Opininons about testosterone undecanoate

why does prop, NPP, test base, tren ace, mast prop why do these things even exist? I mean we have the "superior" test e, deca, tren E, and mast E?

Tren ace and NPP, why do they even exist?
Because they were made first? Even on a medical treatment level they were replaced by long esters.

With that logic stick to the base of all the substances.

I don't get what you are trying to get at.
 
Why does it seem like testosterone undecanoate is not that popular?
I've been on TRT for a bit over a year now, tried both test c and test e, I like test c much more than test e and in order to get the best benefits and lowest sides I pin twice weekly although I could probably pin once a week and be fine as well. Now I was thinking why not switch to test u? I'm on 250mg per week and considering its half life I could probably inject 1000mg every four weeks and get the same result, or to make levels more stable it could even be 500mg every two weeks, it would still be more convenient than pinning twice weekly. So what are your opinions on this? If I switch to test u with that protocol will I get the same benefits I'm getting with my current protocol using test c? And what would be better, injecting once every four weeks or split once every two weeks?

I personally don't like it because if for any reason I had to get off test, it would take too long to clear my system.
 
I think for cruise or trt (up to 1ml/week) it's probably the best testo ester for this purpose.

Downsides are really only to load (almost a must to frontload) cuz waiting ~100 days for it to stabilize is just too long and as @Pantera mentioned, in case you need to come off, well, 100 days is a lot to think about.

Positives are one injection every 7 or 10 days is as stable as enanthate every other day or every 3 days with the latter. Less spikes of T followed by E, so easier to control estrogen side effects for some individuals. Also for those with low shbg only once a week is fine, where as with medium chain esters thrice a week is more optimal. Pip free, unlike most of the TE right now.
 
Because they were made first? Even on a medical treatment level they were replaced by long esters.

With that logic stick to the base of all the substances.

I don't get what you are trying to get at.
im saying I don't like long esters. I prefer short esters in and out. I run them, I don't ever get a limp dick, etc. they are predictable, you inject the same time ED or EOD, no front loading, you adjust your dose, you see the changes you want quickly. no estrogen build up, you don't feel good or like your cycle, your doing a different one the next day. so much easier. the only downside is guy complain they have to pin but it takes less than a minute.
 
im saying I don't like long esters. I prefer short esters in and out. I run them, I don't ever get a limp dick, etc. they are predictable, you inject the same time ED or EOD, no front loading, you adjust your dose, you see the changes you want quickly. no estrogen build up, you don't feel good or like your cycle, your doing a different one the next day. so much easier. the only downside is guy complain they have to pin but it takes less than a minute.
Thats fine that you don't. Majority of the community does.

You asked a question and I was answering of why short esters exist .


Personally, I don't want to worry about pinning if I am traveling either
 
I'm on TRT so that is my point of view, if someone needs to stay on test year-round short esters don't make sense, of course if someone else is doing cycles and PCT short esters might have their advantages as mentioned, in all the other cases long esters are a no brainer.
 
So let's say I'm on 125mg test C/E week, pinning twice a week.

How would you transition to test U?

@Cridi887
 
I was running test prop and mast, wanted some pop, so dropped the mast, threw in drol, dropped the test a bit. didn't like it, so threw in tren upped the test a bit. doing this with a long ester would have been waiting weeks to see a difference. quick in and out you can make quick changes
 
Thats fine that you don't. Majority of the community does.

You asked a question and I was answering of why short esters exist .


Personally, I don't want to worry about pinning if I am traveling either
Besides injecting every day or every other day with standard syringes (harpoons) is maybe macho to some... but from the practical standpoint nobody thinks about, how much steroids do you waste in that called syringe "dead space" ? Sounds more dumb than macho to me.
 
Just some calculations:

ED injections with standard 2ml syringe (syringe dead space is usually between 0.1ml-0.2ml, so the average is 0.15ml) it's the amount that is wasted!

- 0.15x7 = ~1ml (you lose 1ml from your vial after injecting every day for just a week!)
- 1x4 = 4ml (4ml lost just after one month!)
- You lose one vial in 10 weeks!!

I don't know about you guys, but I'm not the person who likes to waste money, resources and time. Especially in these economically tough times. You never know.
 
I was running test prop and mast, wanted some pop, so dropped the mast, threw in drol, dropped the test a bit. didn't like it, so threw in tren upped the test a bit. doing this with a long ester would have been waiting weeks to see a difference. quick in and out you can make quick changes
You just don't know how to cycle and complicate shit up like a noob that started yesterday.

