24k Pharma US Domestic Source

[Docd187123]

Is there any harm on mixing mct and gso oil in same vial? I haven't had any issues mixing in same syringe, but not sure about in same vial as it's somewhat long term.

Is there any carrier oils that isn't good to mix together?

You should find out your sources BA content and ensure it remains at 0.9-1% BA. You'll also screw with the concentration of the hormone.

 

[Bob Dole]

Is there any harm on mixing mct and gso oil in same vial? I haven't had any issues mixing in same syringe, but not sure about in same vial as it's somewhat long term. Is there any carrier oils that isn't good to mix together?

How do you figure out the correct ML after mixing?

 

[Gaintrain]

How do you figure out the correct ML after mixing?

Say you have test e 250... And it's 10ml... So there's 2,500mg in the whole 10ml..... Say you add 1ml of gso so now there 2500mg in 11 ml so it's now it's around 225mg per ml.

 

[CdnGuy]

Da fuck lol
Edit- only when I'm blazed

 

[Flaming Dragon]

How do you figure out the correct ML after mixing?

question should be why? better to keep them in separate vial and just load the correct ml you need by syringe. That's why I am not a big fan of blends.. you really don't know how much of each compound you're getting!

 

[Bob Dole]

question should be why? better to keep them in separate vial and just load the correct ml you need by syringe. That's why I am not a big fan of blends.. you really don't know how much of each compound you're getting!

That is what I have always done and plan on sticking with. I just wasn't sure if combining at a vial level changed the way the ML vs MG would break down.

 

[CAswole]

Don't add to ur vial. Dumb idea imo

 

[Flaming Dragon]

That is what I have always done and plan on sticking with. I just wasn't sure if combining at a vial level changed the way the ML vs MG would break down.

brother, I say if it ain't broken, don't fix it..

 

[bhog]

Got the results back today on the tren a. As promised here's the results.

 

[Flaming Dragon]

Got the results back today on the tren a. As promised here's the results.

Thanks bhog! It's a little underdosed.. but IMO, shouldn't make that huge of difference!

 

[Nutpuncher]

Got the results back today on the tren a. As promised here's the results.

Wow. That was fast. So 97.6mg/ml? Did I read it correctly?

 

[bhog]

Wow. That was fast. So 97.6mg/ml? Did I read it correctly?

Yeah pretty fast. Yes, you read it correctly.

 

[Eman]

Got the results back today on the tren a. As promised here's the results.

Thanks for the contribution @bhog

 

[Nutpuncher]

Today is day 10 of same tren a batch. this is my first tren experience. So far, no tren sides....... I am sleeping same as before. I sweat first few hours of sleep. I am on 100mg daily. Strength has increased slightly, leaner and more vascular.

 

[CAswole]

Cool, thx bhog

 

[24kpharma]

Got the results back today on the tren a. As promised here's the results.

As a follow up to this, we also received testing of our own sample we sent it. It came back tested at 101mg/mL, anyone who wishes to verify this can email me and I will provide the actual lab report with sensitive information withheld.

This is a 5% margin of difference between the customer tested results and the samples we sent ourselves of the same batch. I believe such a small margin of error is acceptable when considering machine accuracy.

This is the batch that many users had an issue with and demanded refunds and replacements. Now with analytical testing, we have shown that this batch is indeed dosed accurately.

 

[ECB]

First off LO FUCKING L. So much for judging tren by the sides. Gotta love the power of suggestion. It was full on panic mode, one after another, everyone jumped on the mental midget bandwagon.

Thanks bhog! It's a little underdosed.. but IMO, shouldn't make that huge of difference!

That isn't technically "underdosed" that is well within the allowable variance, not to mention the testing itself has a margin of error, which you are seeing between the 2 tests. The true dose is likely somewhere between them.

 

[penche]

@bhog thanks for the contribution big dog!

 

[super8]

That isn't technically "underdosed" that is well within the allowable variance, not to mention the testing itself has a margin of error, which you are seeing between the 2 tests. The true dose is likely somewhere between them.

Yep, this batch was spot on. Hell I'd be happy with 90mg/ml. Remember this is a small cheap domestic UGL folks..

 

[Sucuenito]

As a follow up to this, we also received testing of our own sample we sent it. It came back tested at 101mg/mL, anyone who wishes to verify this can email me and I will provide the actual lab report with sensitive information withheld.

This is a 5% margin of difference between the customer tested results and the samples we sent ourselves of the same batch. I believe such a small margin of error is acceptable when considering machine accuracy.

This is the batch that many users had an issue with and demanded refunds and replacements. Now with analytical testing, we have shown that this batch is indeed dosed accurately.

24k pharma I send you an email early! No reply