Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Not trying to get folks hopes up, but-

The United States Postal Service made an about-turn on Wednesday and said it would continue to accept packages from mainland China and Hong Kong, reversing a decision to temporarily halt those deliveries after an order by President Trump that ended duty-free handling of many smaller parcels.5 hours ago

Still a war on Fentanyl though so . . .
I don’t think that’s going to help the packs that are already detained.
 
I haven't heard (thankfully) anyone in the US screaming about steroids in a long time. Unless I'm mistaken, they're legal in China. It's an odd thing for the authorities to decide they needed to crack down on all of a sudden.

I mean yes it's a scheduled drug in most places. but seems to be something of minimal concern. Look at all the members here who had packs opened, oil vials (brilliantly) labeled TREN-H (lol), samples taken in some cases, closed up and sent onto the recipients courtesy of the CBP. Bizarre.
As you’ve said, collateral damage. Same factories capable of making AAS API’s make the fentanyl precursors, my (no evidence) guess is China just cracked down on the manufacturers of “bad stuff” in general as an attempt to head off some of the Trump admin actions. Don’t think they (or the US admin) gives a shit about steroids.

Again, no evidence. Just assumptions and guesses.
 
No one had to address it until this sitting president on his last term and the last guy printed 5x the amount in existence.

Congrats, you found the COVID.

I do not know where the limit is but inflation is directly correlated with the money supply. It also seems to me that we are in a very tough spot because our normal tools to deal with an expanding and contracting economy will not work here. As a side note, I think Powell has done a good job so far.

Directly correlated with the money supply? It is loosely so and depends on a host of other factors.

I only brought this up to show at least on some level that there is an attempt to cut spending.

Not really. It's performative. I'll wager whatever you like that the federal deficit doesn't diminish during 45's term.

On which part, being completely wrong?

On this part:

both sides are playing us against each other

More or less. There's the red team and the blue team, but who the fuck knows what ideologies either holds. Pick your team and then pick your enemy, all the while corporations have bought and paid for both teams.

I do have to somewhat disagree with this. To be transparent about my potential bias, this is from my role in a manufacturing setting. All I will say is they will not be able to realistically tax imports enough to make a difference and these companies absolutely rely on imported goods and materials.

I was simply referring to de minimis exceptions and how it affects folks like Jeff Bezos whose wealth is predicated on Amazon getting a percentage of most consumer commerce in the US.

Before I answer your question...isn't that why you keep tying Biden to De Minimus and ergo the crackdowns? Didn't Biden start all this? What happened to him? So, it's Trump now? Oh, that's right, you said Trump accelerated it, right? You thought April, right?

45 started the trade war in his first term, Biden continued it.
 
Congrats, you found the COVID.



Directly correlated with the money supply? It is loosely so and depends on a host of other factors.



Not really. It's performative. I'll wager whatever you like that the federal deficit doesn't diminish during 45's term.



On this part:



More or less. There's the red team and the blue team, but who the fuck knows what ideologies either holds. Pick your team and then pick your enemy, all the while corporations have bought and paid for both teams.



I was simply referring to de minimis exceptions and how it affects folks like Jeff Bezos whose wealth is predicated on Amazon getting a percentage of most consumer commerce in the US.



45 started the trade war in his first term, Biden continued it.
I don't even understand the desire to absolve 45/47 of Blame for this recent brouhaha. 46 announced a crackdown on De mimimis abuse, i.e they were going to start scrutinizing packages to make sure de minimis wasn't being abused. 47 saunters in and says he is ending De minimis by executive order
But somehow We shouldn't blame him because 46 was cracking down (but not removing de minimis?

Y'all better stock up on stuff if you haven't yet. The past 3 weeks have all been about collateral damage. More to come.
 
Just had a China Post pack clear customs!! YaY! Much anticipated Apocalyptic pack of powders! Brings the total loss From QSC down to about 850$..
1 pack customs detention 2 months
1 pack tracking number never tracked
2 orders never sent
Out of all of them i suppose this one would be the one id pick too get..(if i had to choose)
Peace
 
Political discussion is only allowed in the Political Discourse subforum unless directly relevant to AAS or PEDs
Congrats, you found the COVID.
I found our corrupt politicians response to COVID, not the same thing. You also forgot about the 2 proxy wars we are funding.

Directly correlated with the money supply? It is loosely so and depends on a host of other factors.
Yes, directly correlated. See the quantity theory of money.

This equation shows that the rate of inflation is equal to the growth rate of the money supply less the growth rate of real output. The growth rate of the money supply is determined by the Federal Reserve. The growth rate of real output is determined by resources and technology. Historically the long-term growth rate in real output has been approximately 3 percent per year. If the Federal Reserves allows the money supply to grow at an annual rate of approximately 3 percent, no inflation will occur. However, ff the Federal Reserves allows the growth rate of the money supply to exceed the growth rate of real output, inflation will occur. Thus, according to the quantity theory of money inflation is caused by the Federal Reserve allowing the money supply to grow too rapidly.


More or less. There's the red team and the blue team, but who the fuck knows what ideologies either holds. Pick your team and then pick your enemy, all the while corporations have bought and paid for both teams.
Agreed! And this is what caused the money supply to be inflated and now the purchasing power of the money we earn is greatly diminished.

I was simply referring to de minimis exceptions and how it affects folks like Jeff Bezos whose wealth is predicated on Amazon getting a percentage of most consumer commerce in the US.
I misunderstood you here.


I really think we are in agreement on most things. There is a lot at play here and the situation can not be simplified to “because of fentanyl or because of the debt”
 
dont worry guys, there will not be any issues with our shipments from china etc. there is always a way to do it. the way is to pay the extra 2-3$ then all is good. you can read about it aswell. it is only the new president that wants to mess things up all over the world. comeon
Baaahahaha... You can't be serious right now. I refuse to believe you can be this dense.
 
Back
Top