Fake report

“Tested 5 different times” is that standard practice? Also seems they got the signature right, no? Sure it’s pasted
 
Where was this report found? I think someone is jerking Jano around...
 
[emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787] The font and size of the results isn’t even close [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

9.94 mg of 10 mg is pretty good stuff too! I guess that’s a combo of concentration and purity at the same time.
 
Last edited:
9.94 per 10 makes no sense.
Qualitative and quantitative also makes no sense as these are quantitative results.
This is a really, really bad fake.
Jano, ever consider showing the results differently somehow?
Obviously, this template is easily redone. What goes inside seems to be very difficult though!!! LMAO
 
9.94 per 10 makes no sense.
Qualitative and quantitative also makes no sense as these are quantitative results.
This is a really, really bad fake.
Jano, ever consider showing the results differently somehow?
Obviously, this template is easily redone. What goes inside seems to be very difficult though!!! LMAO
Well, there is verification to avoid fakes.

But yeah, thought of changing the report a bit. More to the simpler side, with stronger security features.
 
Well, there is verification to avoid fakes.

Which they cropped out from the bottom, knowing someone would raise an eyebrow at that hack job they did.

i wonder how time consuming it would be for you to watermark the middle of the document with the compound name and concentration of the sample?

That way it couldn't be cropped out and messing with the body of the report would be pointless since it wouldn't match the watermark and would likely obscure it, making things look worse than the one above.

Just spit ballin' ideas...
 
Well, there is verification to avoid fakes.

But yeah, thought of changing the report a bit. More to the simpler side, with stronger security features.
Grey shading in the text boxes would make it harder to cut and paste or type over. It’s hard to match the shading exactly.
 
Which they cropped out from the bottom, knowing someone would raise an eyebrow at that hack job they did.

i wonder how time consuming it would be for you to watermark the middle of the document with the compound name and concentration of the sample?

That way it couldn't be cropped out and messing with the body of the report would be pointless since it wouldn't match the watermark and would likely obscure it, making things look worse than the one above.

Just spit ballin' ideas...
Actually, I want to watermark the entire report with verification link.
 
Back
Top