All that goes to show is that once again, experience does not equal knowledge unfortunately.
ALL doses of tren are supraphysiological doses. Even 1mg of tren is a supraphysiological dose bc the body does not produce tren hence there being no physiological dose.
Unfortunately n=1 with bloodwork is not proof of anything. It's an anecdote. Nevertheless, blood work is important to do and I have had it done as well.
Since you want to be snide with this comment I'll do the same. Had m you known anything about scientific journals you'd know JISSN doesn't deal with trenbolone, they deal with other things.
I've had years of experience with tren as well. In fact, I've brewed my own as evidenced here.
View attachment 67825
View attachment 67826
I've ran low tren, high tren, low test and low tren, low test high tren, high test low tren, high test and high tren, and probably whatever other combination your mind can come up with. I have neither the time nor the inclination (nor enough Ben and Jerry's Half Baked ice cream) to go into detail on all 17 or 18 points of contention I listed nor do I have the incentive to spoon feed you them since most are easily researched. Pick a few points and I'll expand on them.
For now:
He says prami and caber are prolactin antagonists which means they bind to the prolactin receptor and prevent it from activating. This is pure nonsense. Prami and caber are DOPAMINE agonists bc they bind to dopamine receptors and activate them. Just bc they reduce prolactin in no way, shape, or form suggest they are prolactin antagonists. That's just 101 level stuff that anyone should know, ESPECIALLY after the 5 years of experience.
Then he goes on about HCG permanently preventing LH secretion from the pituitary. There is not one single documented case of this ever happening in the literature even from ppl being on it for 12 months straight at high doses. He probably made a mistake and meant leydig cell desensitization from HCG but then again, that too is a load of crap and has never happened. I'll be generous and let you pick which one he is wrong about: either the incorrect actual assertion he incorrectly wrote or the incorrect assertion he meant to say.