I'm also wondering. ....
Why would this Source have a customer send payment to his "Supplier" in china (not receiver)? Did he actually want the customer to send funds to his "Raw Supplier"? If so, then that's odd. You ultimately put a customer in jeopardy (distribution vs casual user) dealing with your raw supplier. A situation that you should be doing yourself.
The source claim to have his/her email hacked...
If the sources email supposedly was hacked, how come there's no other member or person/s making these accusations? I guess using the excuse "My email got hacked" relieves you from your responsibility. I guess business is slow...lol
Hope someone can clear this up for me.
@Flounder don't go anywhere....lol
Why would this Source have a customer send payment to his "Supplier" in china (not receiver)? Did he actually want the customer to send funds to his "Raw Supplier"? If so, then that's odd. You ultimately put a customer in jeopardy (distribution vs casual user) dealing with your raw supplier. A situation that you should be doing yourself.
The source claim to have his/her email hacked...
If the sources email supposedly was hacked, how come there's no other member or person/s making these accusations? I guess using the excuse "My email got hacked" relieves you from your responsibility. I guess business is slow...lol
Hope someone can clear this up for me.
@Flounder don't go anywhere....lol