Dnp

Thanks... a lot...

And you feel it does not correlate to dosage or cycle length?
I've read every paper there is on this topic (apart from a recent case study that's in japanese) and I'm certain that it is not correlated to dose or cycle length. Case reports of PN after 10 days of DNP, 300mg doses, etc.

I want to make it very clear that this isn't something you can take preemptive action against, which I'm assuming is where your line of questioning is headed. It comes down to individual sensitivity. But I do commend you for trying to understand the real risks and not falling for hyperbole, as you stated so succinctly in previous post :)
 
I want to make it very clear that this isn't something you can take preemptive action against, which I'm assuming is where your line of questioning is headed. It comes down to individual sensitivity.

I have been reading about DNP on and off for a year or longer and have been quite intrigued by it. Not just the compound itself, but about all the mystique around it as well. I finally found a reliable US source who is still active and, after a long chat with him, ordered some. I then started reading again, and on Reddit saw a report on PN.

Up until now I felt I could control the risks, like allergy, overdosing, poor measurement by whoever capped it and the like by choosing my source carefully and starting very slow (like 100mg per day). I planned it for the winter and stocked up on Powerade and such.

But PN is very significant and possibly permanent side effect. If it has an incidence of as much as 15% and strikes randomly, that changes everything. I gotta rethink this and learn more. For now, I'm out a good bit of cash but that's better than getting PN.
 
I have been reading about DNP on and off for a year or longer and have been quite intrigued by it. Not just the compound itself, but about all the mystique around it as well. I finally found a reliable US source who is still active and, after a long chat with him, ordered some. I then started reading again, and on Reddit saw a report on PN.

Up until now I felt I could control the risks, like allergy, overdosing, poor measurement by whoever capped it and the like by choosing my source carefully and starting very slow (like 100mg per day). I planned it for the winter and stocked up on Powerade and such.

But PN is very significant and possibly permanent side effect. If it has an incidence of as much as 15% and strikes randomly, that changes everything. I gotta rethink this and learn more. For now, I'm out a good bit of cash but that's better than getting PN.
PN is not permanent.

Beyond that, you should of course reassess the benefit/risk ratio if this information is new to you. That is kind of how this process should be. Educate the user, accurately, about the risks & benefits and then let them decide for themselves whether it is worth it or not.
 
you can get for fertilizer okay to consume?

The desperation of those whom are “overweight” never ceases to SHOCK HCPs!!!

What’s even more “shocking”,
by the time “DNP” is tried, it should be obvious quick fix remedies such as DNP, don’t exist and in fact often worsen the problem.
 
The desperation of those whom are “overweight” never ceases to SHOCK HCPs!!!

What’s even more “shocking”,
by the time “DNP” is tried, it should be obvious quick fix remedies such as DNP, don’t exist and in fact often worsen the problem.
Or you know, people are having a hard time finding a good source
 
Back
Top