Anabolic Solutions (AS Labs) Equipoise - HPLC/TAMC/TYMC - 2017-07 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

[MindlessWork]

Yes, it helps. It helps clarify that you're a fucking idiot that has no clue what he's talking about.

What country are you from, masterbot?

Mars, I presume

 

[master.on]

Mars, I presume

CA, PA or TX?
Outingdale, California - Wikipedia
Mars, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia
Mars, Texas - Wikipedia


No changing subjects is allowed
Positively AL must begin testing raws.

 

[MindlessWork]

CA, PA or TX?
Outingdale, California - Wikipedia
Mars, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia
Mars, Texas - Wikipedia


No changing subjects is allowed
Positively AL must begin testing raws.

You have to be from another planet

 

[master.on]

You have to be from another planet

http://gizmodo.com/will-intelligent-aliens-actually-care-about-us-at-all-1795029304

No changing subjects is allowed
Positively AL must begin testing raws.

 

[XmadXscientist]

hahaha a bunch of unemployable losers
ended up shilling for moldovans

listen up pathetic losers
here are FDA guidelines

Pharmaceutical Quality Control Labs (7/93)
Methods can be validated in a number of ways. Methods appearing in the USP are considered validated and they are considered validated if part of an approved ANDA.

17. RAW MATERIAL TESTING
Some inspections include the coverage of the manufacturer of the drug substance. The safety and efficacy of the finished dosage form is largely dependent on the purity and quality of the bulk active drug substance. Examine the raw data reflecting the analysis of the drug substance including purity tests, charts, etc.

Check the impurity profiles of the BPC used in the biobatch and clinical production batches to determine if it is the same as that being used to manufacture full scale production batches. Determine if the manufacturer has a program to audit the certificate of analysis of the BPC, and, if so, check the results of these tests. Report findings where there is substantial difference in impurity profiles and other test results.

Some older compendial methods may not be capable of detecting impurities as necessary to enable the control of the manufacturing process, and newer methods have been developed to test these products. Such methods must be validated to ensure that they are adequate for analytical purposes in the control and validation of the BPC manufacturing process. The drug substance manufacturer must have complete knowledge of the manufacturing process and the potential impurities that may appear in the drug substance. These impurities cannot be evaluated without a suitable method and one that has been validated.

Physical tests such as particle size for raw materials, adhesion tests for patches, and extrusion tests for syringes are essential tests to assure consistent operation of the production and control system and to assure quality and efficacy. Some of these tests are filed in applications and others may be established by the protocols used to manufacture the product. The validation of methods for such tests are as important as the test for chemical attributes.

Physical properties tests often require the use of unique equipment and protocols. These tests may not be reproducible in other laboratories, therefore, on site evaluation is essential.


for you ignorant fucks, first read what a pharmacopeia is
Pharmacopoeia - Wikipedia
United States Pharmacopeia - Wikipedia

Product quality–standards and verification[edit]
USP establishes written (documentary) and physical (reference) standards for medicines, food ingredients, dietary supplement products, and ingredients. These standards are used by regulatory agencies and manufacturers to help to ensure that these products are of the appropriate identity, as well as strength, quality, purity, and consistency.
Prescription and over-the-counter medicines available in the United States must, by federal law, meet USP-NF public standards, where such standards exist. Many other countries use the USP-NF instead of issuing their own pharmacopeia, or to supplement their government pharmacopeia.


There ARE USP entries for most human steroids
USP Monographs for Bulk Drug Substances and Other Ingredients | USP

While there is no USP monograph for boldenone
it's VALID HPLC testing method is here, written by none less than the
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
http://www.ijppsjournal.com/Vol6Suppl2/6533.pdf
As you can see SIMEC should have tested for 7 related impurities A-G, they didn't

Without impurity tests, it's perfectly possible for UGLs to conceal impure raws by overdosing/overcompensating

Ah hahahahahaha omg your so fucking stupid again you literally quoted some random shit that did NOTHING to support your whole the raws are subpar theory and instead tried to deflect attention with insults. Post your damn proof buttfuck!

For the record I work in a field you could never comprehend.

Stop pushing your agenda and test your raws yourself.

Oh and we're dealing with illegal underground labs so the whole needs to be within FDA percentages is kind of moot. We want the product we're told is in the bottle and while I agree that the overdosing probably means the hillbilly brewing the gear isn't super technical people only care that it has at least the active amount of marketed ingredient. Overdosing may be a problem yeah but at least they're putting out what they say is in there contaminant free.

Since you live in your moms basement you should be able to afford your own raws testing. I know those tranny hookers take you for a lot but maybe lay off the booze one weekend and save that cash for raw tested.

Try to form a semi-intelligent response, but I won't hold my breath.

 

[XmadXscientist]

No changing subjects is allowed

Fuck I didn't know you were the internet police!

 

[Ripped]

Once again you copy and paste something because you have zero knowledge outside of Google.
I thought Noah was dumb you definitely have him beat.

AL, will not be testing raws.

 

[janoshik]

Fuck I didn't know you were the internet police!

That's a new one on meso, lol

At least he has a sense of humor

 

[stone988]

It really amazes me, first its the gear is fake, then its another compound, next its under dosed, now its contaminates lmao Really? Oh and now its over dosed to hide impurities. Give me a fucking break!

 

[XmadXscientist]

It really amazes me, first its the gear is fake, then its another compound, next its under dosed, now its contaminates lmao Really? Oh and now its over dosed to hide impurities. Give me a fucking break!

Yeah but they didn't "feel it"

 

[Ripped]

It really amazes me, first its the gear is fake, then its another compound, next its under dosed, now its contaminates lmao Really? Oh and now its over dosed to hide impurities. Give me a fucking break!

He never seems to not amaze me just when you think he is out of stupid shit.
He starts posting alot more. Lmao

 

[master.on]

It really amazes me, first its the gear is fake, then its another compound, next its under dosed, now its contaminates lmao Really? Oh and now its over dosed to hide impurities. Give me a fucking break!

He never seems to not amaze me just when you think he is out of stupid shit.
He starts posting alot more. Lmao

Thank you for proving you're shills on moldova payroll
Talk about vested interest in having raws never tested.

 

[XmadXscientist]

Thank you for proving you're shills on moldova payroll
Talk about vested interest in having raws never tested.

And how exactly would we know where said raws come from? Ask resellers to start branding their products? Order directly from factory? How do you know you'll be testing the same raws as the ugl in question? You think a group testing raw powders and providing that info to the public isn't going to become public enemy #1 in short order?

 

[stone988]

Raws ? lol Im a gym rat could give a fuck about moldovia or wherever just get me good gear!