Thats if we actually sent a wrong item. I have a good eye for this. For this man's issue, I stickered a 5 when I should of stickered a 2 on his package. He used that and obviously saw that 5 means Test Base. Everyone knows the texture of Test E. The picture he sent in was obviously, with zero doubt, Test E. But, I would naturally claim its Test base too seeing the mistake at hand. As an offer, I did offer store credit before the price change.
Its really not my problem, when first: The package is indeed Test E. This is verified by me and a fellow source here with an eye.
2nd, why wouldnt he take my offer to get it to testing, and i'll pay the 90$ that jano, or whomever here, charges?
3rd, I offered credit. Why is it my problem the person in question decided not to cash it out before the price hike?
Yall jump on the bandwagon of this story too fast without knowing the full story. Again, I stand by my offer. I credited him the cost of what he paid for it at a time that it was lower. I went out of my way, to credit a order, that I knew was test e, but because of my retarded ass seeing a 5 as a 2, was doubted.
if you want a refund, instead of the store credit, I'm glad to give that. But I'm not going double out of my way to now pay a higher priced item for someone who probably knows he's taking advantage of my mistake.