Yeah you're definitely retarded, we just spent the last 5 posts discussing what to expect from exogenous DHT (hyper accelerated 5AR upregulation). Literally fkkn L.O.L How many times did you get dropped on your head as a baby lmaooo
Talking about ad hominem, how about you first address how I misunderstood the study I posted. Remember that claim Tiny Tim? I'm expecting crickets...
I've clearly stated one (there are many) objective of using exogenous DHT (which your first post on this thread said was a waste of time, because you are an objectively dumb human). I can post a plethora of literature like the study I posted above (which you claimed I couldn't interpret without countering any claim I made) as to how low DHT levels are associated with negative outcomes in every single disease of neurological degeneration and cellular oxidation (Alzheimer's, ALS, Amyloid Plaque Oxidation and Cholesterol Oxidation) but I'm not going to because I don't care to help you learn. I'm probably reading the studies wrong according to you anyway lmao. And like you said, hopefully I get a huge discount because it's a huge waste of time and money lol.
You showed up. Stated that exogenous DHT is factually a waste. Which means that you know that to be the ultimate truth. At that point you pronounced your ignorance. Since then you have not posted a single reason as to why it's a waste (aside from your bold unscientific claim) for me to counter. Yet youre putting the burden of proof on me? You didn't ask me what DHTE is good for. You stated it was a waste. End of.
The other guy tried to claim that all androgens are involved in the bio synthesis of 5AR, then when he was corrected, he tried to claim that T without Fin is enough, and since then he hasn't replied because I addressed everything he thought he was saying in his two posts.
So please, go ahead say something retarded (shouldn't be hard for you) so I can dismantle and embarrass you. Go on, don't be shy lol. You wanna get into the science let's go Tiny T, pick which way you want to get embarrassed.
Self proclaimed "bio hacker" with an ego the size of texas. Never gets old.
The study you cited, is dated, and is using the ever popular rodent prostate model. Which we know doesn't correlate to humans well if at all. My statement that you couldn't interpret it was based in that fact, not ad hominem.
you never states specifically what you're trying to to achieve.
Do you have low serum DHT levels?
Have you gone through chemo?
Are you a diabetic?
What makes you think that you have a downregulated 5ar?
And in addition, what makes you think exogenous testosterone still doesn't supply enough DHT even with 5ar downregulation?
What is the practical application of what you are trying to promote?
Even esterized with enanthate, DHT is eliminated so quickly in vivo as soon as esterase clears the enanthate that DHT molecule is only lasting 15-30m.
Having the ester attached also probably won't prevent normal elimination through 3a/3b-hsd, meaning most of that active DHT is going to be eliminated before esterase has an opportunity to cleave the enanthate and allow the DHT to freely circulate.
What you're discussing has essentially zero ecidenciary or clinical backing, you cannot make any actual claims on the benefits or efficacy of the therapy you're describing.
You have a hypothesis that you apparently are planning a n=1 experiment to explore.
So I ask again, because you still haven't answered:
Why do you think exogenous DHT injections will be beneficial to you, and others?
What specific benefits are you hoping for?
How do you plan on testing your hypothesis?
Sincerely,
A ballerina