yjgenerics.com - from china

Well I'm glad you have set such high standards for noobs. Unfortunately you have set very low standards for at least one vet here. Perhaps you should be a little more consistent in applying your standards uniformly.

The only thing I've opined on in this thread, is noobs. If you're reading anything more than that in my comments, you are mistaken.

And I have not set "standards" for anyone. I simply "suggested" noobs refrain from endorsing sources, but explicitly stated they are free to do as they wish. You seem to be searching for a reason to be offended by my position. Why?
 
Last edited:
The only thing I've opined on in this thread, is noobs. If you're reading anything more than that in my comments, you are mistaken.

And I have not set "standards" for anyone. I simply "suggested" noobs refrain from endorsing sources, but explicitly stated they are free to do as they wish. You seem to be searching for a reason to be offended by my position. Why?

Not quite, it's your lack of comment that I am addressing. In other threads you and Jim have preached science over "bro science" at meso. That's fine, but if you're gonna talk the talk, then you gotta walk the walk. Jim's malicious comments toward CBH were based only on his flawed intuition. But you chose to ignore that in your comments. Your silence speaks louder than your comments.
 
I guess the takeaway from all of this is that Dr. Jim has absolutely no proof and jumped to a conclusion prematurely. He says that science should take place over "bro science" but he doesn't practice what he preaches. Now that we all have hijacked this thread to argue, we should give it back to the OP to do what they do. Regardless of what Dr. Jim thinks about me, I'll keep giving my 2 cents on sources when I know something. I am not a shill and he is wrong. I would encourage all newbs to continue to review and discuss sources. The more people that can provide feedback will help paint a clear picture of who's legit and who's a scammer. This game is all about research and discussion. Don't let one ridiculous "vet" ruin what this forum is all about... Sharing information.
 
If that's the best you can do SMT. Now there's now doubt in my mind CBH is a shill and my posts leave no room for conjecture in that regard, but you dug this up as proof I accused you of being an SF stoolie, now who's being "pedantic", LMAO!

Get a real life and return to bed.
 
I didn't believe my sentiments about SF were in question here, yep I hoped it failed especially when Stretch was the lead rep, so what!

Hey clown how about that proof you concocted. You know that nonsense GETM had given free gear to vets, more bogus BS you only dreamed of receiving in kind.

Gotta love that PM stretch I'm sure if there is anyone whom can diminish my credibility it's not YOU. Why I'm "shivering ma timbers" fella.

Go visit a shrink or start some antipsychotics because u are a legend in your own mind.
 
Not quite, it's your lack of comment that I am addressing. In other threads you and Jim have preached science over "bro science" at meso. That's fine, but if you're gonna talk the talk, then you gotta walk the walk. Jim's malicious comments toward CBH were based only on his flawed intuition. But you chose to ignore that in your comments. Your silence speaks louder than your comments.

I'm not convinced his intuition is flawed.

And WTF is this nonsense about science or broscience? What does that have to do with spotting a shill? Give me a break! What do you want.., a peer reviewed study on CBH? Please!

What's next? Anova analysis and MOE? P-values?
 
Last edited:
Wow CBS is a moron as well as Dr. Jim. Do you guys do anything besides post BS on this board? You guys talk to me like I'm a moron because i have 35 posts. I think the moron is the "doctor" who has enough time to post thousands of times on a little board about steroids. Get a life bro. People come here for info, not to be attacked by some fake ass doctor with no life. Get off your computer and go work out you fake ass Internet doctor. Sounds like you need to get laid too. Life outside the Internet is full of REAL women. You should try it.
 
Haha. What kind of man in his mid 50s has time to argue on the Internet about shills on a steroid website? You sir, are pathetic. Dr. Jim, Have any kids? Probably not. Spent his prime years on the Internet posting about shills. Loser.
 
Dadgum where is PC when I need him most, lol!

I CLEARLY listed my concerns earlier and IME many others have been dubbed "plants" with far less "proof".

Guess I will need to conduct another double blinded trial, the problem, most "shills" won't admit they are what is so blatantly obvious, someone else's boy.

Any volunteers, lol!

Beefboy do tell me why more than 80% (29 total) of your prior 35 posts were about ONE COMPANY, YJGenerics and involved only TWO threads both of which YOU STARTED?!

Why was your ONLY POST on Eroids a positive, and obviously biased opinion, about YJG.

Please explain why ALL of your other AAS company "reviews" were ONE liners at best. Like "I've used SF, CJ.. and RE..etc" but the D-Bol from YJG is GTG.

