Whistles77
Member
Some results got posted today. Probably 10 pages back lol. Just search primals responses only
MESO-Rx Forum
thinksteroids.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some results got posted today. Probably 10 pages back lol. Just search primals responses only
thinksteroids.com
Don't they post them in the analytical testing forum?Fuckin impossible to follow this source thread. Since earlier the same goddamn morning there’s 20 new pages. I’m trying to wait for testing results but FUCKthat I’m just going to buy and send it









It's not up to us to determine what makes a want vs need for someone elseHow many people *really* need any of this stuff that fast? I’ve said it before, it doesn’t make good business sense to sell before testing. I think we’re witnessing some of the issues associated with that “strategy”. Nobody’s gonna say “fuck this guy, he insists on testing his stuff before selling”. And if they do, they’re probably better served buying China oils.
When you finally understand the answer to that question...congrats.How many people *really* need any of this stuff that fast?
Thank you. Ignore my rookie ass. Also saw I can look at primals comments by clicking profileDon't they post them in the analytical testing forum?
Hello Meso,
This thread will be dedicated to all of our tested products. We conduct all of our tests via Janoshik Analytical. If you have any concerns, questions or ideas, feel free to reach out or leave a comment. We take your opinions very seriously!
Test E 250mg -> 262.13mg
Test E 500mg -> 530.83mg
Test C 200mg -> 206.30mg
Test C 250mg -> 243.36mg
Test C 400mg -> 421.17mg
Test P 100mg -> 101.33mg
Test P 200mg -> 204.19mg
Test Sust 250mg -> 255.44mg
Test...
- Primal_Pharma
- Replies: 149
- Forum: Analytical Lab Testing
He kinda copped to not testing everything and rushed to meet demand/profit.... went back on campaign promises.... has this never happened? Business as usual for any vendor spare Stanny. He should clean up his shit stains and move forward.Still a lot that I don’t get.
I think we’d all love a bit more transparency on these tradeoffs, batches, tests. I see a question about Test E and I asked about NPP too. There’s a lack of clarity about what P10 means and what has been brewed and tested since launch. The grey area of unknowns can be improved whilst still dealing with the trade offs.
Is this a fair statement? “Our scale and current demand means new fresh brews of product aren’t always tested. Based upon tested brews of tested raws we do not anticipate large variances between batches, but to reactively offer peace of mind we have a generous test reimbursement policy that we’d encourage you to use.”
Or choose a vendor who tests first. They are out there, and not hard to find.It's not up to us to determine what makes a want vs need for someone else
Maybe the day will come when the supply chain will allow planning ahead and testing before selling
But right now, it be what it be.
If you want ensured product AND ensured testing, buy it early and test it yourself
They even pay you back if you do it
Congrats fellas!! 16 pages! I might install heated marble floors in my trailerBoss says if we add 12 pages by midnight he’ll triple our Christmas bonuses. God speed soldiers!
I say ya can't have it before testing is done. If ya get 800 customers and you can only take 300 you can stop taking orders and focus on the 300. Then open again. Stanfords successful business model. If you're on point, they'll fight for you to please take my order. He went private and then public several times.Can't it's sold out before it returns
He kinda copped to not testing everything and rushed to meet demand/profit.... went back on campaign promises.... has this never happened? Business as usual for any vendor spare Stanny. He should clean up his shit stains and move forward.
Might want to visit Stan’s page and read a few back. Even he just got screwed by these crap raws.I say ya can't have it before testing is done. If ya get 800 customers and you can only take 300 you can stop taking orders and focus on the 300. Then open again. Stanfords successful business model. If you're on point, they'll fight for you to please take my order. He went private and then public several times.
P10 is what all of our original vials started with. That correlates to 001 when it comes to testing.Maybe. None of this seems so strange. Easy to pay for testing for a customer if is builds trust in the product long term. It's a healthy policy.
Another vendor today is having feedback on a vial from february and planning how to make people good. It's tragic when it happens, but vendors can have complete confidence in their products and make big guarantees.
