are eliteanabolx gtg?

[Dr JIM]

I knew something was wrong when I first glanced at your Mass Spec of D-Boll but something just didn't look right! Then I noticed the HEIGHT of the second spike hmm an isotope fragment probably.

Then I noticed the reported MOLECULAR WEIGHT was WRONG for D-bol. Hmm what do we have here I piked! Ah ha the answer lie in the MOLECULAR FORMULA itself! Ya see I dont expect stupid FUCKS LIKE yourself to look at and know how to interpret a Mass Spec. Nope, but I do DUMB ASS!

The molecular weight of D-Bol is 300 and NOT 301 and the molecular formula for D-bol is C20H28O2 it is NOT C20H29O2!!!!! Indeed the difference in the reported molecular weight and that of the AAS you said they tested was ONE! Now where did that come from? That extra HYDROGEN STUPID!!

This is what you did! you changed the name of the substance being tested FROM
ISOPIMARATE to METHANDROSTENOLONE (D-bol)
So you have FUCKED anyone and everyone you have sold the compound to YOU DAMN FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT LIAR

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY but the MEMBERS WILL DO THAT, SCAMMER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Dr JIM]

THE ABOVE STRUCTURE IS DBOL THIS ONE IS ISOPIMARATE. Note the similarities!! Hey scammer get your ass back here ya piece of shit!
Rest assured I will report your scamming ass to every board. Hey Burr you still feel comfortable supporting ANY of Pan Mans posts.

 

[Burrr]

THE ABOVE STRUCTURE IS DBOL THIS ONE IS ISOPIMARATE. Note the similarities!! Hey scammer get your ass back here ya piece of shit!
Rest assured I will report your scamming ass to every board. Hey Burr you still feel comfortable supporting ANY of Pan Mans posts.

I'm not gonna pretend to understand mass spec graphs, but I did ask the guy who did the testing about this, here is his reply.

On page 5 of the compositional analysis you will see where we compared the analyte to a perfect specimen as defined by the molecular structure set forth from a database of know chemicals. You can see by looking at it that the analyte in question (dbol) is, in fact, what it says it is and effective in the human body.

 

[corageon]

I knew something was wrong when I first glanced at your Mass Spec of D-Boll but something just didn't look right! Then I noticed the HEIGHT of the second spike hmm an isotope fragment probably.

Then I noticed the reported MOLECULAR WEIGHT was WRONG for D-bol. Hmm what do we have here I piked! Ah ha the answer lie in the MOLECULAR FORMULA itself! Ya see I dont expect stupid FUCKS LIKE yourself to look at and know how to interpret a Mass Spec. Nope, but I do DUMB ASS!

The molecular weight of D-Bol is 300 and NOT 301 and the molecular formula for D-bol is C20H28O2 it is NOT C20H29O2!!!!! Indeed the difference in the reported molecular weight and that of the AAS you said they tested was ONE! Now where did that come from? That extra HYDROGEN STUPID!!

This is what you did! you changed the name of the substance being tested FROM
ISOPIMARATE to METHANDROSTENOLONE (D-bol)
So you have FUCKED anyone and everyone you have sold the compound to YOU DAMN FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT LIAR

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY but the MEMBERS WILL DO THAT, SCAMMER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Glad you catch this kinda shit

 

[FinaFan]

Glad you catch this kinda shit

The guy did not catch shit. He is so full of shit.

 

[Spyder]

The guy did not catch shit. He is so full of shit.

Lol - bye, bye. Do you really think anyone here is going to believe your bullshit? You have been caught and there is no back peddling now! Maybe your other handle can speak up and defend your lame ass.

 

[FinaFan]

Lol - bye, bye. Do you really think anyone here is going to believe your bullshit? You have been caught and there is no back peddling now! Maybe your other handle can speak up and defend your lame ass.

Do you really think I give a fuck if anyone believes me ? I am just enjoying the dumb ass comment you all are spewing.

 

[FinaFan]

I'm not gonna pretend to understand mass spec graphs, but I did ask the guy who did the testing about this, here is his reply.

On page 5 of the compositional analysis you will see where we compared the analyte to a perfect specimen as defined by the molecular structure set forth from a database of know chemicals. You can see by looking at it that the analyte in question (dbol) is, in fact, what it says it is and effective in the human body.

That DICK RIDERS argument is a smoke screen. 100% full of shit. I am sure he is a rep for another source or more. I have shown him mass specs. He said they where fake. Then they are wrong. He is grasping for straws. He has been bragging about being able to get mass specs so he could always let me send his bitch ass a sample and he can see what his lab says.

 

[Spyder]

Do you really think I give a fuck if anyone believes me ? I am just enjoying the dumb ass comment you all are spewing.

So you admit that you are a liar.

 

[FinaFan]

So you admit that you are a lair.

No I am not a liar. Everything I have said is 100% true. Nice AVI by the way.

