any network claiming Gore won. I remember everyone thought Bush won, they said Bush won, then Gore wanted recounts and it was close. Then all the networks said ok no one won.... then the supreme court let us know that Bush won...

Lot of drama.

TV coverage of Bush v. Gore is a scary reminder of what can go wrong on election night

 

[Dognamefranklin]

I work in the oil field have firearms and love my country . So idk man be pretty bummed if that old bag of dirt Biden is in office , which looks like is what’s going to happen

 

[Test_Subject]

Anyone remember when the media falsely claimed Al Gore won? And let him believe he was the president select for ~30 days before reversing it to Bush? That wouldn’t have happened had Bush conceded and not demand recounts

I've smoked a fair bit of pot since then, but I seem to recall most of the networks calling the election for Bush and then having to backtrack when his lead narrowed in Florida.

Gore even called Bush to concede the night of the election.

 

[4Figgy]

There are possibilities, and then impossibilities...

WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 6: Michigan and Georgia, Like in PA and VA, Caught in SAME PATTERN! -- Once Biden Gained Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio - THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!

We’ve reported on multiple incidents of ‘glitches’ that people observed related to the 2020 Presidential Election. These incidents seem odd and so we sought out and found a data set from the 2020 Presidential election. A group of IT patriots analyzed a data set of election vote data and found...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[gr8whitetrukker]

There are open cases by the dozens. As mentioned if there was 0 irrefutable proof of such then SCOTUS wouldn’t waste their time hearing it out and the GSA would have certified the election by now.

https://greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf?x44644#page=26

the reason you’re not seeing republican law makers post affidavit’s is because Twitter/Facebook/Google are actively removing such posts entirely

Anyone remember when the media falsely claimed Al Gore won? And let him believe he was the president select for ~30 days before reversing it to Bush? That wouldn’t have happened had Bush conceded and not demand recounts.

If the GSA and Congress come out and certify the election for Biden, I’ll gladly accept that outcome - as I mentioned I’m a proud American and stand by my president regardless of party. But something about this smells off and I’m cautious to call Biden the president until I hear otherwise.

Yes, exactly. The legal system is at work as we speak. We already know as a fact theres voter fraud. Its undeniable and probably has always been there. The question is it enough to change the results and thats precisely what Sydney Powell is in charge of proving to the supreme court. The president is under no obligation to concede under law or as a courtesy. The results havent been certified for a reason. Too many obvious irregularities. Shes gathering her case as any lawyer would do and she wont talk openly to the media on particulars as any lawyer would do.

 

[flenser]

I don't think that capitalism as an economic system strictly requires them, but capitalism as we know it relies on them. Just look at what happens when the markets crash. Capitalism in Western societies is directly linked to the stock market. Even companies that aren't listed take a hit to their bottom line when the markets are bad because of the secondary effects of poorly performing markets (layoffs, cut hours, bankruptcies etc.) which lead to people having less money to spend.

Capitalism in theory is an interesting discussion, but I'm talking about capitalism in practice. If you were to remove the markets from Western-style capitalism, the system would fail overnight.

Could there, in theory, be a non-predatory capitalist system without a stock market where everyone is free to own capital or sell their labour and make a reasonable profit without doing it at the expense of others? Absolutely. But when the core of the economy is a system that expects infinite returns quarter after quarter, that's not going to happen.

Capitalism existed for thousands of years before there were ever stock markets. The system you are talking about is what I call crony capitalism. I don't disagree with that system requiring stock markets, since that is the primary mechanism used to move funds between corporations and politicians. I wish that system an early death, though it will likely outlive me.

You are still not required to participate in the stock markets, though numerous federal laws make it nearly a requirement. Is that what you mean by "predatory capitalist system"?

Savers who don't participate in the stock market, for example, have the value of their savings slowly destroyed by the federal reserve and its cartel of banks, a decidedly communist system (Marx's second plank if I remember correctly).

Workers who don't participate in 401K and similar plans are also unfairly taxed relative to everyone else. Those who do participate risk changes in laws depriving them of their savings. Many bills have been submitted over the years to do just that.

Save your wealth in precious metals that retain their value over time, and be taxed even more (28% last I checked) for the loss of value in the federal currency.

Give me an example of a predatory capitalist practice that is not enabled or imposed by government. I can think of none.

Capitalism in practice still exists today in nearly everyone's daily activities. The fact we are using a Marxist currency doesn't change that. You still exchange your debt instruments for goods. Do you have an alternative to that? I would like to see it.

 

[Sp2.0]

Yes, exactly. The legal system is at work as we speak. We already know as a fact theres voter fraud. Its undeniable and probably has always been there. The question is it enough to change the results and thats precisely what Sydney Powell is in charge of proving to the supreme court. The president is under no obligation to concede under law or as a courtesy. The results havent been certified for a reason. Too many obvious irregularities. Shes gathering her case as any lawyer would do and she wont talk openly to the media on particulars as any lawyer would do.

