Steroid Profile Primobolan

[Nidus]

You’re lucking out in the estrogen department. That would ruin me.

Also running 250iu HCG EOD. Keeps E2 at 35-38. Without HCG E2 is at 30 and lower.

 

[Zc7219]

Also running 250iu HCG EOD. Keeps E2 at 35-38. Without HCG E2 is at 30 and lower.

I tried your doses a year or so ago and it kept me around 17-18 estrogen. 30-40 is ideal for me.

 

[Mrsteezy]

Primobolan has always been considered one of the safer steroids. It was rumored to be one of the secret weapons of the 70s that only a few pros had access to such as Arnold Schwarzenegger and some other European bodybuilders. This led to considerable demand. Unfortunately, the prohibitive price and fakes that flooded the market in the 80s and 90s changed its reputation. On a price basis, many considered it highly overrated. But in the late 00s and 10s, the rise of UGLs and cheap and abundant Chinese steroid powder allowed real Primobolan to become readily available at a reasonable price. This allowed many to experiment with higher dosages with more satisfying results..

Check out @Bill Roberts profile on Primobolan Depot, let us know what you think, and share your experiences with this compound:

Primobolan Depot (Methenolone Enanthate)

Far more powerful than its oral form Primobolan Depot is rumored to be Arnold’s favorite steroid. Very expensive Primobolan Depot is commonly counterfeited

thinksteroids.com

Running it myself now - around 400 per week - pricey but good stuff

Same boat. Currently running 400mg a week. I’m a fan!

 

[malfeasance]

Same boat. Currently running 400mg a week. I’m a fan!

What are you running alongside it?

 

[Mrsteezy]

I was on test/primo 400/300mg. I’m now on 500/400mg with 50mg Anavar for the final 6 weeks of my cycle.

 

[Mrsteezy]

What are you running alongside it?

What about you? You running primo?

 

[malfeasance]

What about you? You running primo?

Never run it. I have been trying to figure out a good way, and listening to folks like you who thought it was great, and others, who thought it was awful, to see how each ran it and if that has anything to do with their reaction to it.

 

[craigdt]

How would you all view this Primo:

-In ampoules
-allegedly "Pharma" grade
-I had it tested at Janoshik, came back 65mg/ml
-Sold as 100mg/ml

 

[BigDadd7]

I would view it as underdosed.

 

[craigdt]

I would view it as underdosed.

Genius! lol

Just didn't know if that's generally a signal that it may have other issues, etc etc.

 

[BigDadd7]

Genius! lol

Just didn't know if that's generally a signal that it may have other issues, etc etc.

It could be. I would wonder if something else was mixed with the raws.

 

[wp_375]

How would you all view this Primo:

-In ampoules
-allegedly "Pharma" grade
-I had it tested at Janoshik, came back 65mg/ml
-Sold as 100mg/ml

If the clowns who made that shit dosed something at 65% of what it's supposed to be, my first question would be what else did they fuck up and what other shortcuts did they take?

Lemme guess, it's some Indian shit.

 

[craigdt]

If the clowns who made that shit dosed something at 65% of what it's supposed to be, my first question would be what else did they fuck up and what other shortcuts did they take?

Lemme guess, it's some Indian shit.

Yep, you got it.
Indian shit.

I had high hopes for it, but somewhat disappointed.

The test didn't show any other active substance in there but I just paid for the Blind Common Anabolic Screen.
Maybe another test would show more detail?

 

[anon55]

Yep, you got it.
Indian shit.

I had high hopes for it, but somewhat disappointed.

The test didn't show any other active substance in there but I just paid for the Blind Common Anabolic Screen.
Maybe another test would show more detail?

Wich brand?

 

[Kingshit108]

If you're comparing primo to tren, then yeah... Pretty weak. But you could say that about a lot of things in comparison to tren.

Primo gives a way better look, IMO. Tren looks synthetic and freaky. Primo makes you look great in a much more natural way. It's way slower than tren... You'll run it and forget you're taking anything until one day you'll look in the mirror and think "wow".

Aside from killing hair, I've never noticed any sort of sides or diminishing returns.

Tren will change you in a month then stop, primo wont impress you with fast results... but it would keep adding and adding until you look the best you ever had and you realized you didnt even notice the gains

 

[ChoZeN1]

If I remember correctly, Pharma grade Primo was sold as 100mg/ml but only contained 70mg of the active ingredient methenolone.

 

[Banana Joe]

If I remember correctly, Pharma grade Primo was sold as 100mg/ml but only contained 70mg of the active ingredient methenolone.

Then it would have been dosed pretty much as labeled.

 

[JK1]

It seems like the oft-referenced “standard” when it comes to Test/Primo is roughly a 2:1 ratio?

From the logs and discussions I’ve read, there seems to be at least some loose consensus around that point though obviously the range of approaches is massive.

I know some end up running Primo in very small amounts, sub-100 mg, because their estrogen has been lowered too much on higher doses.

For those of you who’ve run it, did you find it better to titrate your Primo dose up gradually and retest along the way, or did you just go straight in at the ~2:1 balance and adjust afterwards?

For context: I’m someone who aromatizes heavily. On 250mg test/week i can sit at 405pmol/l oestradiol and have no discernable estrogenic symptoms. Curious how that compares to others experiences.

Thanks in advance for any input.

 

[HUGE McBIGLARGE]

It seems like the oft-referenced “standard” when it comes to Test/Primo is roughly a 2:1 ratio?

From the logs and discussions I’ve read, there seems to be at least some loose consensus around that point though obviously the range of approaches is massive.

I know some end up running Primo in very small amounts, sub-100 mg, because their estrogen has been lowered too much on higher doses.

For those of you who’ve run it, did you find it better to titrate your Primo dose up gradually and retest along the way, or did you just go straight in at the ~2:1 balance and adjust afterwards?

For context: I’m someone who aromatizes heavily. On 250mg test/week i can sit at 405pmol/l oestradiol and have no discernable estrogenic symptoms. Curious how that compares to others experiences.

Thanks in advance for any input.

My e2 is similar to yours on 250mg test.

I did primo at 1:1. 30mg of both each day. My e2 still came back clinically high, but not as high as it would have been without the primo.

Dependant on your tolerance to high and low e2, I’d suggest 2:1 or 1:1 as a starting point. Test your e2 after 2-3 weeks and titrate accordingly.

 

[Eddie.]

It seems like the oft-referenced “standard” when it comes to Test/Primo is roughly a 2:1 ratio?

From the logs and discussions I’ve read, there seems to be at least some loose consensus around that point though obviously the range of approaches is massive.

I know some end up running Primo in very small amounts, sub-100 mg, because their estrogen has been lowered too much on higher doses.

For those of you who’ve run it, did you find it better to titrate your Primo dose up gradually and retest along the way, or did you just go straight in at the ~2:1 balance and adjust afterwards?

For context: I’m someone who aromatizes heavily. On 250mg test/week i can sit at 405pmol/l oestradiol and have no discernable estrogenic symptoms. Curious how that compares to others experiences.

Thanks in advance for any input.

Best thing you can do is to start dabbling with primo at a test dose you're comfortable with and you know that if it doesn't suppress your e2, you won't deal with any issues. Imagine starting using 800mg test and 400mg primo to find out primo not doing a damn thing to your e2 lol

If you go that route i'd start with 2/1, i doubt it will be THAT potent to nuke your e2 but also you'll still be safe even if it doesn't touch it. I'd say go with 250 test and 125 primo and retest in 4 weeks.