17 Lab Reports are in - which compound do you want to see posted next?

Which compound's lab test results would you like to see posted next?

  • Boldenone undecylenate

    Votes: 13 20.3%
  • Nandrolone decanoate

    Votes: 7 10.9%
  • Trenbolone acetate

    Votes: 44 68.8%

  • Total voters
    64
  • Poll closed .
Ok im really interested in this now. Do you know any tutorials ?

A friend of mine is a chemist. A walter white like guy lol. We often train together, im sure he can help me through the process.
 
AnabolicLab.com - the new independent analytical testing program for anabolic steroid harm reduction - has received the lab reports from the first batch of 17 samples. We have posted all 5 results for testosterone enanthate. We will post the next 12 lab reports over the next 12 days.

Which compound's lab test results would you like to see posted next?

You are the fucking man sir!!
 
Heard my ears ringing. Now I know why. You guys you guys, it blows my mind that yall are still getting screwed by UGLs when the best tren on earth is easily obtainable . Screw UGLs. If anyone needs help I will help in anyway I can.

Sorry for high jacking the thread. Thanks for all your doing Millard.
 
These results are encouraging, but test raws are cheap. Where UGL products get wonky is with expensive raws like primo, var, mast, halo, etc. I expect the tren and npp/deca results to be decent too because they're cheaper.

I'd love to see some pharmacom or sciroxx primo results. Pharmacom's 200mg/ml primo would be real interesting.

Sciroxx is a pretty large UGL that people often wonder about. The UGL tested so far were some of the most reputable so it wasn't too shocking.
 
Whats the routine for donating to the gofundme and remaining anonymous.
 
Whats the routine for donating to the gofundme and remaining anonymous.

Millard posted a Bitcoin address in the Underground thread, and said that a new "clean" receiving address could be provided on request.
 
So stupid question, sorry if the answer to this is posted somewhere but I'm on my phone and out of the country. Mass spec results that I have reviewed in the past showed how many mg/ml as well as the purity % of the AAS. Curious why the results on the site don't? @Millard Baker
 
These results seem to contradict the testing done by a couple other meso members, who would have lead us to believe all gear is either fake or grossly underdosed.

Very happy to see these good numbers!
@OdieM
What's the UGL alternative you are talking about?
 
Little confused why people surprised by the results. Selective scamming is around 1% from best I can tell. So only 1/100 would be horrible results. I was 99% certain all would pass with flying colors. Now later down the road we might find something. That is why we must keep this going. Soon as I have the extra $$$ I'm going to contribute. As we all should I believe.
 
If I remember correctly, all the stuff tested by Capt Forrest came in around 50%, and everything from Dr Jim was complete bunk.
 
Back
Top