Does Anyone Use Maximus HRT ?

Did you ever have a phone consult with a Dr from Maximus?

Yes had one. I used Maximus for roughly 6.5 months.

I know you stated that you did not...why didn't you ask for one like I did?

EDIT: Sorry cvictorg...u were Spectrum client....my mistake
 
Last edited:
"as a Maximus client, I would like to state a couple things...for one all the talk about legality whatnot with the operation blows my mind. I did have a face to face visit with a doc, so it appears on this thread, 2 MAXIMUS clients have, while 1 has not...I mean, does EVERY HRT client have a face to face visit with a doc EVERY single time? I think not. Plus, I have a friend I referred to MAXIMUS that lives in a state where a face to face visit is required, so he said MAXIMUS can not help him because they don't even have a doc there...as for me, as I stated, I could not be happier with the service and knowledge that chip and Maximus provide me. Whatever did or did not happen to chip is really no ones business but his. As long as his clients are taken care of and treated right, that's all that matters. Maximus clients, ask yourself this - have you EVER been defrauded by chip or maximis. My bet is NO...so any talk of what may have happened with this man in the PAST is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. Have none of you ever made a mistake and sought out another chance? All that matters is that MAXIMUS and chip operate with integrity, professionalism, knowledge and sincere care for their clients. I for one, am grateful to chip and Maximus for what they are doing for me and I will stick with them no matter what. As clients, if you have had the same or similar experience I have, I would think you'd stick around too. As for you, cvictorg, I don't know who you are or what your personal motives are - maybe a competing company - I don't know, but to post the obituary of his dead father on this forum is as classless and low and immoral of an act as someone can make. You, sir, are clearly scum. I will not be on this forum ever again, simply because people like you reside here. That and I actually have a life that doesn't allow me
To play inspector gadget behind a computer. Those are my thoughts. Good day to all. "
 
All that matters is that MAXIMUS and chip operate with integrity, professionalism, knowledge and sincere care for their clients.

My biggest concern is for the clients. If there is a legal issue involving one of the founders of Maximus, clients deserve to be notified especially if it directly related to the operation of Maximus.

I am baffled about what appears to be the lack of honesty regarding the situation facing the company. The appearance of an ongoing cover-up suggests that Maximus has concerns that take precedent over their clients.

Given your feelings, and probably the feelings of other satisfied clients, it would seem that if the company released an official statement that honestly explained the current drama, all would be forgiven.

The apparent cover-up suggests there is something more serious that may not reflect well for the company - and therefore may not be so easily forgiven by the clients.

Whether this is true or not, I do not know. But the company's PR management of the crisis has been seriously lacking.

Why would anyone be surprised by the questions raised by individuals that stand to be affected by what is happening to Maximus? They just want honest answers.
 
Moderators: Can you lookbup the IP address of this kmtime? I would not be surprised if it came from Wixom, Michigan.

It's funny because before I was banned people were asking why I would post information like that if it wasn't true. The response from "Maximus HRT" was that I was probably a "competing company".
 
Oh and that talk about meeting up with doctors face-to-face is a complete lie. Please post that doctor's name and phine number please. I would like to ask him some questions about Maximus HRT and where he practices. I've been on steroidology since 2010 and there was COMPLETELY NO talk about meeting up with doctors. Anybody reading this, I urge you to look up passed posts on steroidology and you will see all that was required was a filled out form and submitting lab values.
 