Your remaining "reviews" informed Meso listeners (as a well informed noob) you thought it best folks not use Uncle Z or Napster. Well I'm glad someone is willing to report yesterday's news, lol.

YOU ARE A SHILL, PERIOD!
 
You are an INTERNET LOSER. My first review was about YJgenerics. My second review, that you keep forgetting to mention, was about an email only source. It has been several months since my YJ review. This thread just showed up, and because I had posted a review months ago, figured it would be appropriate to comment. I reviewed this source on Eroids several months ago as well. It's not like I order juice every week. I've only placed a few orders. That would be why I have only reviewed a few sources. For a man who is into science you sure are a moron. If I was a shill why would I not post about my company for several months when I was a member the whole time? That doesn't make sense. Dr. Jim is a joke who can't admit when he's wrong.
 
The reason SOME plants don't post early on is because THEY KNOW they will be called a company boy.

You were more patient than others and waited until after you made comments about a few other companies yet finally revealed your bias with those YJG posts, duh!

STOOLIE!
 
I've started 4 topics and anyone can see this. The 4 topics are "I just placed an order", jintanilabs.com, domestic x, and "email only source". The only one about YJ is the first one. I am clearly not a shill. You really just can't admit that you're wrong... Moron.
 
Last edited:
I've started 4 topics and anyone can see this. The 4 topics are "I just placed an order", jintanilabs.com, domestic x, and "email only source". The only one about YJ is the first one. I am clearly not a shill. You really just can't admit that you're wrong... Moron.

Don't waist your time with him. His tactic is to post as many replies as he can like the ones above in an effort to bury those replies where he was clearly made a fool of by others. Just dismiss him for what he is and move on, he isn't worth your time.
 
I'm not convinced his intuition is flawed.

And WTF is this nonsense about science or broscience? What does that have to do with spotting a shill? Give me a break! What do you want.., a peer reviewed study on CBH? Please!

What's next? Anova analysis and MOE? P-values?

Exactly my point which is why any reasonable person (a researcher for example) would reserve judgement. The "evidence" at the moment is inconclusive by any reasonable measure.

I will try one more time to get my point across to you. This has nothing to do with studies and statistics. In plain and simple terms Jim claims science, but behaves like a thug. Jim is an embarrassment to those of us who have spent the better part of our lives in the sciences. Your credibility, at least with me, is at issue if you choose to comment but continue to ignore this.
 
Last edited:
Exactly my point which is why any reasonable person (a researcher for example) would reserve judgement. The "evidence" at the moment is inconclusive by any reasonable measure.

I will try one more time to get my point across to you. This has nothing to do with studies and statistics. In plain and simple terms Jim claims science, but behaves like a thug. Jim is an embarrassment to those of us who have spent the better part of our lives in the sciences. Your credibility, at least with me, is at issue if you choose to comment but continue to ignore this.


Many of the vets sit back and agree with us about Jim, SMT.

But Jims knowledge of biology, and his ability as a researcher, have allowed him to endear himself to several vets through the advice he offers on the board, and through PM. You wouldn't be quick to call me out in the open, if I were acting like a delusional prick would you? What are friends for...lol.

Jim cares about one thing on this board, his image. If you are a VET or someone with status, he still be very respectful and polite. CBS joined the board in a very professional way, his posts are well thought out and articulate, and he and Jim hit it off right away. Becsuse of this, CBS won't be calling Jim out any time soon, but I'm still glad he's here, as he definitely seems to offer a lot to the forum.

Loved your anti-anti-american posts in the General Discussion forum CBS :p


Holy Hell I missed a lot...
SO what I got is Dr. likes to call people a shill to promote his own shill
And that Paranoid Dbag, BB, is his Boyfriend..
AM i caught up?
[:o)]

I dont care who you are, THAT'S funny.
 
Last edited:
I dont care who you are, THAT'S funny.

You should care... [:o)]

Been so busy on a cycle and "manual" labor that I haven't had much time to see whats going on..
Last time I was here I got flamed for giving a status update on my cycle. So needless to say, I know who to take advise from and who is bat shit crazy. Speaking of bat shit crazy, where is SteveZab? [:o)][:o)][:o)][:o)][:o)]
 
Goodness SMT I just listed, for the last time, why I believe Cornboy is a Shill. IMO it is highly suspicious if not diagnostic of an underlying vested interest in said commentary.

Excluding any plant blatantly admitting they are a company boy, please enlighten us all SMT, what form of "proofing criteria" would you suggest most effective in identifying plants, mr scientist!

Moreover comparing the discernment of a shill on some AAS forum to legitimate evidence based research is absolutely ludicrous, lol!
 
Back
Top