hudson98
Banned
I just did the graphs myself on that site, prop at ED, vs E vs 1x a week, vs Test U at once a week, prop looks way more stable to me? What am I missing? You guy site appears to support my argument not yours?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok. So it's you, you are the only one that says it's more ideal.your last sentence answers your first question, short esters more frequently IMO are bette than these super long esters you can't control, my opinion. some studies done by Parma companies don't matter to me. of course their studies will say their new product is ideal.
whatever happened to sust??
scar tissue is not an issue when rotating sites, not going to post studies but look it up for yourself if you don't believe me. at 450mg prop my levels were over 4400, doesn't look like scar tissue is making it so I don't absorb anything.
For someone that states they have a master's degree, I find it hard to believe you have problems interpreting a graph that is pretty basic to the health sciences...I don't trust these graphs, or understand how to interpret them. looking at a quick glance, it looks like the prop is more stable? and im not even looking for stable, is natural test always stable 100%? will blood draw Tuesday at 7 am be the same as on Friday night at 2pm?
ooo, getting pissy, we like those long esters and anyone that doesn't say "TEST U IS GOD NO MORE PINNING" we get pissy.Ok. So it's you, you are the only one that says it's more ideal.
What about sustanon?
Do you even look at studies that have no financial conflict of interest?
"Look It up yourself". Lol
For someone that states they have a master's degree, I find it hard to believe you have problems interpreting a graph that is pretty basic to the health sciences...
are you sure you can read a graph? am I missing something here?
plug in 100mg prop ED and 700mg test U 1x a week, plot, take your screen shot. I can't link the plotted ones and im not taking a screenshot just for this little argument
Of course. It gets irritating when the only thing you can base it on isooo, getting pissy, we like those long esters and anyone that doesn't say "TEST U IS GOD NO MORE PINNING" we get pissy.
if im the only one that says it's ideal, why do sources carry prop? no one is using it. why npp? no one uses short esters right.
how many sources are carrying test u? just that one on here I guess he has that secret special hookup and all the other sources are dying to carry it because everyone wants it but they can't find it, LOL.
you don't need a masters degree to interpret a graph thats elementary school, did you pass? what is your graph proving?
ooo, getting triggered.Of course. It gets irritating when the only thing you can base it on is
"why do these esters exist?"
"Someone is making money off of this"
There are 2 sources here that carry it. Yea, that's me, I'm getting a dollar for every vial?
Oh wait. They are selling test c for the same price. No incentive for me.
"don't trust these graphs, or understand how to interpret them."
Your words, but for some reason you cant
interpret drug serum concentration. It's actually quite sad.
Any evidence that is posted by pharma is clearly disregarded because they have their money into it. There was no difference in sides according to those studies and the main benefit was convenience.
I find it hard to believe that someone who has a master's degree does not follow up to date evidence based practice or has practical application of new therapies.
You are the only one here who thinks using one of the oldest esters for TRT is better than newer technology, which isn't even that new. It's quite pathetic
Your master's degree clearly reflects it's value.
hahaha your a clownSomeone who knows exercise and physiology, you should know what the average bodyfat is 15 percent is leaner than average, even upwards to 20 percent shouldn't result in health issues, but you wouldn't know that.
15 percent isn't lean for someone who is serious in the gym.
Nobody said to run test U for a cycle but for simple trt. I have never said to use it for a cycle. I use it as TRT and slap other esters on top of it.
From your idea of medicine, over general health, and understanding how drug concentration works. It's terrible. You can't even interpret studies and for someone who supposively has 6+ years of college under their belt.
All of your comments on things you do not agree are because you lack the capacity to think more than what's in your little world.
You are just a troll
if you would have clarified this in the beginning maybe I wouldn't have been as harsh and triggered your little hissy fit. then we wouldn't be in this debate. but the genie is out of the bodies so ive already called you a fattie who thinks he's lean because "the average body fat in a society where 40 percent obese is higher than mine"... glad you concede its garbage for a cycle. if I was a TRT dad id stunt run Test E or CYP and inject it multiple times a week for more stable levels.Nobody said to run test U for a cycle but for simple trt. I have never said to use it for a cycle. I use it as TRT and slap other esters on top of it.
read the thread intro. every time someone talks about Test U, its for TRT.if you would have clarified this in the beginning maybe I wouldn't have been as harsh and triggered your little hissy fit. then we wouldn't be in this debate. but the genie is out of the bodies so ive already called you a fattie who thinks he's lean because "the average body fat in a society where 40 percent obese is higher than mine"... glad you concede its garbage for a cycle. if I was a TRT dad id stunt run Test E or CYP and inject it multiple times a week for more stable levels.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/steroids/comments/4hm9f2/my_experience_with_14_months_of_testosterone/
here's a thread I found when searching, again, these guys cite the same issues I would have with this. if I was on TRT id still use prop if I could, but would much prefer test E or cyp vs this long ester, having it to build up, and difficulty "dialing in" I put in quotes because I hate that term buy guys who use AAS and the rampant AI obsession of "dialing in" estrogen
and it looks like the doctors serving it up Don't even know what they are talking bout from these comments
Not everyone knows how to convert drug dosages from fast acting to slow acting I guess.I just find all that to be a headache to be honest, front loading, waiting for it to kick I, adjusting dosage takes forever to kick in, levels get too high need an AI, just doesn't appeal to me one bit and reading that thread others didn't like
It's not worth it to talk to someone not educated enough on the matter. We know what's wrong here, so we don't need to prove him.You do realize some doctors office give 200mg of test c every 2 weeks?
We are not shooting up every 10 weeks. I am doing it every week at 2.5x the dose.
I wish you would sit there and think about the half life of the med, dosage, and frequency this patient is getting it at.
If this patient received even 1000mg every 5 weeks, I am sure he would be a lot happier.
I'd rather do weekly injections of test u and then slap on other esters for blasts.
Some of us are better at dialing these substances in.
Use a short ester for the first time to find your sweet spot. Then match active hormone mg of that to the longer ester.
you have to run an ai at the amount of test a girl would take and you like long acting because you don't have to pin and don't want to lose that .001ml or $10 a year because your poor, we git it. yawnIt's not worth it to talk to someone not educated enough on the matter. We know what's wrong here, so we don't need to prove him.
