AASRaw and quality of Drostanolone?

Would Mast work the same as Stano? I got an offer of Mast for 250€/100g around 2 days ago. Can't find stanolone on their site
Stick with dht raws and make a gel or cream. You won't find dht/stanolone from any ugl. I think India pharma like pct247 sells dht cream but it's 2.5% concentration. I'm not sure they strength required for your use but I remember vigorous Steve was going to do a whole video on the subject. Did you watch that?
 
If you want something anabolic and a DHT derivative, look for Primo and Mast. If you want something that doesn't aromatize, look for EQ.

If you want pure DHT for looks and boldness, then go with DHT.
Not to be that guy, but just for charities sake.

Boldenone DOES aromatize.
 
Not to be that guy, but just for charities sake.

Boldenone DOES aromatize.
Depending on who you ask, some have seen a reduction in estrogen.

But no matter who you ask, they will not put it in a "wet compound" category. Even if it is a derivative of test and close to Dbol, it doesn't act like one. If gyno is a concern, EQ can be considered an option if something else isn't available or cannot be used.
 
Depending on who you ask, some have seen a reduction in estrogen.

But no matter who you ask, they will not put it in a "wet compound" category. Even if it is a derivative of test and close to Dbol, it doesn't act like one. If gyno is a concern, EQ can be considered an option if something else isn't available or cannot be used.
No it's not depending on who you ask.
It's a simple fact.

Boldenone does interact with the aromatase enzyme. Period.
It aromatizes into estrone rather than estradiol, which is why it CAN show a reduction in E2 on bloodwork due to the competitive inhibition.
 
No it's not depending on who you ask.
It's a simple fact.

Boldenone does interact with the aromatase enzyme. Period.
It aromatizes into estrone rather than estradiol, which is why it CAN show a reduction in E2 on bloodwork due to the competitive inhibition.
In practice, it's different. How many got estrogen problems when they switched a part of their test with EQ?
EQ can solve this problem if estrogen is an issue.

At a technical level, it doesn't matter. What matters is users' experience with the drug. All the details are useless in this matter...
 
Last edited:
In practice, it's different. How many got estrogen problems when they switched a part of their test with EQ?
EQ can solve this problem if estrogen is an issue.

At a technical level, it doesn't matter. What matters is users' experience with the drug. All the details are useless in this matter...
You didn't understand the original statement. Or the follow up statement.

I never said anyone had "estrogen issues"

You said boldenone doesn't aromatize, however boldenone does in fact aromatize.
Simple, that's it, I corrected your misstatement.
It's not up for debate.
 
You didn't understand the original statement. Or the follow up statement.

I never said anyone had "estrogen issues"

You said boldenone doesn't aromatize, however boldenone does in fact aromatize.
Simple, that's it, I corrected your misstatement.
It's not up for debate.
Yes. You are right.
I have a fuck up mood now. A hard migraine with a bunch of nonsense going on and I don’t act very smooth
 
Yes. You are right.
I have a fuck up mood now. A hard migraine with a bunch of nonsense going on and I don’t act very smooth
I've been there, battling some radioactive cold these damn kids keep spreading around.

Hydrate and caffeine brother
 
No it's not depending on who you ask.
It's a simple fact.

Boldenone does interact with the aromatase enzyme. Period.
It aromatizes into estrone rather than estradiol, which is why it CAN show a reduction in E2 on bloodwork due to the competitive inhibition.

Do you have labs? For estrone LCMS(not the nonsense non sensitive test)? We have 3 on the forum now showing crashed e1 and e2 on EQ. Sensitive E1 costs a lot more than sensitive E2 (few times).

The articles I've read don't seem to be using sensitive E1 but they do use sensitive E2.

I asked TypeII but he didn't seem to want to comment. The most recent thread is here.




Even this article isn't using the sensitive E1 test..but yet it uses the sensitive E2..

 
Last edited:
I keep hearing this but I thought tadalafil only creates the 'appearance' of a larger penis due to increased blood flow - not actual lengthening or width. Is there some other mode of action happening here?
when there is more blood pumped in there its a bigger erection than less blood in there filling up a little centimeter or two more than usual.

defiently feels a little bigger on tadalafil
 
The articles I've read don't seem to be using sensitive E1 but they do use sensitive E2.

I asked TypeII but he didn't seem to want to comment. The most recent thread is here.
seems like the common consesous that eq aromatizes at 50% of testosterone is trash and needs to be thrown out max 10% probably way lower if anything at all

Otherwise, trust me, everyone would be jerking off with DHT gel.
seems like a experience report? hehe
 
I mean, I have no idea if I was DHT deficient during puberty. My shits pretty average but maybe it was meant to look like 6 tennis balls stuffed into a sock. Only way to know for sure is to test the gel method.
dick standards are inflated by porn.
 
Last edited:
wait i can actually add 1-2 cm to my peepee? i will happily take that boost essentially the only reason i take tadalafil lmao
you get extra length from tadalafil? i lose 1cm with tadalafil.

But yeah, you get temp length from DHT. the only permanent changes are more/ thicker veins.
but if you do DHT gel once a day, you can get some extra length. I collected n=1 data, and it went up by 1.7cm. pretty good if you ask me. makes a hell of a difference visually too.
e 6 tennis balls stuffed into a sock.
thats pretty good even if they are table tennis balls.
 
Do you have labs? For estrone LCMS(not the nonsense non sensitive test)? We have 3 on the forum now showing crashed e1 and e2 on EQ. Sensitive E1 costs a lot more than sensitive E2 (few times).

The articles I've read don't seem to be using sensitive E1 but they do use sensitive E2.

I asked TypeII but he didn't seem to want to comment. The most recent thread is here.




Even this article isn't using the sensitive E1 test..but yet it uses the sensitive E2..

Ive never personally done bloodwork, no.

It's entirely possible that there is some other mechanism at play (similar to whatever primo does) that down regulates or inhibits the aromatization process itself independent of any competitive inhibition. That's just baseless speculation though.

Probably something we will never know for certain since there's likely never going to be any additional research done on boldenone
 
but if you do DHT gel once a day, you can get some extra length. I collected n=1 data, and it went up by 1.7cm. pretty good if you ask me. makes a hell of a difference visually too.
1.7cm sounds hella good. i should get a accurate ruler and do some measurements myself. is the effects temp while on or permanent?

i assume you made the gel?
 
Back
Top