EQ dose

I believe 2 grams Deca or 3 grams EQ will give similar size and strength gains to 1 G Test, albeit with minimal side effects and better quality gains for the former.

Those anabolic/androgenic ratio studies
don't seem to apply in real life results.
 
I believe 2 grams Deca or 3 grams EQ will give similar size and strength gains to 1 G Test, albeit with minimal side effects and better quality gains for the former.

Those anabolic/androgenic ratio studies
don't seem to apply in real life results.
You believe? So you're speaking from experience? If you're running those doses and not a pro, you're nothing but a retard!
 
Nobody becomes pro or looks like they do with just 1 gram Test per week

Similarly, you won't look like they do with 3 grams EQ or 2 g Deca
which IMHO have effects roughly similar to 1 g Test.

And yes, I'm speaking from experience.
 
Are you going to answer everyone's questions to you or just avoid them and give ridiculous advice/opinions claiming they're from experience?
 
Deca>Test>EQ, its not even close. This is common knowledge among people with common sense.

MESO-Rx: What is the “Deca dilemma”?

Dan: If Bill Roberts and others are to be believed, Deca Durabolin actually has a higher attraction to steroid receptors. I mean if you have equal amount of Deca Durabolin and testosterone, it would be easier for Deca Durabolin to latch onto the receptor. Now what actually happens we found from anecdotal and rat studies that even though there is more available to the receptors it is half as anabolic. So, that is the dilemma: Why is it only half as anabolic when there is probably more of it at the receptors? It must be that it is doing something to the receptors that testosterone is but Deca isn’t or testosterone might be doing something outside the receptor. I don’t know. I think there is some kind of anabolic reaction outside the receptor. What it is we don’t know. I mean there is a whole bunch of new things. It might be that it influences the myostatin protein that was recently introduced, or maybe testosterone does a better job of up-regulating the receptor or something like that; it might be something completely inside where you might have more of a response of fibroblast growth factor in response to muscle cell membrane-wounding from training. It could be any of those. But because steroid subjects are not really marketable as of late, in my magazine writing I have not really pursued that avenue too much but I will get around to reading the research if there is an answer to be found. The odd thing is that as much as we look to the research, a scientist has never really made one big bodybuilder; I mean there is no doctor or scientist that has said this is how to grow a human being big, bigger than all these bodybuilders who don’t know what they’re doing. They’ve never done that, so I’m not sure we can look to answer this?

https://thinksteroids.com/articles/dan-duchaine-steroid-guru-interview/
 
Now what actually happens we found from anecdotal and rat studies that even though there is more available to the receptors it is half as anabolic.

Post a link to these studies. All you've posted is an interview with some meathead bodybuilder that thinks he knows it all
 
Back
Top