They'd be better served to sit Giuliani in the corner with a coloring book and let her and lin wood do their thing.

 

[gr8whitetrukker]

They'd be better served to sit Giuliani in the corner with a coloring book and let her and lin wood do their thing.

Guliani is the only reason this is in the headlines. We know main stream media isnt reporting on it. As evidence by many in here. This IS NEWS. What they are receiving is propoganda

 

[Sp2.0]

Guliani is the only reason this is in the headlines. We know main stream media isnt reporting on it. As evidence by many in here. This IS NEWS. What they are receiving is propoganda

I know he's getting out there with his name recognition but his delivery in front of the cameras is lacking imo. I think lin wood would be a better mouth piece and Sidney powell is sharp as a tack.

 

[Test_Subject]

I know he's getting out there with his name recognition but his delivery in front of the cameras is lacking imo. I think lin wood would be a better mouth piece and Sidney powell is sharp as a tack.

As someone who can't stand Trump or Biden, Giuliani is not doing the GOP any favours as far as public perception goes.

He's being very public and getting exposure, sure -- but he comes across as a nutter who is more concerned with fellating Trump's ego than anything.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

As someone who can't stand Trump or Biden, Giuliani is not doing the GOP any favours as far as public perception goes.

He's being very public and getting exposure, sure -- but he comes across as a nutter who is more concerned with fellating Trump's ego than anything.

Off topic. Your use of the word nutter begs the question: since Canada became independent from Great Britain and is it's own country, why does any of your money still have a picture of the Queen on it?

Neil Young isn't cool enough to be on a $20? How about Trudeau or Doug Ford? Shit, why not Wayne Gretzky!?

 

[Test_Subject]

Off topic. Your use of the word nutter begs the question: since Canada became independent from Great Britain and is it's own country, why does any of your money still have a picture of the Queen on it?

Neil Young isn't cool enough to be on a $20? How about Trudeau or Doug Ford?

Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy. The Queen is the figurehead of Canada but our PM is the leader, whereas the US president is both figurehead and leader, so you guys in the US have presidents on your money. We've never bothered to fully split from Britain because it's just a formality and Canada and the UK have a very warm relationship.

I'd fully support changing the Queen's face to those of famous Canadians but that would never fly, here. People would flip their shit.

 

[Uncle Ted]

Guys you have to admit Trump has mellowed since his lost.

He could have easily won if he would have listened instead of talk so much. Obama was a master of this, we all knew he didn't stand for anything, he gave off the look of someone that was concerned, deep in thought, but he was just coasting into that finish line. Trump should have taken lesson from this master of politics.

The boss I worked under the longest was extremely intelligent, but he never hardly ever said a word. He was the kind of guy that you could tell anything and it was never gonna get out to anyone, including his wife. That's how you keep the business going.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy. The Queen is the figurehead of Canada but our PM is the leader, whereas the US president is both figurehead and leader, so you guys in the US have presidents on your money. We've never bothered to fully split from Britain because it's just a formality and Canada and the UK have a very warm relationship.

I'd fully support changing the Queen's face to those of famous Canadians but that would never fly, here. People would flip their shit.

Thank you. That was something i've always wondered about. i appreciate the thorough explanation. Makes sense now.

 

[gr8whitetrukker]

Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy. The Queen is the figurehead of Canada but our PM is the leader, whereas the US president is both figurehead and leader, so you guys in the US have presidents on your money. We've never bothered to fully split from Britain because it's just a formality and Canada and the UK have a very warm relationship.

I'd fully support changing the Queen's face to those of famous Canadians but that would never fly, here. People would flip their shit.

Nah put the Hip on that monopoly money. Greatest band most the world never heard of

 

[gr8whitetrukker]

 

[Dax]

I believe it was this episode. A video provided

Tucker Carlson: Yes, dead people voted in this election and Democrats helped make it happen

Dead people, like any other group, tend to vote more often when you make it easier for them to vote, and this year, we made it much easier for the dead to vote.

www.foxnews.com

I stopped watching Tuck after his own lawyer admitted he cant be viewed as factual news when he was being sued do you have a reputable source?
I thought you said it was on the Nevada election commission?

Scott D. Pierce: Fox lawyers admit Tucker Carlson doesn’t always tell the truth

The drivel that Tucker Carlson spouts on Fox News isn’t factual, and the people who watch him not only know it’s false, but they don’t expect him to tell them the truth.

www.sltrib.com

 

[Test_Subject]

View attachment 138326

That's kind of a poor comparison, because Clinton conceded almost right away. In fact, Trump was the one who challenged the results because his gigantic ego was injured by losing the popular vote.

Sure, some Democrat supporters refused to recognize Trump as their president, but taking them to task on that right now is a bit of a pot-calling-the-kettle-black situation, no?

 

[flenser]

Press briefing from Trump's legal team. I found it both impressive and comprehensive. They definitely didn't pull their punches.

Briefing starts around -1:36:52

 

[Skard]