Short ester have their place maybe in competitions etc. But for the average user you don't need them unless if you are a newbie and need to test tren and are too worried to not be able to ride out the tren E in case it goes south a bit.

Except from those two specific cases.... I see no point in injecting with short ester and being a pin cushion, maybe if you are a drug addict and trying to not pin your veins everyday substituting it with pinning steroids ED
 
For those of us who brew our own test, are there any issues with the raws we should consider as well?

Cost, purity, pip,etc?

Last time I had to switch to Cyp solely bc I didn’t want to risk making two years worth of E just to end up with a batch that had that mystery pip.
 
Just some calculations:

ED injections with standard 2ml syringe (syringe dead space is usually between 0.1ml-0.2ml, so the average is 0.15ml) it's the amount that is wasted!

- 0.15x7 = ~1ml (you lose 1ml from your vial after injecting every day for just a week!)
- 1x4 = 4ml (4ml lost just after one month!)
- You lose one vial in 10 weeks!!

I don't know about you guys, but I'm not the person who likes to waste money, resources and time. Especially in these economically tough times. You never know.
gear is dirt cheap, none of these excuses to not pin are valid. no one pinning frequent is saying they are macho they are saying guys using less than ideal methods because they are scared of pinning are pussies.
 
You just don't know how to cycle and complicate shit up like a noob that started yesterday.

Short ester have their place maybe in competitions etc. But for the average user you don't need them unless if you are a newbie and need to test tren and are too worried to not be able to ride out the tren E in case it goes south a bit.

Except from those two specific cases.... I see no point in injecting with short ester and being a pin cushion, maybe if you are a drug addict and trying to not pin your veins everyday substituting it with pinning steroids ED
another excuse "I don't want to pin so im looking for the longest ester possible" so anyone who disagrees,,,oh, ill call them a junkie.

your defiantly right. oh man, when I stick than pin in I can't help but start jacking off, the euphoria of shooting test prop!! I can't help but PIN PIN PIN.

clown
 
gear is dirt cheap, none of these excuses to not pin are valid. no one pinning frequent is saying they are macho they are saying guys using less than ideal methods because they are scared of pinning are pussies.
Who said using long esters are less than ideal?

You are using a dated ester for TRT. Whenever you keep talking about Test U, you keep saying pharma is behind it or someone has some type of financial gain.

I am not scared to pin, but I would rather prevent chances of scar tissue building up overtime.

There is more Data to say its essentially the same. for some reason you think that frequent pinning is much more ideal than pinning less.
 
Last edited:
gear is dirt cheap, none of these excuses to not pin are valid. no one pinning frequent is saying they are macho they are saying guys using less than ideal methods because they are scared of pinning are pussies.
Roughly 5 vials wasted in a year, you just throw away 200 euros then. Idk about you, but I'm not a millionaire, I'd rather save on little things like this. I apply this to everything in life, because when you start counting you can easily throw away thousands in a year. I would rather change car oil more frequently, buy something that I need rather than throw away money like that. Hell donating it to help people is better than throwing away. If you were living not in the US you would understand money value better, it's not that we are broke, but we as a nation are damn sure more practical on most things, including money. You never know when your income might come to all time low and with mentality and habits like this, it's gonna be hard to adapt to spending less and having less money in general. Look at the situation in the whole world right now, it's not good and don't think you're invincible, everyone will at some point experience crisis.
 
Who said using long esters are less than ideal?

You are using a dated ester for TRT. Whenever you keep talking about Test U, you keep saying pharma is behind it or someone has some type of financial gain.

I am not scared to pin, but I would rather prevent chances of scar tissue building up overtime.

There is more Data to say its essentially the same. for some reason you think that frequent pinning is much more ideal than pinning less.
your last sentence answers your first question, short esters more frequently IMO are bette than these super long esters you can't control, my opinion. some studies done by Parma companies don't matter to me. of course their studies will say their new product is ideal.

whatever happened to sust??

scar tissue is not an issue when rotating sites, not going to post studies but look it up for yourself if you don't believe me. at 450mg prop my levels were over 4400, doesn't look like scar tissue is making it so I don't absorb anything.
 
If anything testosterone undecanoate once a week is even more stable than test prop every day, at least no less stable look!

Dosages were comparable minus the ester.

Test prop:
View attachment 173234

View attachment 173235


Testo undec:
View attachment 173236
View attachment 173237
I don't trust these graphs, or understand how to interpret them. looking at a quick glance, it looks like the prop is more stable? and im not even looking for stable, is natural test always stable 100%? will blood draw Tuesday at 7 am be the same as on Friday night at 2pm?
 
Back
Top