I can point you in the direction to get mass spec testing.
==from an Eroids lab sponsor ===
Mass spec will tell you all you need to know.
==== well rest assured the MS "results" Meso members requested from YOU, told us nothing, except your FOS===
That pass fail thing is a waste of money.
===== Oh really, have you any idea what the LabMax "pass fail" thing is based on? NOT or your wouldn't make such a misinformed AND obviously biased comment =
Sounds like you are on eroids so you can just PM Angus and he can help you.
===== WHY must "ANGUS" be contacted by PM, more covert BS ===
You post a shitty mass spec on eroids and no one would buy from them.
=====(THIS WAS MY FAVORITE, lol) FIRST not ONE MASS spec has been revealed by YOURSELF PAN MAN, SECOND there is no doubt, a negative MASS SPEC or comment made by a member on Eroids about sponsor lab would be removed promptly. =====
I really think with proof they would try to make you happy.
====By reminding you of the "RULES" and forwarding more BUNK AAS ====
Everyone needs to realize that sources get people trying to scam them as well.
(NOW THIS ONE IS A CLASSIC, and it's unfortunate you actually post garbage like this because it then becomes obvious some mates actually believe this utter nonsense)
====Hmm I know this thought is a novel idea to a shill like yourself, but who and when was the determination made, the CONSUMER must prove malfeasance on behalf of a lab?
Now tool what planet are you from which makes this so difficult to understand? Once a consumer claims the AAS were not GTG, the SOURCE PERFORMS THE ANALYSIS AND POSTS THE RESULTS. After those lab results are posted a few times no mate will even consider "scamming the source". ========
So someone that is proud of their gear might get defensive. It is hard to argue with science though.
===== Oh really Pan Man the MARTIAN! Sources argue over "the science" all the time. Want some examples I've received? Sure why not!
"The AAS tested were NOT ours, the analyzer was not calibrated correctly, the contaminants were not identified, the concentration was not quantified, the technician was illiterate, no PhD (or scientist) signed this assay, no lab address is provided, the chemicals used and the grid speed were not mentioned, the type of MASS SPEC (gas, liquid, ionic) was not mentioned, I have at least twenty more.
Let me ask you something Pan Man are you stupid or do you believe we are, because your sorely mistaken if you believe the latter is the case with most Meso members. We simply don't believe your Eroids talking points BULLSHIT because most of us have been there done that far to many times.
Want one example, sure why not. One of my first requests was for a MASS SPEC to be posted and of course you agreed not realizing we knew better. So you tried the same old diversion, a dude "what's your PM, and I'll fill your box with them".
Yea but sorry fella we don't hide behind PM's on Meso, so post them on the open forum oooooppps ah du ya ba I wanna I've a ba wahs that ya say, shiiiit.!!!
The next rabbit out of the hat trick attempted was posting "MS results" you were fully aware did not contain ANYTHING we requested!
Then in desperation your final plea for understanding was challenging me to test AAS submitted from your lab, to make your job easier, WTF!
You believe I give a damn about or have a vested interest in MESO sources?
NOT ONE of them fella and especially yours! Nope the fact is I absolutely enjoy revealing scammers, elusive shills, steadfast plants, yet most importantly exposing those producers of that absolute junk currently being referred to as "generic GH".
May I suggest you promptly return that gestapo called Eroids where "the rules" dictate member behavior like little puppets and ensure sources reign forever, lol!
[
)]