A way for good sources not to get lost

There are a lot of good sources that get lost within the pages of this forum cus not many people comment on them...i think there should be a place for non sponsoredyet known legit sources to be in one placeso they dont drown in the thousands of pages
 
There are a lot of good sources that get lost within the pages of this forum cus not many people comment on them...i think there should be a place for non sponsoredyet known legit sources to be in one placeso they dont drown in the thousands of pages
what do you define as a "good source"
Define "known legit"
 
I think those are the sources that decide not to have a presence here. Or else they would bump their own thread and not be lost
 
well i mean stuff like iron lion labs or oneq or monsterlabs...i have friends that have used all of them but normally they are burried a little...mfs are lazy and normally dont go past page 3 i think i once found an acttive source like 13 pages deep almost
 
well i mean stuff like iron lion labs or oneq or monsterlabs...i have friends that have used all of them but normally they are burried a little...mfs are lazy and normally dont go past page 3 i think i once found an acttive source like 13 pages deep almost
what makes you think any of those are good sources?
 
what makes you think any of those are good sources?
personal experience, not tryna shill its been a while scicne i used them and they could be utter fried dogshit now but from the latest comments they seem still legit...i just feel like its unfair that sponsors are put at the forefront only...espesially with shit sources like steroidify and osgear (ik they used to be legit but i heard they got bought a couple years ago and folowed the dark path of naps)
 
The users here bump the threads with good reviews and happy customers go to the thread to discuss gear with others. The threads where the source has to bump their own thread for attention usually fades behind the sources that people use more often because of frequent testing with positive results, good customer service, good TA, responsible OPSEC and fair pricing to name a few attributes that make for a successful and desirable source. If a source is lagging behind it’s most likely because one or more of those desirable traits is lagging behind the other sources.
It’s not because they aren’t bumping their own thread enough
 
Also you bumped a sources thread right under posts explaining that he doesn’t test enough at all. LOL
That’s why it’s isn’t he used
Subpar source for that reason alone.
Are you sending samples of his gear to Jano for HPLC testing? Or do you you use the “it’s good trust me bro method?”
Also are you the source or affiliated with him using an alt account because your bump post and this thread are both sus.
 
Also you bumped a sources thread right under posts explaining that he doesn’t test enough at all. LOL
That’s why it’s isn’t he used
Subpar source for that reason alone.
Are you sending samples of his gear to Jano for HPLC testing? Or do you you use the “it’s good trust me bro method?”
Also are you the source or affiliated with him using an alt account because your bump post and this thread are both sus.
First of all you unholy beligerent bastard he only thing sus abut me is the fact I sometimes fuck dudes, second i didnt see the post where he dosent test enough, my bad...and tbh i also kinda felt bad for the guy i mean ik peeps that use to use him but now he seems kinds forgotten. AND THIRD. Never ever acuse me of shilling thats like accusing someone of having an std its a VERY serious claim.
 
First of all you unholy beligerent bastard he only thing sus abut me is the fact I sometimes fuck dudes, second i didnt see the post where he dosent test enough, my bad...and tbh i also kinda felt bad for the guy i mean ik peeps that use to use him but now he seems kinds forgotten. AND THIRD. Never ever acuse me of shilling thats like accusing someone of having an std its a VERY serious claim.
Then stop bumping shitty sources threads lol
Are you the savior of shitty sources today?
 
I do still feel its scummy we have known shitty sources like steroidify psl and osgear when everyone knows and even COMMENTS their shit,in here just cus their a sponsor...feels shiity to me. Its like actively promoting naps
I’m not 100% sure I’m following. Do you think here we hold in higher regard sources that are sponsors? Because we don’t. There are a few sources that are sponsors that have a very good reliable track record but we always hold all sources accountable here. Just because they are a sponsor means nothing. They are just in a smaller list of sources at the top. For me personally none of the sources I’m currently using are in the sponsor list. I do know for a fact there are a couple of very reputable sources that I have used many times in the past that are also sponsors but my needs have changed and so have the sources I use. Whether a source is a sponsor or not is irrelevant when making a choice.
 
I’m not 100% sure I’m following. Do you think here we hold in higher regard sources that are sponsors? Because we don’t. There are a few sources that are sponsors that have a very good reliable track record but we always hold all sources accountable here. Just because they are a sponsor means nothing. They are just in a smaller list of sources at the top. For me personally none of the sources I’m currently using are in the sponsor list. I do know for a fact there are a couple of very reputable sources that I have used many times in the past that are also sponsors but my needs have changed and so have the sources I use. Whether a source is a sponsor or not is irrelevant when making a choice.
I hear you i do but this is a harm reduction forum as well, meaning for this site to openly PROMOTE known harmful sources is kinds janky but thats just me
 
I hear you i do but this is a harm reduction forum as well, meaning for this site to openly PROMOTE known harmful sources is kinds janky but thats just me
Yeah I think that’s where the misunderstanding is. As users of this forum we “police” the sources with reviews and blind testing, also holding the sources accountable and demanding testing on their side as well. Some very recent changes in source requirements actually demands HPLC testing. Some sources choose to pay to keep this site functioning. But the ads and sponsors really shouldn’t be viewed as promoting. I know this can be viewed that way from newer users that’s just a choice a source made to pay money and has nothing to do with the quality of the source or their products. As members we encourage all users to carefully review and evaluate the sources and testing has been made very easy and accessible. Also this section is uncensored so when a source does something wrong it is here forever for everyone to see. That’s why bad source threads are not removed. They might be banned but the thread stays so people can have the information to make an educated decision and a source can’t hide it because it’s always here.
It’s up to each and every individual to read, research and evaluate. All the information is here and sponsorship is not promoting of a source, it’s just sources that paid some money to keep this site rolling.
To edit my other statement. I have recently used one source in the sponsor list to test them out. I just realized they are in that section.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I think that’s where the misunderstanding is. As users of this forum we “police” the sources with reviews and blind testing, also holding the sources accountable and demanding testing on their side as well. Some very recent changes in source requirements actually demands HPLC testing. Some sources choose to pay to keep this site functioning. But the ads and sponsors really shouldn’t be viewed as promoting. I know this can be viewed that way from newer users that’s just a choice a source made to pay money and has nothing to do with the quality of the source or their products. As members we encourage all users to carefully review and evaluate the sources and testing has been made very easy and accessible. Also this section is uncensored so when a source does something wrong it is here forever for everyone to see. That’s why bad source threads are not removed. They might be banned but the thread stays so people can have the information to make an educated decision and a source can’t hide it because it’s always here.
It’s up to each and every individual to read, research and evaluate. All the information is here and sponsorship is not promoting of a source, it’s just sources that paid some money to keep this site rolling.
To edit my other statement. I have recently used one source in the sponsor list to test them out. I just realized they are in that section.
Your counter argument is understandable yet somewhat flawed. In what way can a site, hosting ads, for another site that wants your money, not be seen as promoting...and i feel as much as this forum tries to hold onto the moral highground it isnt infalible. And when someone buys from someone like osgear or steroidfy the first thing people say is "shoulda done more research" when in fact their research led them to this forum which led them to that source
 
Your counter argument is understandable yet somewhat flawed. In what way can a site, hosting ads, for another site that wants your money, not be seen as promoting...and i feel as much as this forum tries to hold onto the moral highground it isnt infalible. And when someone buys from someone like osgear or steroidfy the first thing people say is "shoulda done more research" when in fact their research led them to this forum which led them to that source
Go look at infinity labs....we hold bad sources accountable. Doubtful he has made 1 sale here after providing he was scum.
 
Back
Top