Hey guys, any easy way to tell if a vial of something used mig as the carrier oil vs mct? Asking because I know the lab had used mct but switched to mig around the time this was purchased so I'm unsure which it is. I am unable to contact the lab
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why would 3 separate labs, all using mig cause immense pip not experienced with other carrier oils? One lab used gso, switched to mig, then switched back after complaints. Both before and after wirh gso was pain free where as the mig was crippling
I've had it where the brewer used the same ratios, same bottles of solvents and same raws.....mct was painless and mig was crippling. I completely understand what you're saying and on paper by all means mig shouldn't cause any pipMiglyol840 ( and others ) is only modify. of MCT oil. Understand that could be some lumps , but not a crypling pain. My experiences with Mig is that pain is caused by
- PH of subsatnce ( RAW contains too much residual acids )
- BA / BB - must be good quality ( I know that some brewers using technical quality, because is cheaper and they have no source of better quality solvents )
Example - BA from UKlabsupply ( dont know if they still exist ) was different consistency and smell like BA what I have now ( now I have the best quality, and its more thin,watery and another smell like my previous BA.
Ive been curious about the 810 for awhile now . Its got a similar viscosity to traditional mct so i wonder if it still has the same properties as 840 as far as its ability to hold higher concentration or low solvent brews and such .I have 810 I will brew some today with it if it does what the 840 did to me I will know it's the miglyol.
But I have a Theory that sources were using 840 which isn't as suitable for a carrier as 810/812 which are both listed as pharma mct.
I can say 840 was terrible the first time I tried it and I have a very good tolerance for pain it turned the muscle rock hard and hurt for 2 weeks.
I apologize for posting couldn't resist the conversation.
Yes it's going to be test c that's what give me the pip it was actually test c and ace.Ive been curious about the 810 for awhile now . Its got a similar viscosity to traditional mct so i wonder if it still has the same properties as 840 as far as its ability to hold higher concentration or low solvent brews and such .
Just outta curiosity what are you gonna brew with the 810 @PurplePandaLabs Rep. ? Is it gonna be something you used w/840 and got pip from ? Just my thought , but would be the best way to know it was the miglyol and not the raws or some other variable that caused the pip .

Not another one with bad fill LevelsView attachment 91531
250mg/ml Test c
1% BA
22%BB
Carrier migyol 810
I will pin soon and give feedback.
@Evom1
@LordSamuilo
Yeah that or medlab carries it also.Where are all of you guys getting mig from?
Peter?
I pinned the first shot with the migyol 810 today the only variables would probably be the ratios but I can say 840 tore my ass up I just wanted to do this experiment to see if 810 is in fact more suitable for a carrier.I've had it where the brewer used the same ratios, same bottles of solvents and same raws.....mct was painless and mig was crippling. I completely understand what you're saying and on paper by all means mig shouldn't cause any pip
I pinned the first shot with the migyol 810 today the only variables would probably be the ratios but I can say 840 tore my ass up I just wanted to do this experiment to see if 810 is in fact more suitable for a carrier.
Sry to hi jack your thread I believe you were one of the guy's that was interested in the outcome.
4 hours post injection and no knots or soreness at all.i think we can make an exception in this case. You're contributing quality content to this thread (IMO) so i won't be one to tell you to get back in your thread.
So? Did the M810 treat you better than the M840?
