I understand your position better now. I'm not here to defend janoshik I just understood there to be a relative confidence in his skillset, so when you keep saying that you're sure he can be paid off for falsified reports you know that you should expect people to ask more about that.
I have never heard anything good about BT but of course I would not expect CJM to rate them with flying colours lol. If your suggestion is that a BT GH sample tested great with janoshik but was proven bunk with another tester then I suppose that is a relevant anecdote but far from proof obviously, as you noted BT could just send a vial of Serostim for example.
i don't know where the pinned scammer thread is but it seems like people are valuing his services on this subforum. I don't think there is a problem with advertising a for profit harm reduction service. All labs are also trying to make money, that doesn't mean that they can't send out good products and offer good service to do it. So if janoshik is able to help reduce harm but make a living, what's wrong with that, right?
I got long winded here, main thing is I found your accusation a bit concerning so i'm glad that's cleared up.