Labmax test results

Since there's a super labs thread going, I might as well post these as well..
Superior Test E - PASS
Superior Tren E - PASS

Labmax says tren e is more yellow under uv in the clen test than tren a which is more green. Having pinned both Astro tren a and Superior Tren e, I'm sure they are both what they say. You be the judge on the color, lol.
 

Attachments

  • superior_teste_b.JPG
    superior_teste_b.JPG
    17.3 KB · Views: 43
  • superior_teste_uv.JPG
    superior_teste_uv.JPG
    16.3 KB · Views: 435
  • superior_trene_a.JPG
    superior_trene_a.JPG
    16.5 KB · Views: 39
  • superior_trene_b.JPG
    superior_trene_b.JPG
    18.9 KB · Views: 34
  • Superior_trene_uv.JPG
    Superior_trene_uv.JPG
    14.4 KB · Views: 39
  • Astro_ta_superior_te_uv_clen.JPG
    Astro_ta_superior_te_uv_clen.JPG
    23.5 KB · Views: 41
Since there's a super labs thread going, I might as well post these as well..
Superior Test E - PASS
Superior Tren E - PASS

Labmax says tren e is more yellow under uv in the clen test than tren a which is more green. Having pinned both Astro tren a and Superior Tren e, I'm sure they are both what they say. You be the judge on the color, lol.

Yahtzee...:D;);)
 
So I know this is too late to be relevant and I may get flamed for posting but I just uploaded the pics from my camera and I want advice on if I did the labmax correct. Tested with pep's test e from early feb. (red flip top, grey stopper) before I chucked it. Both vials initially turned orange and then there was a blueish color in test b under the uv light. The blue color wasnt really glowy though if that makes sense? So would someone with more experience say this was a pass or fail?
 

Attachments

  • test e pep lab max test a.JPG
    test e pep lab max test a.JPG
    25.6 KB · Views: 38
  • test e pep lab max test b.JPG
    test e pep lab max test b.JPG
    18.8 KB · Views: 37
  • test e pep lab max test b uv.JPG
    test e pep lab max test b uv.JPG
    16.6 KB · Views: 38
So I know this is too late to be relevant and I may get flamed for posting but I just uploaded the pics from my camera and I want advice on if I did the labmax correct. Tested with pep's test e from early feb. (red flip top, grey stopper) before I chucked it. Both vials initially turned orange and then there was a blueish color in test b under the uv light. The blue color wasnt really glowy though if that makes sense? So would someone with more experience say this was a pass or fail?
Well it wasn't that pep's test e wasn't test e it was that is was soooooooo under dosed! So it will pass but that will not tell strength. So that 10ml 300mg/ml is really 10ml@ 100-150mg/ml [}:)]
 
Well it wasn't that pep's test e wasn't test e it was that is was soooooooo under dosed! So it will pass but that will not tell strength. So that 10ml 300mg/ml is really 10ml@ 100-150mg/ml [}:)]

right. I was really just asking more if I did the test right or not because I'd like to reliably do more tests in the future. I chucked that garbage right after I did the test, I just didnt dock my camera to my laptop until today. thanks for the reply!
 
right. I was really just asking more if I did the test right or not because I'd like to reliably do more tests in the future. I chucked that garbage right after I did the test, I just didnt dock my camera to my laptop until today. thanks for the reply!
I hear you man! I didn't chuck mine I like to look at them when I need an anger boost! Plus soon I am going to test the reall cool looking primo ones to see what they really are!! [:o)] Anyone want to start a pool on what they will be? Nothing,eq,test?[:o)]
 
So I know this is too late to be relevant and I may get flamed for posting but I just uploaded the pics from my camera and I want advice on if I did the labmax correct. Tested with pep's test e from early feb. (red flip top, grey stopper) before I chucked it. Both vials initially turned orange and then there was a blueish color in test b under the uv light. The blue color wasnt really glowy though if that makes sense? So would someone with more experience say this was a pass or fail?

looks like test e to me, I do not know how much you dropped but the trick is to drop a low as you can, if it is really underdosed with small amout it should not give any reaction, this way you know that it is underdosed.

or if you cannot drop really small mix it with oil to lower the potency and then drop into the test vial,

for those crying babies that this $5 vial is not so good as $350 GC/MS testing this can indeed give some idea of potency.
 
looks like test e to me, I do not know how much you dropped but the trick is to drop a low as you can, if it is really underdosed with small amout it should not give any reaction, this way you know that it is underdosed.

or if you cannot drop really small mix it with oil to lower the potency and then drop into the test vial,

for those crying babies that this $5 vial is not so good as $350 GC/MS testing this can indeed give some idea of potency.

