Here's Mr dip shit again.
Ad hominem fallacy
On one hand he says Geo location isn't accurate enough to prove anything.
Nope. Never said that. You are just making things up, because you have NOTHING to address the real argument that I made. NOTHING. And you realize you might just be gullibly swallowing whatever they stuck in your mouth on that film. So you lash out, angrily, and avoid the real argument, refusing to confront it and address it.
On the other he says that because his Twitter map doesn't exactly match the Geo location map then it's a fake...
Negative again. I gave you the real addresses of 2020 ballot drop boxes. You can also get them by yourself before the end of next week. They are not secret. No need for a "twitter map." You can use real information. But you won't, because you cannot admit that you were gullible and fooled, and you fear that if you do some actual checking, you might have to admit that.
Ad hominem (again) geez, spend a few hours studying formal logic, not just for this thread, but so that you can exercise logic when you think. Life is better and your thinking is clearer when you use logic instead of illogic.
Appeal to majority. Same recommendation as above.
Besides, if that evidence was enough for the Georgia bureau of investigation to issue subpoenas and open an investigation into the ballot harvesting scheme, then you're full of shit calling it fake.
GBI said there was not enough information presented by True the Vote to open a criminal investigation. GBI did not issue any subpoenas. Sigh. More made up stuff. Why do you do that over and over?
Anyway, this is also appeal to authority, even if the GBI had done what you said. Formal logic again. It's helpful. Learn it. Use it.
The elections board and the Secretary of State did issue subpoenas. They did that because True the Vote refuses to cooperate <--- kind of odd, don't you think?
First subpoenas provide roadmap to investigation, with a heavy focus on John Doe witness and nonprofit funding.
justthenews.com
We all know that though. Because you just gullibly believe whatever the tranny on MSDNC or the eunuchs on cnn tell you.
I do not have cable tv, and thus no access to trannies on MSNBC or eunuchs on CNN . . . did you notice that you are still avoiding the actual argument I made? That argument, to my knowledge is not being made on MSNBC or CNN.
Why the avoidance?
What are you afraid of?
We all get fooled sometimes. It's ok.
Just check it out.
Let us know what you come up with.
Or you can continue to avoid, avoid, avoid, because you are afraid you
might have to admit you were gullible and fooled. Hey, but you might
not. Those addresses might check out with the film's map. Let's face it, though, even if the addresses don't line up with the film's orange dots,
it's not that big of a deal for your ego to discover that you were lied to and believed it. And won't it feel better knowing the truth, good or bad? It might even help your ego to know that you know what the truth is, and you know it because you personally checked it out, not because you relied on somebody else.