AnabolicLab.com
New Member
The Dragon Pharma Sustanon 350 lab report has been retracted pending further investigation into likely mistake by SIMEC.
View media item 1938
View media item 1938
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Dragon Pharma Sustanon 350 - HPLC/TAMC/TYMC - 2019-03 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com
- Thread starter AnabolicLab.com
- Start date
jaymaximus
Pro
Damn. Not even underdosed, just undosed
Wow! So thankful for testing to expose crap like this.
mp46
New Member
Holy shit. That’s a straight up scam. Dosing off is one thing but completely missing 3/4 compounds
Damn...
They were doing a bunch of free samples of their test and this is the main one people picked.
I can't even believe this. This company has had great result after great result. However, it was something they had tested.
This test was done completely blind, wasn't it?
Makes me not believe anything EXCEPT blind test results. Any company who sends their own gear in to be tested shouldn't be trusted.
I only look at blind results anyways.
More companies are starting to test their gear though Jano, Lab4Tox, W&M and we're so busy worrying about whose doing the testing were not paying attention to WHOSE sending the sample.
Only closed vials should be accepted by any testing source.
Now I also believe that only pressed orals or capped orals with the package completely shut should be tested.
I believe I'm going to start this discussion in the testing section to see what everyone's thoughts are currently on improving testing and somewhere to post any other pertinent information on testing.
They were doing a bunch of free samples of their test and this is the main one people picked.
I can't even believe this. This company has had great result after great result. However, it was something they had tested.
This test was done completely blind, wasn't it?
Makes me not believe anything EXCEPT blind test results. Any company who sends their own gear in to be tested shouldn't be trusted.
I only look at blind results anyways.
More companies are starting to test their gear though Jano, Lab4Tox, W&M and we're so busy worrying about whose doing the testing were not paying attention to WHOSE sending the sample.
Only closed vials should be accepted by any testing source.
Now I also believe that only pressed orals or capped orals with the package completely shut should be tested.
I believe I'm going to start this discussion in the testing section to see what everyone's thoughts are currently on improving testing and somewhere to post any other pertinent information on testing.
mp46
New Member
I forget if the samples are sent blind or in the packaging but it’s through Simec, a no shit accredited lab in a country where AAS is legal, even if the sample is sent in the original vial a lab like that isn’t ruining its reputation over an AAS sample.
I want questioning the lab at all though...
Blinded test results does not mean what I think you think it means.
None of the AnabolicLab analyses are blinded. SIMEC knows exactly what they are analyzing.
But what is most important is that manufacturers, vendors and sources do not submit samples. They are not informed when their products are tested or which products are tested. And all samples are obtained by secret shoppers without the sources' knowledge.
Holy shit just pure oil 
Good to know and thanks for sharing this one Millard. Bet too many people fell for this scammer who peddled that garbage.
Good to know and thanks for sharing this one Millard. Bet too many people fell for this scammer who peddled that garbage.
bob357sig
Well-known Member
Makes you kind of question any lab or source. Wonder how many guys are running this crap right now. If I were running this I would be totally fucking pissed off, hell- I’m pissed off for the guys running this shit
I am going to retract this lab report now pending further investigation. This is why.
I think SIMEC made a mistake. Dragon Pharma Sustanon 350 advertises three testosterone esters:
testosterone enanthate
testosterone cypionate
testosterone propionate
SIMEC tested the product for the following four testosterones:
testosterone propionate
testosterone isocaproate
testosterone decanoate
testosterone phenylpropionate
SIMEC tested for the wrong esters.
SIMEC didn't find isocaproate, decanoate, phenylpropionate because Dragon Pharma did not include them in the formulation.
SIMEC didn't find enanthate or cypionate because they apparently did not look for those esters.
I think SIMEC made a mistake. Dragon Pharma Sustanon 350 advertises three testosterone esters:
testosterone enanthate
testosterone cypionate
testosterone propionate
SIMEC tested the product for the following four testosterones:
testosterone propionate
testosterone isocaproate
testosterone decanoate
testosterone phenylpropionate
SIMEC tested for the wrong esters.
SIMEC didn't find isocaproate, decanoate, phenylpropionate because Dragon Pharma did not include them in the formulation.
SIMEC didn't find enanthate or cypionate because they apparently did not look for those esters.
Good catch and hopefully the next report will be all correct.
jaymaximus
Pro
Really? Well damn, I guess if they tested 3 years ago it should still be good to go.
LeoTC
Member
An odd formula for Sust, makes me wanna give them another look though.
I'm liking the sound of it.
Yes some labs make their own variations of Sust I am sure.
I was going to double check the esters after I got off work. Great catch Dr.
Yes, I meant blind to the supplier; not AnabolicLab or whoever is doing the testing.
LeoTC
Member
I've looked at it in the past and just moved on assuming it to be a higher dosed version of S250.
On the other hand, if I ordered Sust and received that I might be pissed off because it's not Sust.
Either way, I think they do a disservice labeling that blend as such.
stone988
Well-known Member
Hmm anyone consider this is a counterfeit?
MisterSuperGod
Well-known Member
Millard seems to have figured it out in post #11.
Similar threads