"as a Maximus client, I would like to state a couple things...for one all the talk about legality whatnot with the operation blows my mind. I did have a face to face visit with a doc, so it appears on this thread, 2 MAXIMUS clients have, while 1 has not...I mean, does EVERY HRT client have a face to face visit with a doc EVERY single time? I think not. Plus, I have a friend I referred to MAXIMUS that lives in a state where a face to face visit is required, so he said MAXIMUS can not help him because they don't even have a doc there...as for me, as I stated, I could not be happier with the service and knowledge that chip and Maximus provide me. Whatever did or did not happen to chip is really no ones business but his. As long as his clients are taken care of and treated right, that's all that matters. Maximus clients, ask yourself this - have you EVER been defrauded by chip or maximis. My bet is NO...so any talk of what may have happened with this man in the PAST is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. Have none of you ever made a mistake and sought out another chance? All that matters is that MAXIMUS and chip operate with integrity, professionalism, knowledge and sincere care for their clients. I for one, am grateful to chip and Maximus for what they are doing for me and I will stick with them no matter what. As clients, if you have had the same or similar experience I have, I would think you'd stick around too. As for you, cvictorg, I don't know who you are or what your personal motives are - maybe a competing company - I don't know, but to post the obituary of his dead father on this forum is as classless and low and immoral of an act as someone can make. You, sir, are clearly scum. I will not be on this forum ever again, simply because people like you reside here. That and I actually have a life that doesn't allow me
To play inspector gadget behind a computer. Those are my thoughts. Good day to all. "

https://thinksteroids.com/community/posts/801971

you posted - "i have read thru this thread and feel the need to speak up a little bit...i recently become a client of Maxmus HRT, and i have had nothing but a great experience. as for chip being in jail...i find that extremely hard to believe considering the fact that i have recieved emails and phone calls from Chip within the past few weeks. i dont like people throwing stuff out there is just not true. it seems as though they are growing and have brought on some new people to help handle all the business, which is nice to know that there will be multiple people to help me with my needs. as for chip, i know it is him i spoke to because i have been on the fence for a while now. we spoke back in october multiple times and then again within the past month to few weeks - so yes, same guy...same great service. i just wish i jumped on board a little sooner. thats just me though."

SO - just when did you become a client of Maximus??
 
Boy - their website is chock full of useful info

- Maximus HRT

We are the nations leading experts in the field of Hormone Replacement Therapy and will stop at nothing to make sure your health, happiness and well-being are increased through modern methods of Hormone Replacement and Age Management.

Not one testimonial about the Dr - just about Chip
 
wow this thread has grown a bit since i last checked it! crazzy how google works huh?

sorry to hear about peoples issues with maximus, i would also like to know what doc was seen and in what state, because if this were the case, it would be close 100% legitimate!

some have said on the other board that they got to speek to the doctor on the phone,
 
Cvictor are there laws for prescription drugs to where there has to be a face to face patient/dr relationships established before drugs can prescribed? Since I have work with many Dr's they all require people to seen on a face to face basis before giving any kind of drugs. I would see this as endanger the life of a patient. Technically you are not a client of Maximus but in reality a patient of the establishment and the Dr who is over seeing you.
 
Cvictor are there laws for prescription drugs to where there has to be a face to face patient/dr relationships established before drugs can prescribed? Since I have work with many Dr's they all require people to seen on a face to face basis before giving any kind of drugs. I would see this as endanger the life of a patient. Technically you are not a client of Maximus but in reality a patient of the establishment and the Dr who is over seeing you.

According to the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 that amends the Controlled Substances Act:

  • “No controlled substance may be delivered, distributed, or dispensed by means of the Internet without a valid prescription.”
  • “The term ‘valid prescription’ means a prescription that is issued for a legitimate medical purpose in the usual course of professional practice by (i) a practitioner who has conducted at least 1 in-person medical evaluation of the patient; or (ii) a covering practitioner.”
  • An in-person medical evaluation is defined as “a medical evaluation that is conducted with the patient in the physical presence of the practitioner.”
  • Finally, “the term `deliver, distribute, or dispense by means of the Internet’ refers, respectively, to any delivery, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance that is caused or facilitated by means of the Internet.”
 
According to the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 that amends the Controlled Substances Act

A cursory reading of the Ryan Haight Act would suggest that a face-to-face physical examination is required for internet-based TRT clinics to prescribe schedule III controlled substances to patients.

