17 Lab Reports are in - which compound do you want to see posted next?

[Wunderpus]

These results seem to contradict the testing done by a couple other meso members, who would have lead us to believe all gear is either fake or grossly underdosed.

Very happy to see these good numbers!
@OdieM
What's the UGL alternative you are talking about?

He's talking about using Fina to brew tren. Bypassing UGL's completely. A great idea!

 

[Millard]

Hey was pharmacom eq tested sorry if this has I didn't see it. So you can send sum funds direct to Millard?

Pharmacom PHARMA Bold 300 lab results will be posted on Tuesday.

 

[Wunderpus]

Pharmacom PHARMA Bold 300 lab results will be posted on Tuesday.

You're killing me by postponing the deca LOL!

 

[trying to get big]

Pharmacom PHARMA Bold 300 lab results will be posted on Tuesday.

Thanks, this testing your doing is exactly what was needed around here thank you for that

 

[jabrel3]

So nobody knows why there are no purity percentages on the test results then?

 

[rpbb]

So nobody knows why there are no purity percentages on the test results then?

What do you mean by purity

 

[Goro]

Nice alpha pharma Boldebolin 280mg/1ml

http://anaboliclab.com/lab-results/...harma-boldebolin-lab-test-results-2015-06-02/

 

[jabrel3]

What do you mean by purity

I had an analysis done on some gear a while back. The results stated that it was dosed at 101mg/ml at a purity of 66%. Meaning there was actually only about 66mg/ml. The results on the site only show how many mg/ml are in each sample. So for example if the results yield 300mg/ml of testosterone but it says nothing else, is that to say that the sample contains 300mg of 100% pure hormone? Obviously we know none of them will be 100% pure (not even pharm grade), so that leave me a bit confused as to what these results really mean.

 

[bullets69]

The results posted on the site says how many milligrams of of esterified steroid are present versus what was claimed on the label. What part is confusing?

I would assume a lot of gear produced in ugl's would have some organic impurities present at least in trace amounts. That would be nice to know just in case there were harmful amounts of some sort of dangerous byproduct. Likely testing for that would be more expensive though.

 

[CdnGuy]

Nice alpha pharma Boldebolin 280mg/1ml

http://anaboliclab.com/lab-results/...harma-boldebolin-lab-test-results-2015-06-02/

Your wet dream hey Nandro xl !!!

 

[flenser]

I had an analysis done on some gear a while back. The results stated that it was dosed at 101mg/ml at a purity of 66%. Meaning there was actually only about 66mg/ml. The results on the site only show how many mg/ml are in each sample. So for example if the results yield 300mg/ml of testosterone but it says nothing else, is that to say that the sample contains 300mg of 100% pure hormone? Obviously we know none of them will be 100% pure (not even pharm grade), so that leave me a bit confused as to what these results really mean.

Making a purity determination is in many ways a non-sequitur for drugs dissolved in solvents.


That's bc many of what most consider impurities are either removed in the OIL/AAS extraction process or do NOT elute from the HPLC column.

Therefore what's left over can be any number of substances with polarities or molecular weights that allow detection thru the use of HPLC.

These substances are detected by the formation of spikes on the chromatograph paper.

These spikes are then compared to a STANDARD for each AAS.

This if T-E is suspected based on labeling a T-E std would be used.

This process is repeated for ANY substance one is in search of.

I know what many have observed on TV the forensic scientist is handed a vial and asked "find out what's in this vial"!

Well that''a made for the movie nonsense, lol!

 

[quesawea]

Oxandrolone from the famous UGL would be nice.

 

[super8]

Pharmacom PHARMA Bold 300 lab results will be posted on Tuesday.

This is why I had no problem donating $100. I'm sitting on quite a bit of Pharma Bold 300. I haven't tried it yet.

 

[jabrel3]

Thanks for a competent response bro [emoji106] @flenser

 

[bullets69]

Its very possible to identify impurties and if they are steroidal they would show up on the chromatogram. I was just thinking for the amount of money people shell out on labmax kits they could probably do their own thin layer chromatography at home. It wouldnt be perfect but it would be better than labmax

 

[jabrel3]

Millard, when can we expect results of primo from all of these labs?

I am really curious to see testing on the more commonly faked compounds, primo, masteron, and anavar.

 

[Wunderpus]

Millard, when can we expect results of primo from all of these labs?

I am really curious to see testing on the more commonly faked compounds, primo, masteron, and anavar.

This.

 

[double-leg]

Npp?

 

[Millard]

Millard, when can we expect results of primo from all of these labs?

I am really curious to see testing on the more commonly faked compounds, primo, masteron, and anavar.

Sorry, AnabolicLab can't give advance notice of compounds to be tested.

 

[jabrel3]

Sorry, AnabolicLab can't give advance notice of compounds to be tested.

Understood, that makes a lot of sense and I'm glad it is that way. Just hadn't thought about it like that, but definitely helps keep them honest. Thanks Millard, keep doing what you do [emoji106][emoji106]