This is good to know.
 
looks like test e to me, I do not know how much you dropped but the trick is to drop a low as you can, if it is really underdosed with small amout it should not give any reaction, this way you know that it is underdosed.

or if you cannot drop really small mix it with oil to lower the potency and then drop into the test vial,

for those crying babies that this $5 vial is not so good as $350 GC/MS testing this can indeed give some idea of potency.
Mercury you sure about that? It test for presents of a hormone so any amount I would think would set it off? Right? Intresting idea mercury if it works like that thanks man!! :)
 
Mercury you sure about that? It test for presents of a hormone so any amount I would think would set it off? Right? Intresting idea mercury if it works like that thanks man!! :)

I am not sure how well it works I have already tried it, it is very hard to drop something very small, it was not calibrated to test potency just to detect presence.

Labmax says that you need over 0.3 mg to have reaction so you can guess, anything bellow should not react, this way with some math you should figure out the potency, maybe not soe close like on GC/MS but it should give you some idea.
 
I am not sure how well it works I have already tried it, it is very hard to drop something very small, it was not calibrated to test potency just to detect presence.

Labmax says that you need over 0.3 mg to have reaction so you can guess, anything bellow should not react, this way with some math you should figure out the potency, maybe not soe close like on GC/MS but it should give you some idea.
hey its worth a little experiment especially if someone had like pharma test cyp from trt and a ugl test cyp that they though might be under dosed. Hmmmmmm
 
Sorry to bump the thread. So there really is no cheap way to check the dosage of a product? Even if it passes the the test for a compound it could still be under dosed . That goes for raw powder as well. I have yet to try a ugl that has the same potency as pharm grade or human grade products . I noticed I need to take more of it to get the same results . I don't think it's the labs fault I think it's extremely difficult to obtain powders that are of high quality .
 
Sorry to bump the thread. So there really is no cheap way to check the dosage of a product? Even if it passes the the test for a compound it could still be under dosed . That goes for raw powder as well. I have yet to try a ugl that has the same potency as pharm grade or human grade products . I noticed I need to take more of it to get the same results . I don't think it's the labs fault I think it's extremely difficult to obtain powders that are of high quality .
I would agree with that, but some caution to some ugls might have a little better connection then another one and may have access to mass spec here and there so I would be careful just blanket idea of if I was going to take 200mg pharma I will take 400mg ugl expecting to get 200mg if you follow.
 
I understand . It just seams the when I take my usual doses of ugl products the effects are minimal. I'm am very sensitive to gear. I can take 250mg of pharm grade test and I feel it the second week .I can take 500 mg of test e from a ugl and nothing ..I don't judge test by gains . I judge it by libido . I have purchased test prop which is good in my opinion but not crazy about anything else. I think that is why some of these kids aren't making the real type of gains that Can be obtained from high quality products . Many have not tried pharm grade or human grade products . It doesn't take mega doses of human grade gear to make good gains . But it is what it is.
 
Sorry to bump the thread. So there really is no cheap way to check the dosage of a product? Even if it passes the the test for a compound it could still be under dosed . That goes for raw powder as well. I have yet to try a ugl that has the same potency as pharm grade or human grade products . I noticed I need to take more of it to get the same results . I don't think it's the labs fault I think it's extremely difficult to obtain powders that are of high quality .

According to Ricky from MFL a melting point test is good for "ball park purity levels" on powders. Labmax can then be used to verify the compound. I don't mess with powders, or I would have looked into this a little more.
 
Well I can say one thing his test prop is really good . After the first one that failed. But I know this isn't the thread for that ..All I can say is that as long as there are guys like you that test products I think it will keep ugls on their toes.
 
Hey I've got a link to another form that list all the melting point for every compounds, am I allowed to share that link on this thread?
 
Back
Top