BG pharmaceutical drugs bgpharmadrugs.com

Amazing stuff, a real "miracle drug", should be in everyone's cabinet and a single dose a year can have an effect out of all proportion on health.
which dose/ dosing protocol would you suggest? I've been meaning to score some ivermectin as well for these reasons.
 
which dose/ dosing protocol would you suggest? I've been meaning to score some ivermectin as well for these reasons.

It's a difficult thing to establish, because the published studies look at protocols that are all over the place. At the end of the day, regular use, at higher total doses correlate with lower disease and mortality.

On the other hand, these protocols are based on prophylactic use in parts of the world where its regular use is accepted due to the threat of parasites.

I found a protocol used in the US to eliminate demodex, a skin parasite that's common in adults,(30% at 20, 100% by age 90) increasing with age. It's typically asymptomatic, but it does cause uneven skin tone, rosacea, even accelerates male pattern balding, primarily through inflammation caused by its waste products and the bacteria present in its body when they die ( it also eats living cells inside pores).

So rather than taking some protocol chosen randomly, I thought I'd kill two birds with one stone, using a protocol deemed safe enough for use by dermatologists, Improving skin condition while benefitting from the lower disease burden associated with use of ivermectin prophetically in parasite heavy parts of the world.

.2mg/kg, once a week for 8 weeks. So 90kg would be 18mg once a week for 8 weeks, once a year, this is squarely in the middle of the range of cumulative doses that show unmistakable benefits in reducing mortality, and likely to improve skin condition at the same time,

One note, after 3-4 weeks it's possible skin tone worsens briefly, some red patches appearing, as a result of the mass die off of demodex, releasing bacteria, causing an inflammatory flareup.
 
It's a difficult thing to establish, because the published studies look at protocols that are all over the place. At the end of the day, regular use, at higher total doses correlate with lower disease and mortality.

On the other hand, these protocols are based on prophylactic use in parts of the world where its regular use is accepted due to the threat of parasites.

I found a protocol used in the US to eliminate demodex, a skin parasite that's common in adults,(30% at 20, 100% by age 90) increasing with age. It's typically asymptomatic, but it does cause uneven skin tone, rosacea, even accelerates male pattern balding, primarily through inflammation caused by its waste products and the bacteria present in its body when they die ( it also eats living cells inside pores).

So rather than taking some protocol chosen randomly, I thought I'd kill two birds with one stone, using a protocol deemed safe enough for use by dermatologists, Improving skin condition while benefitting from the lower disease burden associated with use of ivermectin prophetically in parasite heavy parts of the world.

.2mg/kg, once a week for 8 weeks. So 90kg would be 18mg once a week for 8 weeks, once a year, this is squarely in the middle of the range of cumulative doses that show unmistakable benefits in reducing mortality, and likely to improve skin condition at the same time,

One note, after 3-4 weeks it's possible skin tone worsens briefly, some red patches appearing, as a result of the mass die off of demodex, releasing bacteria, causing an inflammatory flareup.
thank you again for your prompt and extensive answers always. i might try 3mg of some indian generic first to see if i tolerate it well. The anecdotal evidence for the beneficial effects on health is stacking up as well since these past 5 years when it comes to adverse effects of the "you know what" and among (recovering) cancer patients as well.

Why would this be? Something inherent to the compound itself or do we carry more parasites than we think/know of?
 
thank you again for your prompt and extensive answers always. i might try 3mg of some indian generic first to see if i tolerate it well. The anecdotal evidence for the beneficial effects on health is stacking up as well since these past 5 years when it comes to adverse effects of the "you know what" and among (recovering) cancer patients as well.

Why would this be? Something inherent to the compound itself or do we carry more parasites than we think/know of?

There are many theories scientists have put forward for what they indisputably observe. Some are extraordinarily complex, but the one I find most compelling is the simplest,

By relieving the burden of a myriad of parasites (near universal, undiagnosed) immune system capacity is freed to more effectively deal with diseases of all types, including the "clean up work" that reduces the prevalence of cancer.

The excellent safety profile, something akin to taking low dose aspirin, makes it a "no brainer" to me.
 
There are many theories scientists have put forward for what they indisputably observe. Some are extraordinarily complex, but the one I find most compelling is the simplest,

By relieving the burden of a myriad of parasites (near universal, undiagnosed) immune system capacity is freed to more effectively deal with diseases of all types, including the "clean up work" that reduces the prevalence of cancer.

The excellent safety profile, something akin to taking low dose aspirin, makes it a "no brainer" to me.
thanks. speaking about the brain, as well as the gut of course, one of my assumptions is it might have a positive effect on wellbeing or even behaviour. What are your thoughts on that?
 
thanks. speaking about the brain, as well as the gut of course, one of my assumptions is it might have a positive effect on wellbeing or even behaviour. What are your thoughts on that?

As we've seen as the GLP miracle is spreading more widely, reduced inflammation is as close to the "fountain of youth" as humanity had come thus far,

In the brain, are neuronal level, where GLP receptor activation sets off a chain reaction that ends in lowered inflammation, we're already seeing the signs of significantly improved mental health show up in clinical data. Alzheimer's experts see these drugs as reducing neurodegeneration in a significant way.

By killing off parasites, we reduce the amount of endotoxin in our system. Endotoxin is detected by the vagus nerve, which signals the brain to increase systemic inflammation. So in this indirect way, by reducing endotoxin, systemic inflammation is lowered, and to one degree or another, this likely leads to a better sense of overall wellbeing.

It's worth pointing out here that the reason ivermectin, a unique compound discovered in the soil of a region in Japan, is so effective at being deadly to parasites and harmless to us, is that it targets the central nervous systems of parasites. but is completely incapable of penetrating the blood brain barrier in humans.

"But then why isn't it advised everyone use this?"

Something I found myself asking.

There is no more effective anti-parasitic drug in existence. The fear is overuse will lead to a parasite immune to its effects developing. There is no evidence of that occurring yet*. But, like, antibiotics, limiting its use as a matter of policy is considered desirable for "herd" health, even if that's at the expense of the individual.

*areas of widespread ivermectin use have had ivermectin resistant parasites develop, but none that impact humans.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top