Though I've read everything I can, I'll be a newbie for a while, ducking flames from such an ignorant place that I can't even tell which questions are stupid... (smile)
No faq or article anywhere has actually mentioned tests made on hair loss and testicle shrinkage, by test dose.
What I mean is hair loss and testicle shrinkage analog, or binary... as in, the more test you take, the more hair loss and shrinkage, or 'if you take enough test to gain, you are at the same risk if you take massive doses'.
I'm sure there are opinions, but does anyone have experience and enough data to make a general statement?
If I'm on 500mg per week of test (lets assume test is test, as I've heard here), without hair loss, and not too much shrinkage, will 750 be worth the extra, or will I just place myself in a higher risk bracket? Where is the 'normalized breaking point', the place where one should not go without severely increasing risk.
I would assume it would be a higher risk from 500 to 750, but a buddy of mine who does this believes "it ain't so", and he's 59, with some experience in this (23 inch arms at one time). HOWEVER, I know one point on a graph does NOT make a fact. You need several data points, and one isn't enough to make me comfy.
A guy in the gym here does 3000 ED (benches 810lbs), and has thick full hair... so I know at LEAST that this is mostly genetic. BUT, as with everything, the more knowledge you can get, the less risk you incur (and no, I'm not about to ask a guy that benches 800 how big his nuts are).
I have no access to hcg, clomid, etc. (YET), so this info would be helpful until I can get my hands on some (not an easy task where I am from, though a kind soul here has mentioned a possible source I'm looking into).
As long as we are at it, is what my buddy told me true, that gyno won't happen with 500 a week, but you will get sensitive nips... OR, do sensitive nips always mean, GET SOME FREAKING NOVLA.
Thanks
No faq or article anywhere has actually mentioned tests made on hair loss and testicle shrinkage, by test dose.
What I mean is hair loss and testicle shrinkage analog, or binary... as in, the more test you take, the more hair loss and shrinkage, or 'if you take enough test to gain, you are at the same risk if you take massive doses'.
I'm sure there are opinions, but does anyone have experience and enough data to make a general statement?
If I'm on 500mg per week of test (lets assume test is test, as I've heard here), without hair loss, and not too much shrinkage, will 750 be worth the extra, or will I just place myself in a higher risk bracket? Where is the 'normalized breaking point', the place where one should not go without severely increasing risk.
I would assume it would be a higher risk from 500 to 750, but a buddy of mine who does this believes "it ain't so", and he's 59, with some experience in this (23 inch arms at one time). HOWEVER, I know one point on a graph does NOT make a fact. You need several data points, and one isn't enough to make me comfy.
A guy in the gym here does 3000 ED (benches 810lbs), and has thick full hair... so I know at LEAST that this is mostly genetic. BUT, as with everything, the more knowledge you can get, the less risk you incur (and no, I'm not about to ask a guy that benches 800 how big his nuts are).
I have no access to hcg, clomid, etc. (YET), so this info would be helpful until I can get my hands on some (not an easy task where I am from, though a kind soul here has mentioned a possible source I'm looking into).
As long as we are at it, is what my buddy told me true, that gyno won't happen with 500 a week, but you will get sensitive nips... OR, do sensitive nips always mean, GET SOME FREAKING NOVLA.
Thanks
proof first and put the bud down before you start typing, lol...no flame. 
