CNraws, Private source for members only

@Sampei


A few pages ago, you were right there with me saying the same thing: either Photon got sent degraded raws or he got bad raws to begin with.... and you literally said “that’s the only fucking option.” I agreed. We all did. That wasn’t slander, it was process-of-elimination reasoning based on the photo evidence and batch consistency


View attachment 325283







Now suddenly you're flipping the script, trying to make me look like I was attacking the source, when I’ve done nothing but defend them publicly. I literally got refunded. I said they were responsive. I praised their customer service. And yet here you are, twisting my words just so you can swing at me.

It’s not about loyalty to the source for you.... it’s about using the source to take a shot at me. And that’s weak. That’s not respect, that’s opportunism?????

You don’t get to rewrite what you said. I have receipts. You said yourself that the only explanation was that bad raws were sent. So if you're calling me an idiot for repeating that logic now, what does that make you???



Either keep it real or stop talking. Because from where I’m sitting, your whole vibe right now is less “defender of the source” and more “fragile ego doing damage control.”


And just so everyone’s fucking clear.... I like this source. I’ve backed them publicly, even when I had every reason not. I said I’d test it first, and if it came back solid, I’d pay them anyway... even after they already refunded me. I could’ve been a scumbag, taken the product and the refund and disappeared. But I didn’t. I acted in good faith.

So stop trying to paint me as some villainous asshole when all I did was call out an obvious inconsistency.. the same exact conclusion you yourself said was the only possible option a few pages ago. Agreeing right along with me whether you know or not

I’m not the one switching sides. I’m not the one rewriting history. You want to kiss the source’s ass now? Cool. So do I!!!! They’ve treated me right?!! But don’t pretend your sudden loyalty isn’t fueled by ego and your obsession with dunking on me. Be real

And seriously.... Sampai.
Buddy. Pal...... take your own advice, pop a Xanax, and chill the fuck out. Or block me. Either way, stop acting like you’re the moral authority in here.
I'm seriously not reading all that lol

I didn't mean cnraws sent it on purpose, the fucking factory sent cnraws a bad batch on purpose, they KNEW it was shit, they didn't care. He got fucked.
 
@Sampei


A few pages ago, you were right there with me saying the same thing: either Photon got sent degraded raws or he got bad raws to begin with.... and you literally said “that’s the only fucking option.” I agreed. We all did. That wasn’t slander, it was process-of-elimination reasoning based on the photo evidence and batch consistency


View attachment 325283







Now suddenly you're flipping the script, trying to make me look like I was attacking the source, when I’ve done nothing but defend them publicly. I literally got refunded. I said they were responsive. I praised their customer service. And yet here you are, twisting my words just so you can swing at me.

It’s not about loyalty to the source for you.... it’s about using the source to take a shot at me. And that’s weak. That’s not respect, that’s opportunism?????

You don’t get to rewrite what you said. I have receipts. You said yourself that the only explanation was that bad raws were sent. So if you're calling me an idiot for repeating that logic now, what does that make you???



Either keep it real or stop talking. Because from where I’m sitting, your whole vibe right now is less “defender of the source” and more “fragile ego doing damage control.”


And just so everyone’s fucking clear.... I like this source. I’ve backed them publicly, even when I had every reason not. I said I’d test it first, and if it came back solid, I’d pay them anyway... even after they already refunded me. I could’ve been a scumbag, taken the product and the refund and disappeared. But I didn’t. I acted in good faith.

So stop trying to paint me as some villainous asshole when all I did was call out an obvious inconsistency.. the same exact conclusion you yourself said was the only possible option a few pages ago. Agreeing right along with me whether you know or not

I’m not the one switching sides. I’m not the one rewriting history. You want to kiss the source’s ass now? Cool. So do I!!!! They’ve treated me right?!! But don’t pretend your sudden loyalty isn’t fueled by ego and your obsession with dunking on me. Be real

And seriously.... Sampai.
Buddy. Pal...... take your own advice, pop a Xanax, and chill the fuck out. Or block me. Either way, stop acting like you’re the moral authority in

I think the sample names got mixed up between your 2 reports, did you email Jano to fix it?
Yeah I let them know already. They will correct it
 
I'm seriously not reading all that lol

I didn't mean cnraws sent it on purpose, the fucking factory sent cnraws a bad batch on purpose, they KNEW it was shit, they didn't care. He got fucked.
That’s a solid clarification after the fact, and I appreciate it. Would’ve been helpful the first time around...... especially since I was pretty clear on what I said from the start. You just misunderstood it, which is why now it’s kind of ironic that the screenshots show you were actually agreeing with me.

