ATTN: OGs and other well known members. Source talk?

Happy Thanksgiving Brother. Hope you enjoy it.

With QSC here the place could definitely use a little disinfectant.
I agree qsc is a rough source, and is to popular for handing out floaters.

Are you advertising to have shit testing and holding onto who provided the labs? Literally the complete opposite of harm reduction.

Happy Thanksgiving bro, for the record I appreciate your work with the testing standard here.
 
Retabolil was a person.

So yes you googled shit.
1732798567405.webp
This is what i seen which is where my answer came from but honestly I don't even care anymore. Its crazy to argue over something that has zero purpose or meaning. Don't believe me? cool. I googled it and I'm an idiot that doesn't know anything. Literally makes zero difference to me man.
 
Are you advertising to have shit testing and holding onto who provided the labs? Literally the complete opposite of harm reduction.
Let's face it, the old MESO would have run QSC out of here. That WKNs and "OGs" haven't banded together to give this "source" not a moments rest is a complete mystery to me.

Instead you've got the AI appointed orange letters actively promoting the source with their actions. Rather than more humility, the trusted members here need more backbone to uphold the standard. MESO went backwards. No doubt about it letting "Tracy" run around here with no accountability. WITAF?

Take care and hope you have a great day.
 
Are you advertising to have shit testing and holding onto who provided the labs? Literally the complete opposite of harm reduction.
And yes read the above quote in context. Giving brewers a means of anonymous surveillance on the raws manufacturers is a relevant approach to get data and gain insight. This method was used for Project 3. A brewer can stay anonymous and test RAWS without that info coming back to bite them. If you have other ideas and would like to help open invite.
 
With all that knowledge and experience why don't you have this place cleaned up yet? Not even one premium line for members to vote on with their wallets. No surveillance, no insight into raws suppliers.

Let's get to work. You have the practical experience. With no COI you would be a valuable team member if you drop the cool guy, outlaw shtick.
I had to press show ignored content...

Rant.

Clean up? Who am I, Meso Police? Aren't we all adults that need to make their own decisions?

And spare me the "I am here for Harm Reduction". Harm reduction is advising, testing and letting the end user make their own decision. The constant pestering, spamming, self promoting, holier than thou attitude, that you display is sickening.

Look Ma, I know better than all of those fucktards!

Sources need to subdue to my superior principles, or forever be banned and forgotten from this forum, because I serve Harm Reduction, so what I say is THE LAW!

Fuck that. Darwin said survival of the fittest. I say survival of the smartest. If a person wants to gamble with their health, well... crack on!

And ese, I have nothing to drop. I am, who I am. If you think it's a shtick, you are free to continue doing so.

The only thing I know is this: I live rent-free in your head.
 
And yes read the above quote in context. Giving brewers a means of anonymous surveillance on the raws manufacturers is a relevant approach to get data and gain insight. This method was used for Project 3. A brewer can stay anonymous and test RAWS without that info coming back to bite them. If you have other ideas and would like to help open invite.
Nothing needs to be anonymous, end of story
 
The only thing I know is this: I live rent-free in your head.
LoL. Keep telling yourself that. I do feel some empathy for you. Take it easy.

And still waiting for your "dangerous" explanation unless you were just talking shit, which is understandable on forums.

Remember, you are an example of why QSC still operates here. No standards.
 
I'm new to this forum but know a good bit plus have read through a lot of the forum. Its not hard to spot out who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't but you're absolutely right I should be taking more time. I got ahead of myself.
If this is the case why make a public post and not direct message the "OGs"??
Funny thing is, if you weren't around for GL you're not considered OG.
Or even MSG Labs
 
Within the process your referring to. You don't need to look at the broad spectrum, keep it within context of the topic. Maybe, you should think through it.
I am. You won't get surveillance on the raws manufacturers without it. I'll draw a picture later. Come by the thread and we can kick it around. Take it easy and appreciate your engagement.
 
Let's face it, the old MESO would have run QSC out of here. That WKNs and "OGs" haven't banded together to give this "source" not a moments rest is a complete mystery to me.

Instead you've got the AI appointed orange letters actively promoting the source with their actions. Rather than more humility, the trusted members here need more backbone to uphold the standard. MESO went backwards. No doubt about it letting "Tracy" run around here with no accountability. WITAF?

Take care and hope you have a great day.
The OGs tried that and they ended up leaving the board all together. Every day was a shit show about the driada enclomophene fiasco. Shit got nowhere
 
I am. You won't get surveillance on the raws manufacturers without it. I'll draw a picture later. Come by the thread and we can kick it around. Take it easy and appreciate your engagement.
I think deep down you understand my point, I have faith in you. For the sake of not hijacking the thread anymore I'll leave it at that.
 
Let's face it, the old MESO would have run QSC out of here. That WKNs and "OGs" haven't banded together to give this "source" not a moments rest is a complete mystery to me.

Instead you've got the AI appointed orange letters actively promoting the source with their actions. Rather than more humility, the trusted members here need more backbone to uphold the standard. MESO went backwards. No doubt about it letting "Tracy" run around here with no accountability. WITAF?

Take care and hope you have a great day.
All of the ruthless source vetting OGs are banned or have left the board.

The rest don't give a shit to be involved in source drama and doing all the work for the smooth brains waiting to be spoonfed.
It circles back to the core principle, everyone needs to do their own research.

If peoples "research" leads them to believing the tidal wave of qsc shills instead of practical reasoning, that's on them.
 
Back
Top