Anabolx.com - source lab changes

My brother started today his cycle. No problems with tops, at the momentView attachment 62984View attachment 62985View attachment 62986

Brother, I understand that it can be frustrating when it appears that members are piling on to a source that you like and trust, but you've gotta let Meso do its thing.

Not only do your white-knight posts make you seem suspect of being in cahoots with this lab, it makes anabolx and/or sqs seem suspect of sending someone one in to write these reviews espousing how wonderful they are.

There's always room for improvement and suggestions and/or complaints are ways to make this happen. If no one complained about the pip in npp, what do you think would have happened? (that was a rhetorical question).
 
Brother, I understand that it can be frustrating when it appears that members are piling on to a source that you like and trust, but you've gotta let Meso do its thing.

Not only do your white-knight posts make you seem suspect of being in cahoots with this lab, it makes anabolx and/or sqs seem suspect of sending someone one in to write these reviews espousing how wonderful they are.

There's always room for improvement and suggestions and/or complaints are ways to make this happen. If no one complained about the pip in npp, what do you think would have happened? (that was a rhetorical question).

[emoji817] likes!!!
 
I personally have a pet peeve about tops. I don't want the alcohol swabs to snag the top sharp points. Like my Watson vial is can twist or sweep the top with a swab and no snagging. Makes cleaning easier.

Haven't order from here at all yet actually. I don't even k ow if he's domestic. Im assuming not.
 
I personally have a pet peeve about tops. I don't want the alcohol swabs to snag the top sharp points. Like my Watson vial is can twist or sweep the top with a swab and no snagging. Makes cleaning easier.

Haven't order from here at all yet actually. I don't even k ow if he's domestic. Im assuming not.
Agree about the tops and yes, domestic. T/A is FAF!
 
2nd lab I've seen with lower-than-expected tt while running test e. Just an observation... Same raw supplier?

Edit:
@anabolx perhaps you can have this information passed on to the raw supplier. Maybe the other lab will do the same and if it's the same supplier...
 
Last edited:
2nd lab I've seen with lower-than-expected tt while running test e. Just an observation... Same raw supplier?

@anabolx perhaps you can have this information passed on to the raw supplier. Maybe the other lab will do the same and if it's the same supplier...
That was the first thing that came to mind
 
@JJ408G everyone who ordered NPP from the last batch (From February) will receive a store credit for the NPP or if he wants to wait for the new batch.

@Weston these from the same batch sf_49ers ran, his results were good. but I'll forward that to SQS anyway. their raw supplier is the same in the those lab tests.
 
@JJ408G everyone who ordered NPP from the last batch (From February) will receive a store credit for the NPP or if he wants to wait for the new batch.

@Weston these from the same batch sf_49ers ran, his results were good. but I'll forward that to SQS anyway. their raw supplier is the same in the those lab tests.

You're the man. Thanks. Again, it was just a thought and could be nothing. It only got my attention because, like I said earlier, there was another lab with allegedly the same issue.
 
Back
Top