Estradiol Vs Estradiol, Ultrasensitive, LC/MS/MS

G2Ready

Well-known Member
Estradiol
Vs
Estradiol, Ultrasensitive, LC/MS/MS

Without being on tren or deca, anyone notice a difference in test/advantage?
Preferably taken both standard and sensitive at same time?


index.php


Why All Men Should be Tested with the Sensitive Estradiol Test


Ultra-high sensitivity analysis of estrogens for special populations in serum and plasma by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: assay considerations and suggested practices



index.php
 
LC/MS/MS is superior method.

CLIA ('normal' method) gets many interferences - such as famous tren interference, also other hormones/metabolites which might be raised with AAS use, leading to falsely high results. On the other end of spectrum CLIA doesn't have enough sensitivity to be used on males and kids most of the times (meaning without exogenous supplementation of hormones).
 
LC/MS/MS is superior method.

CLIA ('normal' method) gets many interferences - such as famous tren interference, also other hormones/metabolites which might be raised with AAS use, leading to falsely high results. On the other end of spectrum CLIA doesn't have enough sensitivity to be used on males and kids most of the times (meaning without exogenous supplementation of hormones).

Yeah when I was naive and treating numbers and not symptoms I was using standard test

Without knowing any better I would end up feeling like crap

Just speculation for me personally now, but I feel I was basing dosage of AI with insufficient numbers from standard testing

Just a thought

With standard I would feel better between 60-80
And hurt at 20-40
 
Back
Top