2000 Mules / Election Documentary

[Hughinn]

Look, no reasonable person can say they know for sure that this fraud would have changed the outcome of the election.

An honest man has to admit, that he cannot know that definitively.

But only an idiot could look at this video surveillance matched up to cell phone geo locations and not understand that voter fraud happened.

You could argue, in good faith that there's no way to know who the ballots were for, or what effect it had...if any. You could make that argument with honesty and good faith. But denying that it happened is the musing of a delusional idiot.

There are people on the right claiming this documentary proves Donald Trump won the election. They're wrong It doesn't.

There are people on the left like that idiot here saying that it doesn't prove anything. They're wrong, it does

It proves that voter fraud occurred. Obviously. What effect it had, and who benifits, it doesn't prove.

It does prove that drop boxes and mass mail in ballots make it impossible to enforce chain of custody and ballot harvesting laws, this compromising election integrity. That's what it proves.

It does not prove the election would've went a different way.

It does prove "the safest and most secure election in history" is a bald faced lie.

If anyone hasn't seen it and is wondering, that's a no bullshit and no spin assessment

 

[malfeasance]

So your response is more "You're stupid and watch CNN." You literally are incapable of responding otherwise even when that is the only thing you were asked not to do.

In spite of typing a lengthy post, you did not address a single thing in my post. I addressed your first claim about "Documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting, box stuffing."

Here is the post again in its entirety:

Documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting, box stuffing

Let's start with your first claim. It's false. The film does not have "documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting, box stuffing."

So why do you claim that it does?

I am starting to think that you did not even watch it.

There are videos from surveillance cameras of persons placing more than one ballot into a drop box. None of those is linked to any specific cell phone geolocation data. Not one of those persons is ever seen in the film at a seconddrop box.

Care to address any of the above with something other than "you're stupid and watch CNN?"

 

[Hughinn]

So your response is more "You're stupid and watch CNN." You literally are incapable of responding otherwise even when that is the only thing you were asked not to do.

In spite of typing a lengthy post, you did not address a single thing in my post. I addressed your first claim about "Documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting, box stuffing."

Here is the post again in its entirety:



Let's start with your first claim. It's false. The film does not have "documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting, box stuffing."

So why do you claim that it does?

I am starting to think that you did not even watch it.

There are videos from surveillance cameras of persons placing more than one ballot into a drop box. None of those is linked to any specific cell phone geolocation data. Not one of those persons is ever seen in the film at a seconddrop box.

Care to address any of the above with something other than "you're stupid and watch CNN?"

Congratulations. You've proved two things.
1, you haven't watched it

2, you win the award

 

[malfeasance]

Twice now and no ability to respond.

I suppose a third time would be useless.

There are videos from surveillance cameras of persons placing more than one ballot into a drop box. None of those is linked to any specific cell phone geolocation data. Not one of those persons is ever seen in the film at a second drop box.

But you claim "documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting/ballot stuffing."

Your claim is false.

 

[Hughinn]

Twice now and no ability to respond.

I suppose a third time would be useless.

There are videos from surveillance cameras of persons placing more than one ballot into a drop box. None of those is linked to any specific cell phone geolocation data. Not one of those persons is ever seen in the film at a second drop box.

But you claim "documented video surveillance of ballot harvesting/ballot stuffing."

Your claim is false.

You full of shit.

You haven't seen the movie. You're talking out your ass and repeating bullshit over and over.

Video surveillance of people stuffing ballot boxes, sometimes in multiple different locations is exactly that. Documented evidence of box stuffing and ballot harvesting. It's all right there. Watch it. Cell phone geo locations corresponding with drops are documented.

Obviously you haven't seen it, and are just getting talking points from CNN. BECAUSE GEO LINKED SURVEILLANCE WAS HOW THEY FOUND THE MULES IN THE FIRST PLACE YOU IDIOT

At least to any rational and sane person. Video evidence, is clearly evidence.

You sir, are a grotesque of inconceivable stupidity. Irrational and delusional mental tendencies and totally devoid of reasonable thought.

"Mules" were people "identified by going by an average of 23 different drop boxes"

The organization notes that these numbers are based on the definition of a mule as “at least 10 visits to drop boxes.”

That means geolocated jackass.

Twitter Embed

platform.twitter.com

 

[Big_paul]

Lol. This is what keeps Mesorx interesting.

 

[malfeasance]

 

[malfeasance]

The orange dots are where the film 2000 Mules claims ballot drop boxes are (Atlanta, GA).

The white circles are the actual location of ballot drop boxes (based on actual public records).

The photo above is a still from the film, the "28 drop boxes" and 5 pickup locations supposedly visited by one mule in one night. The white circles are an overlay of actual drop box locations.

Americans in general are gullible, and this film is a gravy train (over $1 million in just the first 12 hours of streaming).

When did all of you become so easy and so unquestioning?

