Hey einstein, I've read a lot of your posts and your pretty damn smart(I'm not saying everyone else is dumb
), so I have a question for you that was never answered at steroidology. I plan on running a Tren E and Test E cycle in the near future, and I read a study saying that Tren will prevent liopgenesis as long as no estradiol was present:
StJohn LC, Ekeren PA, Crouse JD, Schanbacher BD, Smith SB, lipogenesis in adipose tissue from ovariectomized and intact heifers immunized against estradiol and/or implanted with trenbolone acetate, J Anim Sci 1987 May, 64 (5) : 1428-33
I know we're not cows, but would it be wise to run Aromasin with my Test cycle so I can get the full benefit of the Tren fat-burning effect, and would the Aromasin's increase in IGF be enough to offset the lack of benefits I would get from increased estrogen? Or should I just stick to Test and Tren(I will have to use Nolva throughout cycle because I am gyno prone like nobody's business). Your opinion or anyone else's is more than welcome, as I've been thinking about this for a while. Thanks!
StJohn LC, Ekeren PA, Crouse JD, Schanbacher BD, Smith SB, lipogenesis in adipose tissue from ovariectomized and intact heifers immunized against estradiol and/or implanted with trenbolone acetate, J Anim Sci 1987 May, 64 (5) : 1428-33
I know we're not cows, but would it be wise to run Aromasin with my Test cycle so I can get the full benefit of the Tren fat-burning effect, and would the Aromasin's increase in IGF be enough to offset the lack of benefits I would get from increased estrogen? Or should I just stick to Test and Tren(I will have to use Nolva throughout cycle because I am gyno prone like nobody's business). Your opinion or anyone else's is more than welcome, as I've been thinking about this for a while. Thanks!