 

[FinaFan]

To all you fucks talking shit. All I bring is good info. I am not pushing any product. Most people that pmed me I have told them I was out and they would have to wait. Scammers are never out. As for the mass spec. Mine are on the money. Proof why would I fake a shitty viagra sample? Now why is so many people getting bent out of shape? the only thing I can think of is you are reps for a source or you are just riding the dick of a rep of a source. Maybe if I gave everyone the info on how to get their own mass specs your source would not look so hot. That is my full intention too. I have and always will push for gear testing. I would like to see everyone at least test 1 compound from every order. Also I think blood work should be done several times during before and after a cycle. Mass spec is a amazing tool for AAS users. Everyone needs to embrace it. If everyone that is talking shit is against that they are idiots or they stand to lose money. No matter what they say mass spec is the way to go.
$75 is a small price to pay to know what you are getting yourself into. Now a days you are not special because you can get mass spec. Anyone can now.

 

[sin]

To all you fucks talking shit. All I bring is good info. I am not pushing any product. Most people that pmed me I have told them I was out and they would have to wait. Scammers are never out. As for the mass spec. Mine are on the money. Proof why would I fake a shitty viagra sample? Now why is so many people getting bent out of shape? the only thing I can think of is you are reps for a source or you are just riding the dick of a rep of a source. Maybe if I gave everyone the info on how to get their own mass specs your source would not look so hot. That is my full intention too. I have and always will push for gear testing. I would like to see everyone at least test 1 compound from every order. Also I think blood work should be done several times during before and after a cycle. Mass spec is a amazing tool for AAS users. Everyone needs to embrace it. If everyone that is talking shit is against that they are idiots or they stand to lose money. No matter what they say mass spec is the way to go.
$75 is a small price to pay to know what you are getting yourself into. Now a days you are not special because you can get mass spec. Anyone can now.

If your mass specs are "money" then explain why the "dbol" you ran ms on has a mass of 301.2144 or why the there is an extra hydrogen in the formula? You've not addressed it all. Just simply called it a smoke screen and a flat out lie and you expect people to forget the accusation.It's right there on page 4 for all of meso to read. Your avoidance of the charges say the most. Also, the argument " why would i fake a shitty viagra example" proves nothing. Maybe your a pos who gets off on screwing people over. The burden of proof that you're not a pos isn't on us, it's on you. You are under trial here. You say you bring nothing but good info but all you seem to bring is a seemingly falsified ms analysis and school yard name calling ( calling people douches? really? and you're not 12?) It doesn't matter if you are trying to sell here or not. You have already proved yourself a liar and ignorant. I'm sure no one would buy from you after these threads, but at this point it seems people just want you gone. You're of no use here, a feeling I'm sure you are all too familiar with.

 

[Spyder]

To all you fucks talking shit. All I bring is good info. I am not pushing any product. Most people that pmed me I have told them I was out and they would have to wait. Scammers are never out. As for the mass spec. Mine are on the money. Proof why would I fake a shitty viagra sample? Now why is so many people getting bent out of shape? the only thing I can think of is you are reps for a source or you are just riding the dick of a rep of a source. Maybe if I gave everyone the info on how to get their own mass specs your source would not look so hot. That is my full intention too. I have and always will push for gear testing. I would like to see everyone at least test 1 compound from every order. Also I think blood work should be done several times during before and after a cycle. Mass spec is a amazing tool for AAS users. Everyone needs to embrace it. If everyone that is talking shit is against that they are idiots or they stand to lose money. No matter what they say mass spec is the way to go.
$75 is a small price to pay to know what you are getting yourself into. Now a days you are not special because you can get mass spec. Anyone can now.

Dave - so as a UGL you must go through the same vet process as everyone else. This you actually blew by trying to bypass the system and sorry but the chance is over. To any new members I urge you to please stay away from this guy who is just a scammer. He has nothing but fake mass spec docs that can be found online and can be doctored.

 

[Dr JIM]

You are a FUCKING LIAR Pan Man and an IDIOT at that if you want us or me to believe MS can be "off" by a molar mass of ONE. The notion is absurd and you are a SCAMMING PIECE OF SHIT!

 

[Burrr]

You are a FUCKING LIAR Pan Man and an IDIOT at that if you want us or me to believe MS can be "off" by a molar mass of ONE. The notion is absurd and you are a SCAMMING PIECE OF SHIT!

Jim, do you have any examples of mass spec on gear that is not off by one?
The guy who did the test explained it like this, analyte is always M+1 and any double bonded molecule is 2M+1, where 2 is the multiplier, M is the molecule, and +1 is the carbon molecule that's added.

I looked at a few other mass specs on assorted types of gear, and the mass is off by .8 and they have an extra hydrogen.

I really doubt Angus does fake mass spec's for banned sources.

 

[Dr JIM]

YEP dumb shit, I've now reviewed all of your mass spec submissions and they are all crap! How can I say that so others know I'm NOT setting up some "smoke screen?