So whose fault is that?

Anyway, I’ve made my points. I’ve said from the beginning I like the source. I’ve backed them. I believe what happened was out of Tom’s control, and I still said I’d pay for the raws if they tested good... even after a refund. That’s not someone trying to stir shit. That’s someone trying to be fair.

So yeah

.. Let’s just stop spinning this into something it never was. I’m not your enemy here. Never was.
 
That’s a solid clarification after the fact, and I appreciate it. Would’ve been helpful the first time around...... especially since I was pretty clear on what I said from the start. You just misunderstood it, which is why now it’s kind of ironic that the screenshots show you were actually agreeing with me.

So whose fault is that?

Anyway, I’ve made my points. I’ve said from the beginning I like the source. I’ve backed them. I believe what happened was out of Tom’s control, and I still said I’d pay for the raws if they tested good... even after a refund. That’s not someone trying to stir shit. That’s someone trying to be fair.

So yeah

.. Let’s just stop spinning this into something it never was. I’m not your enemy here. Never was.
Do you ever just shut the fuck up?
 
Ok these two results you posted have me cracking up. Did you mix up the labels or did Tom or jano? Can you imagine injecting 200mg tadalafil over the mix up?

Well my physique isn't showing that sculpted out of granite look yet but my cock sure is.
Just put them together right in the fire hat no PIP at all. Jano fixed the report, but I cant edit the post. You can use the QR code if you really need to see it correct.
 
@Sampei


A few pages ago, you were right there with me saying the same thing: either Photon got sent degraded raws or he got bad raws to begin with.... and you literally said “that’s the only fucking option.” I agreed. We all did. That wasn’t slander, it was process-of-elimination reasoning based on the photo evidence and batch consistency


View attachment 325283







Now suddenly you're flipping the script, trying to make me look like I was attacking the source, when I’ve done nothing but defend them publicly. I literally got refunded. I said they were responsive. I praised their customer service. And yet here you are, twisting my words just so you can swing at me.


Sampei, I’m not even mad at this point.... Just confused how you managed to do a full 180 on your own logic

You, on the other hand? You flipped just to take a swing at me. It’s not about the raws for you. It’s about trying to win a pissing contest you started in your own head.

And for what? A few forum likes? Congrats?? You’re arguing against your own posts now.

It’s not about loyalty to the source for you.... it’s about using the source to take a shot at me. And that’s weak. That’s not respect, that’s opportunism?????

You don’t get to rewrite what you said. I have receipts. You said yourself that the only explanation was that bad raws were sent. So if you're calling me an idiot for repeating that logic now, what does that make you???



Either keep it real or stop talking. Because from where I’m sitting, your whole vibe right now is less “defender of the source” and more “fragile ego doing damage control.”


And just so everyone’s fucking clear.... I like this source. I’ve backed them publicly, even when I had every reason not. I said I’d test it first, and if it came back solid, I’d pay them anyway... even after they already refunded me. I could’ve been a scumbag, taken the product and the refund and disappeared. But I didn’t. I acted in good faith.

So stop trying to paint me as some villainous asshole when all I did was call out an obvious inconsistency.. the same exact conclusion you yourself said was the only possible option a few pages ago. Agreeing right along with me whether you know or not

I’m not the one switching sides. I’m not the one rewriting history. You want to kiss the source’s ass now? Cool. So do I!!!! They’ve treated me right?!! But don’t pretend your sudden loyalty isn’t fueled by ego and your obsession with dunking on me. Be real

And seriously.... Sampai.
Buddy. Pal...... take your own advice, pop a Xanax, and chill the fuck out. Or block me. Either way, stop acting like you’re the moral authority in here.
Stfu…
 
Counter email doesn't receive emails from proton addresses. Nothing to do with sources. Is something general
Tuta work sending emails to counter email
It could be for some protocol of countermail. But, once I send email from countermail, proton can be replied then.
 
Back
Top