Association between Physiologic Testosterone Levels, Lean Mass, and Fat Mass

Michael Scally MD

Doctor of Medicine
10+ Year Member
Grant Mouser J, Loprinzi PD, Loenneke JP. The Association between Physiologic Testosterone Levels, Lean Mass, and Fat Mass in a Nationally Representative Sample of Men in the United States. Steroids. The Association between Physiologic Testosterone Levels, Lean Mass, and Fat Mass in a Nationally Representative Sample of Men in the United States

Highlights
· We examined an association between normal testosterone levels and body composition.
· Non-hypogonadal men with lowest [T] had less lean mass, more adipose.
· Within the normal range, high [T] is associated with healthy body composition.

Testosterone deficiency leads to increased muscle loss with aging and increased fat mass. Supraphysiologic levels cause an increase in muscle mass and decrease in fat mass. The difference in lean and fat mass across physiologic levels of testosterone has been under examined in men.

Objective - Examine the association between physiologic testosterone levels with lean and fat mass.

Methods - Data from the 1999-2000 NHANES were used (n=252 men; 18-85 yrs). Testosterone and SHBG values were obtained by a morning blood sample. Body composition was measured by DXA. Multivariable linear regression was used to compute unadjusted, minimally adjusted, and extended models of relative upper- and lower-body lean and fat mass.

Results - In the extended model, men with total testosterone levels in the highest 25% (4th quartile) had more lower-body lean mass (LBLM) (β = 22.1(%), 95%CI: 9.0, 35.3, p=0.003) and upper-body lean mass (UBLM) (β = 5.6(%), 95%CI: 0.1, 11.2, p=0.046), and less lower-body fat mass (LBFM) (β = -9.9(%), 95%CI: -17.7, -2.1, p=0.016) and upper-body fat mass (UBFM) (β = -6.1(%), 95%CI: -10.1, -2.1, p=0.005) than those in the 1st quartile.

Men in the 3rd quartile had more LBLM (β = 14.2, 95%CI: 5.3, 23.1, p=0.004), UBLM (β = 5.6, 95%CI: 2.0, 9.2, p=0.004), and less LBFM (β = -9.7(%), 95%CI: -16.7, -2.7, p=0.010) and UBFM (β = -4.7(%), 95%CI: -8.3, -1.2, p=0.012) than those in the 1st quartile.

Conclusion - These findings suggest that, at physiologic levels, an association exists between higher levels of testosterone and favorable lean and fat measures.


 
Isn't this dependent on their diets and lifestyle?

Unless they all ate the exact same thing and exercised the exact same way.
 
I intended to purchase it until I saw that I would be paying Elsevier. Fuck those guys.
 
Back
Top