OK look at the mass spec "tolerance setting" in the top left hand corner of the computer generated page. They are ALL set at 20PPM! What does that mean?
It provides the accuracy in DETERMINING the MASS of ANY compound being analyzed. (Most MS are set at 5ppm/ for masses < 200gms/mol)

So in this instance the amount of mass which may have been UNACCOUNTED for is 0.00002 GRAMS/ MOL and hydrogen weighs ONE GRAM/MOL..

Your an uneducated prick, who can't tie his shoes or wave bye bye to mommy Pan Man. YOU WILL NOT SELL SHIT ON MESO and that includes ADVICE!

Oh yea please do forward that info on how we can all test our AAS using Mass Spec thru YOUR INDEPENDENT LAB, I'd LOVE to speak with them, shit head!

 

[Dr JIM]

Jim, do you have any examples of mass spec on gear that is not off by one?
The guy who did the test explained it like this, analyte is always M+1 and any double bonded molecule is 2M+1, where 2 is the multiplier, M is the molecule, and +1 is the carbon molecule that's added.

I looked at a few other mass specs on assorted types of gear, and the mass is off by .8 and they have an extra hydrogen.

I really doubt Angus does fake mass spec's for banned sources.

OFF BY ONE! Yea in the 1950s and perhaps even today with some labs that are using antiquated MS.

However this is easily remedied by purchasing MS with LOWER TOLERANCES, and NO MS with a tolerance of 20ppm should be off BY ONE gram/mol when the substance being tested weighs 370 grams/mol.

Do the calculation yourself, the notion is absurd for TODAYS MASS SPECS!!!

Did "ANGUS" provide you with the manufactures MS printed tolerances?

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I knew something was wrong when I first glanced at your Mass Spec of D-Boll but something just didn't look right! Then I noticed the HEIGHT of the second spike hmm an isotope fragment probably.

Then I noticed the reported MOLECULAR WEIGHT was WRONG for D-bol. Hmm what do we have here I piked! Ah ha the answer lie in the MOLECULAR FORMULA itself! Ya see I dont expect stupid FUCKS LIKE yourself to look at and know how to interpret a Mass Spec. Nope, but I do DUMB ASS!

The molecular weight of D-Bol is 300 and NOT 301 and the molecular formula for D-bol is C20H28O2 it is NOT C20H29O2!!!!! Indeed the difference in the reported molecular weight and that of the AAS you said they tested was ONE! Now where did that come from? That extra HYDROGEN STUPID!!

This is what you did! you changed the name of the substance being tested FROM
ISOPIMARATE to METHANDROSTENOLONE (D-bol)
So you have FUCKED anyone and everyone you have sold the compound to YOU DAMN FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT LIAR

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED IMMEDIATELY but the MEMBERS WILL DO THAT, SCAMMER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And with that post, FlimFlam's fate is sealed.

Sayonara, FlimFlam. Come back when you can't stay so long.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6NfWLdpqcU]The Beatles - Hello, Goodbye - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Burrr]

OFF BY ONE! Yea in the 1950s and perhaps even today with some labs that are using antiquated MS.

However this is easily remedied by purchasing MS with LOWER TOLERANCES, and NO MS with a tolerance of 20ppm should be off BY ONE gram/mol when the substance being tested weighs 370 grams/mol.

Do the calculation yourself, the notion is absurd for TODAYS MASS SPECS!!!

Did "ANGUS" provide you with the manufactures MS printed tolerances?

All of the mass spec's posted by that lab are off by .8, Fina didn't change anything. He posted the same graphs as the lab did.
I haven't found any mass spec's on gear that wasn't off by one.

 

[FinaFan]

If your mass specs are "money" then explain why the "dbol" you ran ms on has a mass of 301.2144 or why the there is an extra hydrogen in the formula? You've not addressed it all. Just simply called it a smoke screen and a flat out lie and you expect people to forget the accusation.It's right there on page 4 for all of meso to read. Your avoidance of the charges say the most. Also, the argument " why would i fake a shitty viagra example" proves nothing. Maybe your a pos who gets off on screwing people over. The burden of proof that you're not a pos isn't on us, it's on you. You are under trial here. You say you bring nothing but good info but all you seem to bring is a seemingly falsified ms analysis and school yard name calling ( calling people douches? really? and you're not 12?) It doesn't matter if you are trying to sell here or not. You have already proved yourself a liar and ignorant. I'm sure no one would buy from you after these threads, but at this point it seems people just want you gone. You're of no use here, a feeling I'm sure you are all too familiar with.

For the guys that think the DR guy has any clue what he is talking about. Need to know that the analyte is always m+1 and double bond is 2m+1.Here is why http://www dot chemguide.co.uk/analysis/masspec/mplus1.html It is because the process ionized the chem and it lost 1 lectron so an extra proton filled the slot to make it a net positive charge.