DIM and Chrysin...

stat1951

New Member
Lots of controversy going on about the effectiveness - scientific effectiveness - of DIM as a reducer of E2... and also specifically that IndolPlex is the ONLY brand carrying the patented "bioavailable" DIM as patented by Dr. Zeligs.

I believe that at one point - very early on - BioResponse was marketing only through IndolPlex brand name but that they now market the same identical "bioavailable" DIM through numerous other brand names (like Nature Way's "DIM-Plus" as one example).

Your input would be greatly appreciated.

One sees periodic stories of these apparent "miracle cures" by DIM (and usually the story is that it has to be strictly the IndolPlex DIM version).

Likewise with Chrysin.

Have read that there are now various bioavailable products of chrysin on the market (containing bioprene or something like that) to "enhance absorption") or that using it in a transdermal topical format will create the desired results.

What's the deal?

Thanks.

Larry
 
Anyone???

Anyone have any ratyionale on either of these two substances. Links to studies or legitimate trials (not simply booklets published by a patent-holder of one of the brand names), that type of thing?
 
Back
Top