Another big test is how they follow through and make good when they're wrong.
There's still room for transparency though. What is P10?
batch 001I ordered well after the test E was sent in for testing but I received batch p10 on the test e I flipped through the other forum but didn’t see p10 results? Might have missed it
batch 001Even the test e 250 is labeled p11?
If so will we be getting the jano results on both batches @Primal_Pharma ? Because mine and the one I sent to jano is labeled p10
Batch 001 = p10.There’s a missing batch.
1. Intro batch (001)
2. Missing
3. P11
You have what I have, as well as 3 others, have been waiting on since 9/10.
This was answered many times, NPP still on same batch as results on site.Still a lot that I don’t get.
I think we’d all love a bit more transparency on these tradeoffs, batches, tests. I see a question about Test E and I asked about NPP too. There’s a lack of clarity about what P10 means and what has been brewed and tested since launch. The grey area of unknowns can be improved whilst still dealing with the trade offs.
Is this a fair statement? “Our scale and current demand means new fresh brews of product aren’t always tested. Based upon tested brews of tested raws we do not anticipate large variances between batches, but to reactively offer peace of mind we have a generous test reimbursement policy that we’d encourage you to use.”
I think the explanation we received explains it pretty well. That you dont want to believe it is another thing. Simple fix, send it in for testing. Compare your blind results with everyone else that sent theirs and compare those to primals.“Apparently if you ordered from end of September onward, you have the latest P11 batch that was tested regardless if your vial has a P10 on it”
I don’t think this is accurate. I’d like to believe batch labeled p11 is p11 brewed product and aligns with p11 test reports, but that doesn’t add clarity about what p10 is.
See above.Looks like the deva I have is batch p10 so that wouldn't be batch 001. Do you have testing for that?
I thought I saw a blind test on it but can't find it here or in the testing thread
Yeah I fucked that one up boys, my bad. Took forever to send it out after realizing I never sent it in with the last few results that just dropped.
Should be landing this week with results:
Test E250 plus raw
Test U250 plus raw
Mast P100
Mast P200
Mast P raw
Violet Tops
EQ
I think that’s it but I’ll update it if I missed anything.
Both brother
Going out tomorrow. Those^ had already been shipped off by the time MENT got here
He only said he sent the raws multiple times lmao....Pull the raw data. Chromatogram.
Raw test?
#TYR
Yup. Dudes considering retiring until the raws situation gets better. You hear whispers of certain raws getting made again, then read stuff like this. Its wild out there.Might want to visit Stan’s page and read a few back. Even he just got screwed by these crap raws.
Yes, testing should be done first- I think more now than ever cause these raws are garbage.
We need to support testing and understand that adds a week or two on stocking.
Didn't know that and stand corrected. Stan was the only source I used for a long time but now I only buy 4 or 5 vials a year and do more peptides.Might want to visit Stan’s page and read a few back. Even he just got screwed by these crap raws.
Yes, testing should be done first- I think more now than ever cause these raws are garbage.
We need to support testing and understand that adds a week or two on stocking.
If I read that thread correctly I think what Stan said was that he may have mistakenly used measurements for a 200 mg / ml GSO product on what was supposed to be a 250 mg / ml MCT product of the same compound, which resulted in significant ( > 20%) under-dosing. Irrespective of that, the raws situation is horrible.Didn't know that and stand corrected. Stan was the only source I used for a long time but now I only buy 4 or 5 vials a year and do more peptides.
Show me one!This was answered many times, NPP still on same batch as results on site.
Dude. You haven't been reading what i've been writing. I've tried to be concise and objective throughout. Any narrative about what i believe is in YOUR head. I won't respond to rest of your comment and their issues with them as we aren't on the same page other than to say that if I'm the only cunt who doesn't expect batch P10 to be the same as batch 001 then fuck me sideways.I think the explanation we received explains it pretty well. That you dont want to believe it is another thing.
Yeah I fucked that one up boys, my bad. Took forever to send it out after realizing I never sent it in with the last few results that just dropped.
Should be landing this week with results:
Test U250 plus raw