But no so fast. A criminal defense attorney may tell his clients that this is not necessarily the case. For example, read Donald R. Cooley's legal analysis of the act:

  • The act is an amendment to The Controlled Substances Act. It specifically limits the in person medical requirement to controlled substances. Keep in mind this section begins with “[n]o controlled substance may be delivered, distributed, or dispensed by means of the Internet without a valid prescription.” It appears that Congress is not requiring face to face for non-controlled substances.
  • The act does not appear to require a face to face examination for all Controlled Substances. It appears to only require a face to face examination for Controlled Substances purchased over the internet. The definition of valid prescription is within the internet specific amendment section and no effort is made to extend it to non-internet facilitated transactions such as telephone consultations or fax services.
  • Relatedly, to be illegal, the dispensing, distribtuion, and delivering must be facilitated by the internet. Likely, courts will find a liberal definition of facilitation as they do with mail fraud. However, it will be interesting to see how this plays out and what constitutes facilitation.
  • The act uses the phrase “medical evaluation” rather than “physical examination.” What is the difference? Intuitively, it sounds as if a medical evaluation is something less than an examination. It also will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Read more: Ryan Haight Act: Internet Pharmacy Criminal Defense Issues
 
Of course, the Drug Enforcement Administration has its own opinion about what constitutes a medically-valid prescription:

According to the DEA: "For a prescription to be valid under federal and state law, there must be a bona fide doctor patient relationship, which is defined by most state laws to require a physical examination. “Completing a questionnaire that is then reviewed by a doctor hired by the internet pharmacy could not be considered the basis for a doctor/patient relationship.” Vol. 66 Federal Register 82, PP 21181-21184 (April 27, 2001)

Then there are all the State laws that attempt to define a doctor-patient relationship.

It's a legal minefield for operators in the TRT telemedicine space. I'm sure there are some that make every attempt to follow the law, as confusing as it might be, but they are surrounded by bad actors.
 
I know good Dr's require one visit per year face to face to keep people under their treatment. Other may require documentation from their Dr saying they are being monitored physically monitored if they are travel a good distance. As you mentioned there are always loop holes in the laws and vary from state to state.
 
Wow you guys have really done some digging, I'm impressed!

To KMTime
Doesnt matter if you have ever been defrauded by Chip or Maximus, He's just trying to make some money. But would you feel comfortable with your credit card info or health information with someone that's shady or has shady practices. That by being a customer could possibly implicate you and cause you to have a visit by the DEA? :confused:

It's not happening in his past! If you look up court explorer these are ongoing cases he was just arrested for in January. Obituary of his dead father is to further prove the fact that Steriodology.com is covering up that Chip Wadowski is in Jail! Because they want to keep the money coming in.

If you knew someone that was guilty of fraud sitting in jail with current cases, would you use them to invest your money and trust your private information with them? just because they gave you great service? Just wondering.

"as a Maximus client, I would like to state a couple things...for one all the talk about legality whatnot with the operation blows my mind. I did have a face to face visit with a doc, so it appears on this thread, 2 MAXIMUS clients have, while 1 has not...I mean, does EVERY HRT client have a face to face visit with a doc EVERY single time? I think not. Plus, I have a friend I referred to MAXIMUS that lives in a state where a face to face visit is required, so he said MAXIMUS can not help him because they don't even have a doc there...as for me, as I stated, I could not be happier with the service and knowledge that chip and Maximus provide me. Whatever did or did not happen to chip is really no ones business but his. As long as his clients are taken care of and treated right, that's all that matters. Maximus clients, ask yourself this - have you EVER been defrauded by chip or maximis. My bet is NO...so any talk of what may have happened with this man in the PAST is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. Have none of you ever made a mistake and sought out another chance? All that matters is that MAXIMUS and chip operate with integrity, professionalism, knowledge and sincere care for their clients. I for one, am grateful to chip and Maximus for what they are doing for me and I will stick with them no matter what. As clients, if you have had the same or similar experience I have, I would think you'd stick around too. As for you, cvictorg, I don't know who you are or what your personal motives are - maybe a competing company - I don't know, but to post the obituary of his dead father on this forum is as classless and low and immoral of an act as someone can make. You, sir, are clearly scum. I will not be on this forum ever again, simply because people like you reside here. That and I actually have a life that doesn't allow me
To play inspector gadget behind a computer. Those are my thoughts. Good day to all. "
 
the folks against these clinics, are the folks that got a good doc.!! cause 8 out of 10 of us can't find a doc. with in 500 miles that knows s***t about TRT treatments,most doc's want to give ya androgel
LOL:(
 
Back
Top