Can LE be a source?

Isn't that something like entrapment? Or something like that.

C'mon bro sources usually have people coming to them not the other way around.

Entrapment if " u were unlikely to commit said offense otherwise".

What r u gonna says, "hey bro I was just fucking with ya when I made that purchase from u!"
 
[QUOTE="atxwarpig, post: 1240750, member: 69716" ]Isn't that something like entrapment? Or something like that.[/QUOTE]

Think of it this way you've seen women cops pose as hookers on cops to catch dudes looking to get laid so I would think they could. At the end of the day cops can do whatever the fuck they want, you pretty much guilty until proven innocent when it comes to cops.

Back in the day when I drove my 5.0 with a supercharger I had a cop in a camaro cop car egging me on to race him. That asshole kept trying to get me to race for 15mins even said he wouldn't give me a ticket from out his car window as he kept revving off beside me. Don't trust those motherfuckers for shit. Technically that is entrapment but I bet your ass if I would have went for it I would have a fat ticket from that pig or worst my car taken from street racing.

So yes they could like I said before they could but most likely won't. The internet across states so it's federal and the DEA don't care about catching the little man they need to catch bigger fish and lie like they are really big fish to continue collecting our tax money. You are more likely to have a non fed source at your local gym imo they bust a couple of meat heads make themselves look good in the local paper so they continue to do what their real job is giving tickets to people. They need to keep the front that they are there for the peoples protection after all.
 
Last edited:
what stands out for me. In ORD the source DUDE2003 ( or some 2000 number ) got raided and gave up his email and username. The feds used that name to order from i think it was 4 or 5 source that were part of ORD
 
shit take a look at this

http://www.steroidology.com/forum/members/dude2003.html

he was on yesterday
 
I got to thinking about this last night... Can LE set themselves up as a source and solicit people to buy from them and then bust buyers when we send payment ?

Or is that entrapment? Or does it matter?

Hell yes they can and are collectively referred to as a sting but LE must also follow certain legal parameters or the defense may claim their client was entrapped!

In general entrapment REQUIRES:
LE induces the commission of a crime
Except for the inducement by LE the defendant lacks a predisposition towards said criminal activity.

Understand mere solicitation is NOT the equivalent of inducement.

When I was younger I was induced to purchase some MJ on behalf of a "good friend" whom was busted roughly one year earlier and pleaded a deal to become a "narc" for a more lenient sentence.

I had never sold MJ before BUT knew a few that did. However I had to go to this gents house a acquire the product which I then "sold" to this FRIEND. I made all this clear when selling it also. (turns out that was my saving grace bc their evidence was "a recording".

See narced on several of us in this cadre, in other words she induced me (bc of our friendship) to do something I would have never done (no predisposition). Consequently ALL the cases were dismissed bc of entrapment!!

TRUE STORY GENTS
 
See narced on several of us in this cadre, in other words she induced me (bc of our friendship) to do something I would have never done (no predisposition).

Interesting that you were induced by a female. A metaphor for the fall of man, perhaps. Induce and seduce, both verbs with similar yet different meanings. Induction by seduction or the seduction of induction, that is the question.
 
The rule of intrapment no longer exists. Cops Le are allowed to lie and manipulate as they please. Basically they do what they want when they want. Even if you took them to court the DA. Or judge will always rule in there favor.
 
Hell yes they can and are collectively referred to as a sting but LE must also follow certain legal parameters or the defense may claim their client was entrapped!

In general entrapment REQUIRES:
LE induces the commission of a crime
Except for the inducement by LE the defendant lacks a predisposition towards said criminal activity.

Understand mere solicitation is NOT the equivalent of inducement.

When I was younger I was induced to purchase some MJ on behalf of a "good friend" whom was busted roughly one year earlier and pleaded a deal to become a "narc" for a more lenient sentence.

I had never sold MJ before BUT knew a few that did. However I had to go to this gents house a acquire the product which I then "sold" to this FRIEND. I made all this clear when selling it also. (turns out that was my saving grace bc their evidence was "a recording".

See narced on several of us in this cadre, in other words she induced me (bc of our friendship) to do something I would have never done (no predisposition). Consequently ALL the cases were dismissed bc of entrapment!!

TRUE STORY GENTS


Because u were UNLIKELY to have done it otherwise, yes, entrapment.
 
The rule of intrapment no longer exists. Cops Le are allowed to lie and manipulate as they please. Basically they do what they want when they want. Even if you took them to court the DA. Or judge will always rule in there favor.

This is a SOLID statement, do not overlook their ability to manipulate the story, using their "MAGIC PEN", not all happy endings r written them. The relationship between the officer, DA, and the court are innertwinded. B mindful to remember that. Good post bro.
 
absolutely not. Le is too stupid to source they would not know the first thing about brewing unless it was donuts
 
absolutely not. Le is too stupid to source they would not know the first thing about brewing unless it was donuts


The funds r available, they can easily purchase themselves and relabel or just flip the source. I wouldn't put anyhing past them. For those that shop around and taste a bit from here or there, u better think about overexposing urself.
 
The funds r available, they can easily purchase themselves and relabel or just flip the source. I wouldn't put anyhing past them. For those that shop around and taste a bit from here or there, u better think about overexposing urself.
wouldn't this be entrapment. taking orders for gear and then busting someone that you sold to. I don't see it very hard to infiltrate already established sources so I really see no reason for law enforcement to open up their own shop
 
LE couldn't do any worse than some of the sources we've seen peddeling their snake water's
 
but this goes back to something I said long ago. It is always better to buy from a source if you know who is behind the source :-)
 
LE couldn't do any worse than some of the sources we've seen peddeling their snake water's
they wouldn't do worse they would do better because they would want to bust you with the best quality gear. So my advice is to buy from them in the beginning and then move and then buy again and then move and then.. :confused:
 
^^^^ Good point, & once the word gets out on quality... we all know what happens with a mediocre source
 
they wouldn't do worse they would do better because they would want to bust you with the best quality gear. So my advice is to buy from them in the beginning and then move and then buy again and then move and then.. :confused:

Just to clarify, they could sell u crisco in vials and labeled aas, u will still b prosecuted, makes no difference what is in vial.
 
Just to clarify, they could sell u crisco in vials and labeled aas, u will still b prosecuted, makes no difference what is in vial.
unless you had a real good Jewish lawyer..:-).. I know many good Jewish lawyers real Jewish laywers
 
Back
Top