Frosty said:
Treat a punk little fuck that uses AAS is a waste? Which is more of a waste...some person that lays around all day eating junk food and has huge health problems because of it that cost a ton of money....or....someone using AAS to build muscle? Should we stop treating those fat lazy guys?
Treating these people is a duty of the medical profession, both the little punk and the fat fucker... is it a waste of resources.... yes it is.
Frosty said:
The insurance companies and all that shit set things up...they have no room to get upset when someone uses their system. That's like when people get mad at businesses for finding tax loopholes - don't get mad at them since they're just playing by the rules that the government created.
What are you talking about? You go to jail for tax EVASION and you go to jail for FRUAD. I think you are missing the point here.
Frosty said:
You keep putting people down because they don't have a degree. You fail to realize that many of these doctors lack common sense and have not read their own literature. You don't need a degree for that.
How am I putting "them" down, please don't put words in my mouth. No I do NOT fail to realize this fact. It is YOU who are stereotyping doctors, not I the inverse.
Frosty, the bottom line is that most doc's know more than the lay person about this area, I'm sure you are smart enough to understand that?
Frosty said:
It may correlate, but it does not equal, which is my point.
Yes that is what I said Frosty. Unfortunately you are the one saying that:
"I would have to say for the most part, they think they're king shits and they know everything and give advice on shit they have no clue on."
This implies that "most" doctors are idiots in your mind, is that correct?
Frosty said:
And I don't know how you can say these doctors saying AAS with blow up your liver and kill you know more than most of us...that's just silly.
LMFAO, no it is correct, repeated use of AAS will damage your liver, and kidney's and HTPA and heart and many other things. I know you don't wanna believe it but it is true my friend. As an old gear head my friends, associates and trainee's can vouch for it.
Frosty said:
I sure as hell can stereotype when there are numbers that back me up..
Here is my advice to you, go read the JAMA article and you will get a different story than the one told to you on these marginal websites.
The health system itself certainly has its problems, but NO you cannot stereotype like that. Becuase if you follow your logic then I'd hate to see what you'd have to say about African American's based on conviction rates....
Perhaps take a look at this for a minute. Are AAS drugs? According to your article 106,000 deaths occur due to NON-ERROR drug administration.... hmmmm.
Frosty said:
Depends on what you consider "abuse" and "safe". It would be nice to see some evidence...and I mean the effects of using too much testosterone, not taking handfulls of orals.
Ha, are orals AAS, do people abuse them? Are there negative effects? Do people get abcesses from injections? Do people loose hair? get cysticacne? damage kidneys, mess with brain chemistry get depressed have anxiety, panic attacks....suicide!
READ THE POSTS ON THIS SITE FOR PROOF...JESUS how many bro's are complaining of some very serious side effects... open your eyes!
If you want more proof do a search of some of my old posts on this new site or the old board.
If you still don't believe me I have LOTS of info for you, including personnal experiences my friend!
Frosty said:
They don't have permanent long lasting benefits? How about increase in muscle fibers? Increase in ARs and muscle tissue? When you're 80 you'll be glad for that extra muscle from that dangerous AAS. And what do you define as "healthy"?
You do not know what you are talking about. Androgen receptor up regulation and muscle fiber increases are NOT truly permanent.
Please don't make me school you.... here is an older post of mine on the semi permanancy of muscle gains that will NOT last into your 80's:
"There is certainly debate over the empirical advantages of Palumbos notorious set-point cycle philosophy. I too was initially skeptical of the science behind it. However upon reflection I realized an important aspect about bodybuilding. I looked around at all the guys I had ever trained with and realized that if they had, at least once during their lives, been well past their genetic maximums, that they carried undeniably more retained mass than those who had never been that far past their maximums. Moreover they were much more easily able to return to a very high percentage of that previous LBM level. The same could not be said of those individuals who had only pushed marginally past their maximums. Basically anecdotal evidence strongly suggests that there exist systemic alterations that occur when a subject greatly exceeds his genetic maximum that allow the individual to 1) retain a greater percentage of LBM post cycle and 2) acquire a greater ability to put that mass on again subsequently. What are these systemic alterations this is where the science comes in. There is strong evidence that, systemically, androgen receptors are capable of up-regulation. [Kemppainen et al. (J Biol Chem 267 968), Endocrinology (1990) 126 1165, J Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (1990) 37 553, J Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (1993) 45 333, Endocrinol Japan (1992) 39 235., Endocrinology (1996) 137 1385.] Now, I think that we can all agree that there does exist some biochemical mechanism of up-regulation which correlates highly with androgen levels. What remains to be proven is that this up-regulation imparts some effect beyond acutely increased mRNA translation, translation efficiency, or reduction in AR turnover. If the effects of sustained high androgen levels imparts acute AR increases, does a longer period of sustained androgens impart some semi-permanent effect to these processes which may translate into support of the set-point philosophy? I submit that there is extremely strong anecdotal evidence that this does occur. Moreover there IS a viable scientific theory to explain, at least in some measure, this process through AR up-regulation. "
Frosty said:
The fact is, doctors as a whole, along with the medical community, DON'T KNOW JACK SHIT ABOUT HEALTH.
Oh brother...... Swale you there?