Congrats Millard.!

[FuriousWO]

Honestly a little skeptical of the results myself. It's very worthy to point out very loudly to the newer folks that this done not mean some lab is "gtg", just that batch was good.

 

[mercury]

Everybody has wondered for long time about this, it would be cool to solve the mystery and have it tested.

NAPS always claimed that this batch of tren was super charged and g2g

 

[Millard]

This is what I saw on this page

Pharmacom Labs PHARMA Test E300 is presented in a 10ml vial and contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

And everything is 100%

First of all even pharmaceutical grade is off by a few %, and it would mean also that they have access to 100% pure powders in China, which makes me to laugh.

There is also deviation error when tested either on GC or HPLC, it is impossible to measure with 100% accuracy .

^^ I recommend reading it again.

 

[Millard]

@Millard Baker, this is awesome. I will donate money to your cause. Very nicely done.

What's the process to submit a sample?

The program is not currently accepting individual sample submissions. It is focusing on obtaining samples covertly and anonymously from authorized resellers and manufacturers. As the program expands, it will look at strategies that capture an even more representative of what is available in various marketplaces around the world.

 

[pmac928]

Thank you millard. We are leading the way in testing that's for sure, but over time will this make a difference in the world of ug aas? So many other boards are so fast to covering up selective scamming to fill their own pockets will this change that in the long run? I would like to think so. Either way thank you for all you do sir!

 

[mercury]

^^ I recommend reading it again.

a little confusing they way it was posted

 

[Millard]

a little confusing they way it was posted

Maybe I should reword something along the lines of:

[PRODUCT] is presented in a 10ml vial and reportedly contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

 

[Millard]

Thank you millard. We are leading the way in testing that's for sure, but over time will this make a difference in the world of ug aas? So many other boards are so fast to covering up selective scamming to fill their own pockets will this change that in the long run? I would like to think so. Either way thank you for all you do sir!

I think it can make a difference. Unfortunately, while product quality and safety is a major problem, there are so many other risks associated with the greed, dishonesty and deceit of many dealers. Various forms of scamming will continue to exist even if ALL products are high quality.

 

[heady muscle]

Subbed

 

[flenser]

I think Hg sees the demise of Labmax is on the horizon and the gravy train is coming to an end. When he sees the samples were slightly over label claims, he'll say the powder's purity must have been greater than 100%!

Merc's comments not withstanding, I don't see how these independent tests are bad for labmax. That is, unless everything tested comes out as well as the first batch of test e and personal testing becomes obsolete.

Everyone sure seems to have a hard-on to discredit reagent tests, though. I don't know why, when I consider EVERY LM test I have done that was later tested with MS or HPLC has been proven correct.

Well, unless you believe Astro when he said the LM test that showed his primo was bunk was later disproved by his China lab that said it was 95+% pure. Unfortunately, LM has been under heavy attack for so long that a lot of people DID take Astro's word and buy his bunk primo.

 

[mercury]

Merc's comments not withstanding, I don't see how these independent tests are bad for labmax. That is, unless everything tested comes out as well as the first batch of test e and personal testing becomes obsolete.

Everyone sure seems to have a hard-on to discredit reagent tests, though. I don't know why, when I consider EVERY LM test I have done that was later tested with MS or HPLC has been proven correct.

Well, unless you believe Astro when he said the LM test that showed his primo was bunk was later disproved by his China lab that said it was 95+% pure. Unfortunately, LM has been under heavy attack for so long that a lot of people DID take Astro's word and buy his bunk primo.

I found about LM when I came to this board, people were already testing. LM is very well documented they have tons of material posted how it works.

All the attempts to discredited come from retards who never used it and do not understand how it works. Also from sources who sell bunk. And they just repeat and spread misinformation instead of helping others.

LM has been a great tool for me to screen all the shit but there are still retards who prefer to test on their own liver.

I also use it to prescreen before sending to lab so I do not pay if there is nothing inside.

 

[rpbb]

labmax is another tool in the arsenal

 

[MindlessWork]

labmax is another tool in the arsenal

Hasn't it been somewhat discredited? It's not a catch-all comprehensive test like the ones Millard has been mentioning.

 

[rpbb]

Hasn't it been somewhat discredited? It's not a catch-all comprehensive test like the ones Millard has been mentioning.

definitely not as good as millards testing, and their were too many people trying to figure out dosages and such which I feel was inappropriate. but it's a quick and cheap test that seems to have been proven right more than wrong.

 

[MindlessWork]

definitely not as good as millards testing, and their were too many people trying to figure out dosages and such which I feel was inappropriate. but it's a quick and cheap test that seems to have been proven right more than wrong.

Agree, just a quick and dirty test and anything that seems out of the ordinary could be sent for further testing if needed.

 

[rpbb]

definitely not as good as millards testing, and their were too many people trying to figure out dosages and such which I feel was inappropriate. but it's a quick and cheap test that seems to have been proven right more than wrong.

and I guess a good experiment would be to go back and look at the mass spec results and compare them to the previous labmax results

 

[Docd187123]

Merc's comments not withstanding, I don't see how these independent tests are bad for labmax. That is, unless everything tested comes out as well as the first batch of test e and personal testing becomes obsolete.

Everyone sure seems to have a hard-on to discredit reagent tests, though. I don't know why, when I consider EVERY LM test I have done that was later tested with MS or HPLC has been proven correct.

Well, unless you believe Astro when he said the LM test that showed his primo was bunk was later disproved by his China lab that said it was 95+% pure. Unfortunately, LM has been under heavy attack for so long that a lot of people DID take Astro's word and buy his bunk primo.

The reason labmax became Louie so quick was bc nobody else was doing testing besides bloods. Some were doing mass specs etc but few and far in between. Now with Millard's new program it will be much much more common which will lead to not as many people labmaxing their stuff.

I never attempted to discredit reagent testing, but I have seen very little in terms of evidence or science from labmax specifically. What little regard I did have for them dissappeared when we had a labmax shill on my other board attempt to beef up their resume.

How many times was a product that you tested with labmax then tested further by other means? Was it the same exact sample you had used for labmax or was it the same batch/source/etc?

 

[manafest]

I'm quite happy that with ability to have random ugl's tested with 100% accurate results all the cock fighting and people stubborn opinions that never held water will slowly vanish and this board will be more of open discussion rather then a clik group that hates and bashes at any given moment....

 

[MindlessWork]

I'm quite happy that with ability to have random ugl's tested with 100% accurate results all the cock fighting and people stubborn opinions that never held water will slowly vanish and this board will be more of open discussion rather then a clik group that hates and bashes at any given moment....

Yes and also to keep the UGLs on their toes and then if there's a problem it could well be the raws for example.

 

[Docd187123]

There are also retards who never miss a chance to plug an infomercial in for labmax. These retards do nobody a favor and just watch their paycheck grow every time the word labmax is mentioned.