Domestic Raws

Stretch

Subscriber
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.
 
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.

I agree and I have brought this up several times lately. It's great to be uncensored but it comes with great responsibility from the members. People seem to be having a hard time understanding what is ok to post and what isn't.
 
ill agree to not discussing it in public, telling new members not to, that will probably depend on my mood, but dont count to much on me doing so.
 
^^^ second that. These questions/ threads bring unwanted, unneeded attention. I agree with keeping this off the open forum.
 
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.[/QUOTE]
is it known? really? or are we just assuming.i rarely hear bout busts on raws.
 
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.[/QUOTE]
is it known? really? or are we just assuming.i rarely hear bout busts on raws.

Its obviously not something I can provide proof of. Unless there is a poll of officers, describing their agenda.

But if you have any experience with LE, or even just know of how they operate, you know that LE works UP the food chain not down.

If you have any experience with black market drug trade, or even just knowledge of how they operate, then you know that raw sources are, almost universally, higher up the food chain.
 
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.

I second this.

It literally took me years before people would trust me with that kind of information, I do get a little bit irked by guys with single digit postcounts asking for answers on the open board. This is stuff that should be discussed in PM, IMHO.

The flip side of it is where I live I feel that our UG prices are outrageous, and it would benefit the community as a whole if people could do more for themselves. When a guy tells me he paid $150 for a 10ml of sustanon it makes me a little bit disgusted.

I guess having an uncensored board is a double edged sword. But as long as the vets don' tell stories out of School, nothing worthwhile will be here to see.
 
Last edited:
I don't know about you guys, but I hate all the domestic raw questions here lately.

Does anyone here like it??

Would anyone be opposed to having a member created policy of politely telling new members that we don't do that type of discussion here? LE cares more about powders (ie..production) than distribution, this is known.[/QUOTE]
is it known? really? or are we just assuming.i rarely hear bout busts on raws.

If I remember correctly raws discussion was a no-no when you owned IL?
 
If I remember correctly raws discussion was a no-no when you owned IL?

yes...thats correct. i even came up with the rule.

that still doesn`t address my question.... do LE really care more about powders than distribution, Stretch says "this is known". is it really known? or do assume it.
should we talk about it....prob NOT....do LE care MORE about powders then ready made oil.....prob not
 
Its obviously not something I can provide proof of. Unless there is a poll of officers, describing their agenda.

But if you have any experience with LE, or even just know of how they operate, you know that LE works UP the food chain not down.

If you have any experience with black market drug trade, or even just knowledge of how they operate, then you know that raw sources are, almost universally, higher up the food chain.
lol...true.
 
every time i have been busted when i was a kid gettin in truble they never asked who my clients were they all ways wanted to know a chef.but that is just my exp.[}:)]
 
I disagree. If wr stop powder discussion it puts power back into sources and board owners. I do my best to order powders so that i am not at the mercy of the bathtub sources on the boards. I have argued with some very popular sources on recipes, eo, filtration, and process. When i make my own (i dont source ever) i have peace of mind and cost savings.

Also lastly, didnt the busts work themselves down and not up during the last big busts. I believe that ga and leo were cooperating and busting lower level distributors.

Anyway, my .02.
 
yes...thats correct. i even came up with the rule.

that still doesn`t address my question.... do LE really care more about powders than distribution, Stretch says "this is known". is it really known? or do assume it.
should we talk about it....prob NOT....do LE care MORE about powders then ready made oil.....prob not

What was the reasoning behind banning discussion of raws? Most boards claim that its for security purposes.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top