47Ronin
Member
I’m aware my guy.Primo is methenolone and mast is Drostanolone
I’m assuming that’s why Masterone is coded with D for Drost and Primo is M for Methe. But then why is Tren coded with R lol?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m aware my guy.Primo is methenolone and mast is Drostanolone
Sorry, what tests show this? No simple HPLC test can detect determine peptide interactions.
There are NO multi-peptide pharma drugs. Cagri-Sema would be the first if its approved, and requires careful formulation and use of specific excipients that prevent them from interacting in solution.
They react inside your body not in the vial my man. Hence jano test shows the contents and has absolutely nothing to do whith what that/those compounds will do to an individual.My only claim is that the tests show the mass of each separate peptide. So if the mass of each is still detected, what indicates their denaturing, or the lack of bioavailability, or the lack of effectiveness?
My only claim is that the tests show the mass of each separate peptide. So if the mass of each is still detected, what indicates their denaturing, or the lack of bioavailability, or the lack of effectiveness?
They react inside your body, so even if you inject them within the same 10 minute period separately they will also react negatively? At what point do they "react"? If they remain intact in the vial, and in the syringe, is it the lymphatic system that ignites this apparent reaction? Because it seems until they enter the body the amino acid sequences are preserved.They react inside your body not in the vial my man. Hence jano test shows the contents and has absolutely nothing to do whith what that/those compounds will do to an individual.
No. And I'm not even arguing against the claim that they denature, or degrade. I'm just wondering where the information is that shows this, and perhaps provides a timeline. I'm certainly not going to change my behavior on this based on one claim of PIP from someone injecting a peptide blend. But if it is a verifiable claim that GHKCu ruins the bioavailability when blended, there should be some sort of evidence, no?It's recon and tested immediately.
Are you pinning the whole vial immediately?
No. And I'm not even arguing against the claim that they denature, or degrade. I'm just wondering where the information is that shows this, and perhaps provides a timeline. I'm certainly not going to change my behavior on this based on one claim of PIP from someone injecting a peptide blend. But if it is a verifiable claim that GHKCu ruins the bioavailability when blended, there should be some sort of evidence, no?
It just seems like habits make their way through this space without evidence, and back their way into being established as canon. Like the careful way we are "supposed" to reconstitute peptides, when Janoshik shakes every single vial vigorously. Also (as said by Janoshik) the myth of the dangers of HGH denaturation because of temperature variations in transit (valid with liquid perhaps, but nearly never in lyophilized vials).Probably isn't any.
Alot of it isn't validated due to cost.
Some data makes more sense due to visible aggregates or stability pH values.
You are always free to send multiple vials for testing, each vial recon at a different date to track for degradation.
As for stuff like bioavailability etc, you probably won't be able to test for it without breaking the bank.
Why just 4. Double it and give it to the next person.It just seems like habits make their way through this space without evidence, and back their way into being established as canon. Like the careful way we are "supposed" to reconstitute peptides, when Janoshik shakes every single vial vigorously. Also (as said by Janoshik) the myth of the dangers of HGH denaturation because of temperature variations in transit (valid with liquid perhaps, but nearly never in lyophilized vials).
So while the risk on peptide mixing increases depending on environmental factors, and to a lesser degree potential PH conflicts, it still seems very dependent on how the vial is stored and treated post-reconstitution. Add that to the duration of its use and we have a best guess that we probably want to use it within the month of reconstitution, but we are not provably wasting our time by buying and using KLOW vs four separate vials that require four separate injections spaced out in far enough intervals to avoid the internal mixing risk curve.
No notesinternal mixing risk curve.
+1 he reshipped me the Tesa I had issues with next day Fedex. Already landed.I don’t know about that. He’s reshipped miss orders for people before and no one has made a complaint of being scammed.
I messaged him again tonight since it’s been over a week since last contact and no update. I will say though on WA my message is not showing deleivered (1 grey check) but for Gary and GGB it is.
not in the first post.It's literally on the first page if you made any effort at all.
If you’re too lazy to find something as simple as contact info just move on to another sourcenot in the first post.
but thanks
I have the tadalafil and it seems to work pretty well. I take a half with 10 mg superdrol, and 25 mg Winny before workout.Tadalafil has no taste
Many times its amready report that is a labelmistake and its fine you only got tadalafil but ugl tadalafil it most times not that potent
He didn't say first post. He said first page. And it's available via every single post made by this source on this thread.not in the first post.
but thanks