 

[malfeasance]

View: https://twitter.com/AngryFleas/status/1524130231019315200

 

[Hughinn]

“Of course, there are ways to eliminate passers-by and county workers, of course, there are ways to confirm that the people in the videos are (or are not) mules. Larry Campbell, dropping off 6 ballots for his big family, wouldn’t be in our study. Going once to a dropbox wasn’t in our study. Our mules averaged 38 dropbox visits and 8 NGO visits. Any other combination (ex. going to NGOs and USPS boxes, for example, wouldn’t have been in our study. Or going to 100 dropboxes, but no NGOs. They weren’t in our study.) That’s how we know this is the tip of the iceberg.”

In other words, you're saying it's not unusual.

 

[Hughinn]

View: https://twitter.com/AngryFleas/status/1524130231019315200

“We have been very precise in what we’ve said. The writer makes claims and then debunks those claims with what we’ve actually said (in our testimony). If the Senator was going back and forth between NGOs and dropboxes, and if he did more than 10 times, then it is possible he would be in our study. Removing him still leaves 1100+ mules. Oh, and, very important, driving by dropbox isn’t a thing. You have to get out of your car and walk up to it. That’s what we looked at in the study.”.

Lol. 10 different drop boxes.

Nothing to see here

 

[HDH]

Proof? I cannot believe how fucking gullible folks are.

As for the second sentence, no, there is no camera and cell phone data tied together, not even one. There are some videos, but they are not tied to any cell phone geolocation. And, guess what? Not a single person is shown at more than one ballot box in the entire movie.

I have to hand it to the folks that invested in this movie, though. They knew that Americans were stupid enough to make them rich just to have what amounts to confirmation bias shown on the screen, some clever but very general statements, and let folks jump to hasty conclusions on their own and believe that they got their money's worth.

Some of you should be paying attention to what the True the Vote folks say in actual testimony and how well it lines up with the wild claims in the film.

There is 4,000,000 minutes of video man. That's 66,666 hours worth.

You can take any idiot from twitter with a false drop box map and believe them all you want.

If you watched the movie you know they arrested 2 gang members with the same 10 trillion pings that shot and killed an 8 year old girl. They used it to track the Jan 6th patriots and the 3 letter agencies use it. It gives details of the persons phone then they can follow you home.

So you're saying all that is bullshit? You know it's not. The CDC even used it to track if people were social distancing.

If your only argument is a fake map you have nothing.

Please explain why authorities in Greenbay WI are now looking into it.

The safehouse locations are being revealed. 2 of the non profits are tied to Stacy Abrams.

What you are CLEARLY missing here is they tracked 54,000 of them.

You don't think once they get them in a room and explain the charges of "Treason" and "Overthrowing the US govt" they will be singing like the little $10 a ballot bitches they are.

As a matter of fact, they are already rolling.

Have a nice day and don't be shy with your reply...

 

[HDH]

BTW, anyone else lose just about all their likes/reaction score?

I lost about 3000 for some reason.

Weird.

 

[malfeasance]

If your only argument is a fake map you have nothing.

Why would you respond at all without bothering to confirm whether even one drop box is located where one or the other claims it is?

The answer is because you don't care which is true. You are going to stick with your former conclusion and not investigate further because doing so might make you uncomfortable.


Why would you refer to the map presented in the film as "fake" but still rely on the claims made in the film?

 

[malfeasance]

BTW, anyone else lose just about all their likes/reaction score?

I lost about 3000 for some reason.

Weird.

I didn't even know there was a likes/reaction score.

 

[malfeasance]

If you watched the movie you know they arrested 2 gang members with the same 10 trillion pings that shot and killed an 8 year old girl.

I know that is a claim made in the movie. Have you looked into it further than Gregg Phillips's claims, or are you just taking his word for it that this happened and that he was responsible for solving this cold case?

 

[malfeasance]

Video surveillance of people stuffing ballot boxes, sometimes in multiple different locations is exactly that.

Please provide me the time stamps in the film of one person shown at multiple ballot boxes stuffing multiple ballots.

Or admit that the film does not show that.

This is not a high bar.

One person. Two ballot boxes. More than one ballet dropped at each location.

That is not in the film.

 

[malfeasance]

@Hughinn - what do you have to say about post #127?

This is a still from the film. The overlay of white circles are the actual location of drop boxes.

Note that this is real information that you could actually confirm for yourself. You could personally find out if you have been "had."

Or you can just keep believing what you want to believe so badly and refuse to question what Gregg Phillips is claiming.

 

[valuum]

Thank you for the explanation. My thing is that both sides have accused, and had reasonable proof, the other of voter fraud for years. Is it not possible that both sides cheat? Seems pretty coincidental that every time there’s fraud it’s just the winning team whether they be dem or republican.

 

[malfeasance]

Obviously you . . . are just getting talking points from CNN.

Haven't seen CNN in a long time. These are not "talking points," but problems with the "proof," or, for the matter, the evidence being offered.

Just because they are "on your side" does not mean that they are telling the truth. Confirmation bias is not careful investigation of evidence.